Central District Consumer Bankruptcy Attorney's Association

Under the local rules, the creditor is required to meet and confer prior to
filing a 2004 motion. If they did not do that then you can object on those
grounds. Check the local rules.
Sincerely,
Daniela P. Romero, Esq.
Law Office of Daniela P. Romero, APLC
1015 North Lake Ave., Ste. 214
Pasadena, CA 91104
Tel: (626) 817-2611
Fax: (626) 628-1781
email: dromerolaw@gmail.com
web: www.pasadenabankruptcylaw.com
____________________________________________________
NOTICE: This email (including attachments) is covered by the Electronic
Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521. The information herein is
confidential, privileged & exempt from disclosure under applicable law.
This E-mail (including attachments) are intended solely for the use of the
addressee hereof. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, you
are prohibited from reading, disclosing, reproducing, distributing,
disseminating, or otherwise using this transmission. The originator of this
email and its affiliates do not represent, warrant or guarantee that the
integrity of this communication has been maintained or that this
communication is free of errors, viruses or other defects. Delivery of this
message or any portions herein to any person other than the intended
recipient is not intended to waive any right or privilege. If you have
received this message in error, please promptly notify the sender by email
and immediately delete this message.
Contact Me [image:

The post was migrated from Yahoo.

Check the local rules (and code); it outlines the creditors rights under the examination.
Jonathan
[cid:image003.jpg@01CB818F.03D8AFF0]
Jonathan D. Leventhal, Esq.
This email and any attachments thereto may contain private, confidential, and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, copying, or distribution of this email (or any attachments thereto) by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender immediately and permanently delete the original and any copies of this email and any attachments thereto.

The post was migrated from Yahoo.

Sure it's allowed. It has nothing to do with the 341(a) meeting.
The only basis for objecting is if they are seeking information not
related to the bankruptcy or debtor's finances. It's a VERY broad
standard and I've never seen grounds for a successful objection.
*************************
Mark J. Markus
Law Office of Mark J. Markus
11684 Ventura Blvd. PMB #403
Studio City, CA 91604-2652
(818)509-1173 (818)509-1460 (fax)
web: http://www.bklaw.com/
This Firm is a Qualified Federal Debt Relief Agency (see what this
means at

The post was migrated from Yahoo.

Dear Listmates,
I have a ch11 client who had successfully completed 341a meeting with US Trustee and a group of creditors few months ago. A creditor who had participated in the 341a meeting filed a motion for 2004 examination 5 months after attending the meeting. Is it allowed?....what are possible grounds for an objection. Thank you.
Dear Listmates, I have a ch11 client who had successfully completed 341a meeting with US Trustee and a group of creditors few months ago. A creditor who had participated in the 341a meeting filed a motion for 2004 examination 5 months after attending the meeting. Is it allowed?....what are possible grounds for an objection. Thank you. Teri Lim

The post was migrated from Yahoo.