Central District Consumer Bankruptcy Attorney's Association

Any update on this issue? I claimed the voluntary 401K loan repayment on line 26 and the OUST in LA is objecting. On another case, the OUST in WH suggested I claim it on line 26. When I told him that the OUST in LA was objecting, his reponse was they do things differently!

Any suggestions?

Thanks.

Susana B. Tolchard, Esq.
LAW OFFICES OF SUSANA B. TOLCHARD & ASSOCIATES
23734 Valencia Blvd., Suite 304
Valencia, CA 91355
Telephone: (661) 287-9986
Facsimile: (661) 287-9662

Member National Association of Consumer Bankruptcy Attorneys (NACBA)

We are a federally designated Debt Relief Agency under the United States
Bankruptcy Laws. We assist people with finding solutions to their debt
problems, including, where appropriate, assisting them with the filing
of petitions for relief under the United States Bankruptcy Code.
This does not constitute an electronic signature.
This message contains confidential information which may also be
privileged. Unless you are the intended recipient (or authorized to receive
for the intended recipient) you may not copy, use or distribute the
information contained in this message.
P L wrote:
I don't see any flaw in your analysis except that qualified retirement deductions reduce CMI as not property of the estate rather than as "allowed expenses" and since Form B22A doesn't have a enumerated reduction of CMI for 541(b)(7) (as does Form B22C) you can try to add the voluntary 401k contribution under the additional expense claims section with statement "reduction of CMI pursuant to 541(b)(7)". You can try to add the 401k loan under line 26 of B22A as a mandatory deduction; I believe this is one of the questions on David Tilem's list for Peter Anderson (If you can't, then perhaps you can argue that there needs to be some provision in B22 for priority tax debt resulting form changing a 401k loan to a taxable withdrawal...)

The issue of potential ineligibility for Chapter 7 discharge due to presumption of abuse under B22A versus hypothetical eligibility for immediate discharge where B22C disposable income is zero is still up in the air, but the 9th Circuit should be proving us with helpful decisions in Kagenveama and Garcia very soon.

In my oral argument, I had the opportunity to try to explain to the court that B22A unfairly denies the poorer Chapter 7 debtors the 541(b)(7) CMI reduction in contrast to allowing higher income (over median) Chapter 13 debtors the reduction under B22C; this was done in the context of arguing that the B22A presumption of abuse for Chapter 7 discharge purposes (rebutale by adjusting CMI downward under 707(b)(2)(B)(i) special circumstances) should not be carried over to Chapter 13 to create a rebutable presumption under the 1325(b)(1)(B) disposable income calculation that allows the Trustee to alter the CMI - 1325(b)(2) disposable income calculation (B22C) by seasoning it with actual I & J figures and/or crystal ball gazing projections of furutre changed budget circumstances.

