Homestead: $150,000
Posted: Sat Feb 09, 2008 8:18 pm
I would agree with David. Although Dennis is correct in his strategy,
if challenged, the issue of when they paid you a visit may become an
issue. You will have an issue of past year's tax returns, etc. And,
on one income, wouldn't there be an issue of paying the mortgage each
month? The $150K exemption requires proof of an inability to be
gainfully employed, as one of the alternatives, as well as a
disability. And, so, I ask my clients for any evidence of either of
those options.
Lou
>
> My 2 cents is that you are out of luck. He's married so the first prong
> does not apply.
>
>
> David A. Tilem
> Certified Bankruptcy Specialist*
> Law Offices of David A. Tilem (a debt relief agency)
> 206 N. Jackson Street, #201, Glendale, CA 91206
> Tel: 818-507-6000 Fax: 818-507-6800
>
> * Bankruptcy specialist cert. by State Bar of CA Bd of Legal
> Specialization.
> Business bankruptcy specialist cert. by Amer. Bd. of Certification
>
>
Behalf Of
> Hale Andrew Antico, Esq.
> Sent: Friday, February 08, 2008 12:04 PM
> To: cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [cdcbaa] Homestead: $150,000
>
>
>
> Law: CCP 704.730(a)(3)(C) provides that we can exempt $150,000 of
equity in
> real property where the debtor lives. However, I'm not clear whether my
> debtor qualifies. The way I read it, it's:
>
> --> 55 or older AND gross annual income of less than $15,000
> OR
> --> if married, gross annual income (including spouse) of less than
$20,000
> AND it's an involuntary sale
>
> Facts: My client is married but filing solo. Debtor is over 55,
married,
> and has earned less than $15,000 the past year. Considering non-filing
> spouse, income is over $20,000.
>
> Issue: Can debtor choose the $15,000 clause above since wife is not
part of
> this? Or MUST he count her and go over with her $20,000 as a teacher's
> assistant?
>
> And yes, the $150,000 exemption helps him, but only $75,000 would
cause, um,
> problems.
> Hale
>
The post was migrated from Yahoo.