Central District Consumer Bankruptcy Attorney's Association

Mark,
no problem from TE or secured creditors whatsoever. Probably a no-
brainer 0% plan, (unless liquidation analysis issues)
Ty Takeuchi
>
> Debtor needs to cure arrerages on a mortgage and wants to do a 60-
month Ch. 13 plan, but is way below median on the means test. In
fact, the funds to make the plan work will be coming from relatives.
>
> The way I read the Code, it seems like the 60 months would only be
allowed for cause if approved by the Court. What are the chances
(would be a Valley case)?
>
> Thanks,
>
> ______________________
> Mark J. Markus
> Law Office of Mark J. Markus
> 11684 Ventura Blvd. PMB #403
> Studio City, CA 91604-2652
> (818)509-1173 (818)509-1460 (fax)
> web: http://www.bklaw.com/
> This Firm is a Qualified Federal Debt Relief Agency
> ___________
> NOTICE: This Electronic Message contains information from the law
office of Mark J. Markus that may be privileged. The information is
intended for the use of the addressee only. If you are not the
addressee, note that any disclosure, copy, distribution or use of the
contents of this message is prohibited.
> IRS CIRCULAR 230 NOTICE: To ensure compliance with requirements
imposed by the IRS, we inform you that any U.S. tax advice contained
in this communication (or in any attachment) is not intended or
written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i)
avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii)
promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any
transaction or matter addressed in this communication (or in any
attachment).
>

The post was migrated from Yahoo.

>
> Debtor needs to cure arrerages on a mortgage and wants to do a 60-
month Ch. 13 plan, but is way below median on the means test. In
fact, the funds to make the plan work will be coming from relatives.
>
> The way I read the Code, it seems like the 60 months would only be
allowed for cause if approved by the Court. What are the chances
(would be a Valley case)?
>
> Thanks,
>
> ______________________
> Mark J. Markus
> Law Office of Mark J. Markus
> 11684 Ventura Blvd. PMB #403
> Studio City, CA 91604-2652
> (818)509-1173 (818)509-1460 (fax)
> web: http://www.bklaw.com/
> This Firm is a Qualified Federal Debt Relief Agency
> ___________
> NOTICE: This Electronic Message contains information from the law
office of Mark J. Markus that may be privileged. The information is
intended for the use of the addressee only. If you are not the
addressee, note that any disclosure, copy, distribution or use of the
contents of this message is prohibited.
> IRS CIRCULAR 230 NOTICE: To ensure compliance with requirements
imposed by the IRS, we inform you that any U.S. tax advice contained
in this communication (or in any attachment) is not intended or
written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i)
avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii)
promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any
transaction or matter addressed in this communication (or in any
attachment).
>

The post was migrated from Yahoo.

charset="US-ASCII"
About100%
I file most of my cases as 60 months (all of the 100% cases) and have
never had an objection
Erik Clark
Borowitz, Lozano & Clark, LLP
100 N. Barranca Avenue, Suite 250
West Covina, CA 91791
Office: (626) 332-8600
Fax: (626) 332-8644
eclark@BLClaw.com
www.BLClaw.com
Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If
you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for
delivery of the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver
this message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message
and kindly notify the sender by reply email. Please advise immediately
if you or your employer does not consent to Internet email for messages
of this kind. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this
message that do not relate to the official business of my firm shall be
understood as neither given nor endorsed by it.
IRS Circular 230 Disclosure: To ensure compliance with Treasury
Department Regulations, we advise you that, unless otherwise expressly
indicated, any federal tax advice contained in this communication was
not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose
of (i) avoiding tax-related penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or
applicable state or local tax law provisions or (ii) promoting,
marketing or recommending to another party any tax-related matter
addressed herein.
________________________________

The post was migrated from Yahoo.

100% as long a the Plan is feasible. I've never heard of a judge refusing a longer than 36 month plan for curing arrears.
Mark JM wrote: Debtor needs to cure arrerages on a mortgage and wants to do a 60-month Ch. 13 plan, but is way below median on the means test. In fact, the funds to make the plan work will be coming from relatives.

