Page 1 of 1

request for 727 & 707 points and authorities

Posted: Sat Feb 09, 2008 8:43 pm
by Yahoo Bot

Creighton,
Just a side issue: Ask your clients if they received their TILA
disclosures in Spanish. If not, you have a different set of
substantive issues, because California law requires that TILA
disclosures be made in the predominant language spoken at home, if
that language is among others, Spanish.
Did you do any discovery against the OUST? Do you have time to do
discovery against the OUST? When is the trial?
Lou Esbin
>
> I inquired about sample pleadings on Monday - Can anyone provide
any help
> on this request?
>
> I am looking for a sample trial brief opposing a U.S. Trustee 727
> complaint?
>
> My clients defense I believe is lack of the requisite intent I
believe the
> statutes require.
> I have some below median income , literacy challenged clients who
> filed through "we the people" somehow managing to accurately schedule
> mortgage dent on upside down property without scheduling the property
> itself. Apparently the language barrier (Spanish) contributed to
> unsatisfactory 341(a) responses. (I am curious as to how the UST
> expects prove the intent seemingly required by the statutes; I hope I
> am not being an unrealistic idealist) I have ordered but not
> received the digital recording from the 341(a)
>
>
> I could also use a sample 707 b opposition. Creditor Motion to
Dismiss
>
> Debtior is 72 and receiving social security and working as a domestic
> (butler)
>
> Creditors contention is that 60 months of the debtors social
security would
> pay 100 of unsecured claims. As I read the statutes social security is
> excluded from the means test. ? any thoughts?
>

The post was migrated from Yahoo.

request for 727 & 707 points and authorities

Posted: Fri Feb 08, 2008 7:34 am
by Yahoo Bot

I inquired about sample pleadings on Monday - Can anyone provide any help
on this request?
I am looking for a sample trial brief opposing a U.S. Trustee 727
complaint?
My clients defense I believe is lack of the requisite intent I believe the
statutes require.
I have some below median income , literacy challenged clients who
filed through "we the people" somehow managing to accurately schedule
mortgage dent on upside down property without scheduling the property
itself. Apparently the language barrier (Spanish) contributed to
unsatisfactory 341(a) responses. (I am curious as to how the UST
expects prove the intent seemingly required by the statutes; I hope I
am not being an unrealistic idealist) I have ordered but not
received the digital recording from the 341(a)
I could also use a sample 707 b opposition. Creditor Motion to Dismiss
Debtior is 72 and receiving social security and working as a domestic
(butler)
Creditors contention is that 60 months of the debtors social security would
pay 100 of unsecured claims. As I read the statutes social security is
excluded from the means test. ? any thoughts?

The post was migrated from Yahoo.

request for 727 & 707 points and authorities

Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2008 5:04 pm
by Yahoo Bot

Will any one provide me with a copy of a successful trial brief in
opposition to a U.S. Trustee 727 complaint?
I have some below median income , literacy challenged clients who
filed through "we the people" somehow managing to accurately schedule
mortgage dent on upside down property without scheduling the property
itself. Apparently the language barrier (Spanish) contributed to
unsatisfactory 341(a) responses. (I am curious as to how the UST
expects prove the intent seemingly required by the statutes; I hope I
am not being an unrealistic idealist) I have ordered but not
received the digital recording from the 341(a)
And when it rains it pours...
Would anyone willing to provide me with a copy of a successful 707(b)
opposition?
My facts involve the curious situation of a couple of industrious 73+
social security recipients who prefer a slightly better standard of
living than social security alone would allow and a very well healed
individual creditor with a passion for injustice who has brought such
a motion (in addition to a separate discharge ability complaint)
Contending 60 months of social security (from schedule I) would allow
payment of 100% to creditors.
Even an unsuccessful pleading would be real help, I tend to work so
much more efficiently editing and adapting an existing pleading than
working from scratch and in spite of 25 years in this business my
first encounter with this particular beast

The post was migrated from Yahoo.