Best luck with your case.
Peter
salanick wrote:
Hoping to not run afoul of 707(b)(2)(B), I have already looked at
541(b)(7) and some case law, but I want to be sure not to miss
something in my analysis. Specifically, whether a client's
contribution to retirement plan(s) and/or retirement loan re-payment
will be considered an "allowed expense", for purposes of both B22A
and Sch I/CMI calculation.
Client would like to file Ch 7 case in LA. She is a teacher with
retirement contributions (voluntary) withheld from each paycheck
(~$400/month). This contribution is to a qualified 403(b) plan and is
IN ADDITION to her STRS contribution (mandatory). She has also taken
a loan against retirement account monies and may want to begin
repayment depending on if can get discharge of this (see 523(a)(18)
and how wold affect CMI.
I believe that whether we "pass" the Means Test depends on if we get
allowed expenses of : (1) voluntary retirement contribution(s); and/or
(2) repayment of retirement account loan.
Incidentally, if forced into a 13, she will at least get the loan
repayment allowance on B22C and will qualify for immediate discharge
(see In re Bullock). This seems an absurd result.
Am I missing something? Your thoughts are greatly appreciated.
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.
Any update on this issue? I claimed the voluntary 401K loan repayment on line 26 and the OUST in LA is objecting. On another case, the OUST in WH suggested I claim it on line 26. When I told him that the OUST in LA was objecting, his reponse was they do things differently! Any suggestions? Thanks. Susana B. Tolchard, Esq.LAW OFFICES OF SUSANA B. TOLCHARD & ASSOCIATES23734 Valencia Blvd., Suite 304Valencia, CA 91355Telephone: (661) 287-9986Facsimile: (661) 287-9662 Member National Association of Consumer Bankruptcy Attorneys (NACBA) We are a federally designated Debt Relief Agency under the United StatesBankruptcy Laws. We assist people with finding solutions to their debtproblems, including, where appropriate, assisting them with the filingof petitions for relief under the United
States Bankruptcy Code. This does not constitute an electronic signature. This message contains confidential information which may also beprivileged. Unless you are the intended recipient (or authorized to receivefor the intended recipient) you may not copy, use or distribute theinformation contained in this message.P L <petermlively2000@yahoo.com> wrote: I don't see any flaw in your analysis except that qualified retirement deductions reduce CMI as not property of the estate rather than
as "allowed expenses" and since Form B22A doesn't have a enumerated reduction of CMI for 541(b)(7) (as does Form B22C) you can try to add the voluntary 401k contribution under the additional expense claims section with statement "reduction of CMI pursuant to 541(b)(7)". You can try to add the 401k loan under line 26 of B22A as a mandatory deduction; I believe this is one of the questions on David Tilem's list for Peter Anderson (If you can't, then perhaps you can argue that there needs to be some provision in B22 for priority tax debt resulting form changing a 401k loan to a taxable withdrawal...) The issue of potential ineligibility for Chapter 7 discharge due to presumption of abuse under B22A versus hypothetical eligibility for immediate discharge where B22C disposable income is zero is still up in the air, but the 9th Circuit should be proving us with helpful
decisions in Kagenveama and Garcia very soon. In my oral argument, I had the opportunity to try to explain to the court that B22A unfairly denies the poorer Chapter 7 debtors the 541(b)(7) CMI reduction in contrast to allowing higher income (over median) Chapter 13 debtors the reduction under B22C; this was done in the context of arguing that the B22A presumption of abuse for Chapter 7 discharge purposes (rebutale by adjusting CMI downward under 707(b)(2)(B)(i) special circumstances) should not be carried over to Chapter 13 to create a rebutable presumption under the 1325(b)(1)(B) disposable income calculation that allows the Trustee to alter the CMI - 1325(b)(2) disposable income calculation (B22C) by seasoning it with actual I & J figures and/or crystal ball gazing projections of furutre changed budget circumstances.
Best luck with your case. Peter salanick <salanick@gmail.com> wrote: Hoping to not run afoul of 707(b)(2)(B), I have already looked at541(b)(7) and some case law, but I want to be sure not to misssomething in my analysis. Specifically, whether a client'scontribution to retirement plan(s) and/or retirement loan re-paymentwill be considered an "allowed expense", for purposes of both B22A and Sch I/CMI calculation. Client would like to file Ch 7 case in LA. She is a teacher withretirement contributions (voluntary) withheld from each paycheck(~$400/month). This contribution is to a qualified 403(b) plan and isIN ADDITION to her STRS contribution (mandatory). She has also takena loan against retirement account monies and may want to beginrepayment depending on if can get
discharge of this (see 523(a)(18)and how wold affect CMI.I believe that whether we "pass" the Means Test depends on if we getallowed expenses of : (1) voluntary retirement contribution(s); and/or(2) repayment of retirement account loan. Incidentally, if forced into a 13, she will at least get the loanrepayment allowance on B22C and will qualify for immediate discharge(see In re Bullock). This seems an absurd result.Am I missing something? Your thoughts are greatly appreciated. __________________________________________________Do You Yahoo!?Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
Looking for last minute shopping deals?
Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.

The post was migrated from Yahoo.