The way I read the Code, it seems like the 60 months would only be allowed for cause if approved by the Court. What are the chances (would be a Valley case)?

Thanks,

______________________
Mark J. Markus
Law Office of Mark J. Markus
11684 Ventura Blvd. PMB #403
Studio City, CA 91604-2652
(818)509-1173 (818)509-1460 (fax)
web: http://www.bklaw.com/
This Firm is a Qualified Federal Debt Relief Agency
___________
NOTICE: This Electronic Message contains information from the law office of Mark J. Markus that may be privileged. The information is intended for the use of the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, note that any disclosure, copy, distribution or use of the contents of this message is prohibited.
IRS CIRCULAR 230 NOTICE: To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS, we inform you that any U.S. tax advice contained in this communication (or in any attachment) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed in this communication (or in any attachment).
Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.
100% as long a the Plan is feasible. I've never heard of a judge refusing a longer than 36 month plan for curing arrears.Mark JM <bklawr@yahoo.com> wrote: Debtor needs to cure arrerages on a mortgage and wants to do a 60-month Ch. 13 plan, but is way below median on the means test. In fact, the funds to make the plan work will be coming from relatives. The way I read the Code, it seems like the 60 months
would only be allowed for cause if approved by the Court. What are the chances (would be a Valley case)? Thanks, ______________________Mark J. MarkusLaw Office of Mark J. Markus11684 Ventura Blvd. PMB #403Studio City, CA 91604-2652(818)509-1173 (818)509-1460 (fax)web: http://www.bklaw.com/This Firm is a Qualified Federal Debt Relief Agency___________NOTICE: This Electronic Message contains information from the law office of Mark J. Markus that may be privileged. The information is intended for the use of the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, note that any disclosure, copy, distribution or use of the contents of this message is prohibited.IRS CIRCULAR 230
NOTICE: To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS, we inform you that any U.S. tax advice contained in this communication (or in any attachment) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed in this communication (or in any attachment).
Looking for last minute shopping deals?
Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.

The post was migrated from Yahoo.

Debtor needs to cure arrerages on a mortgage and wants to do a 60-month Ch. 13 plan, but is way below median on the means test. In fact, the funds to make the plan work will be coming from relatives.
The way I read the Code, it seems like the 60 months would only be allowed for cause if approved by the Court. What are the chances (would be a Valley case)?
Thanks,
______________________
Mark J. Markus
Law Office of Mark J. Markus
11684 Ventura Blvd. PMB #403
Studio City, CA 91604-2652
(818)509-1173 (818)509-1460 (fax)
web: http://www.bklaw.com/
This Firm is a Qualified Federal Debt Relief Agency
___________
NOTICE: This Electronic Message contains information from the law office of Mark J. Markus that may be privileged. The information is intended for the use of the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, note that any disclosure, copy, distribution or use of the contents of this message is prohibited.
IRS CIRCULAR 230 NOTICE: To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS, we inform you that any U.S. tax advice contained in this communication (or in any attachment) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed in this communication (or in any attachment).
Debtor needs to cure arrerages on a mortgage and
wants to do a 60-month Ch. 13 plan, but is way below median on the means
test. In fact, the funds to make the plan work will be coming from
relatives.

The way I read the Code, it seems like the 60
months would only be allowed for cause if approved by the Court. What are
the chances (would be a Valley case)?

Thanks,

______________________Mark J. MarkusLaw
Office of Mark J. Markus11684 Ventura Blvd. PMB #403Studio City, CA91604-2652(818)509-1173 (818)509-1460 (fax)web: http://www.bklaw.com/This Firm is aQualified Federal Debt Relief Agency___________NOTICE: This Electronic
Message contains information from the law office of Mark J. Markus that may be
privileged. The information is intended for the use of the addresseeonly. If you are not the addressee, note that any disclosure, copy,
distribution or use of the contents of this message is prohibited.IRS
CIRCULAR 230 NOTICE: To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS,
we inform you that any U.S. tax advice contained in this communication (or in
any attachment) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for
the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii)
promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or
matter addressed in this communication (or in any
attachment).

The post was migrated from Yahoo.