Central District Consumer Bankruptcy Attorney's Association

The code says "10 days after the date of the first meeting of creditors".
Patrick T. Green, Esq.
Fitzgerald & Green
Attorneys at Law
1010 E. Union Street
Suite 206
Pasadena, CA 91106
Tel: 626-449-8433
Fax: 626-449-0565
pat@fitzgreenlaw.com
hmosesi@yahoo.com
Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2008 10:18 AM
To: cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [cdcbaa] USTEE'S Inability to Determine Presumed Abuse
This issue hasn't come up for me, but does the duty to file the report
kick-in 10 days after the first meeting of creditors or 10 days after the
conclusion of the meeting of creditors?
Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2008 10:02:20
To:
Subject: RE: [cdcbaa] USTEE'S Inability to Determine Presumed Abuse
Sorry 704(b)(1). It is a condition precedent to the duties under (b)(2).Patrick T. Green, Esq.
Fitzgerald & Green
Attorneys at Law
1010 E. Union Street
Suite 206
Pasadena, CA 91106
Tel: 626-449-8433
Fax: 626-449-0565
pat@fitzgreenlaw.com
kennethjschwartz
Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2008 7:36 AM
To: cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [cdcbaa] USTEE'S Inability to Determine Presumed Abuse
After supplying my Chapter 7 Debtor's medical records to the U.S. Trustee
and answering its
concerns, it filed a "Notice of Inability to Determine Presumed Abuse". Has
anyone seen one
of these before? What is the effect of it, if any?
Thanks.
Yahoo! Groups Links

The post was migrated from Yahoo.

Sorry 704(b)(1). It is a condition precedent to the duties under (b)(2).
Patrick T. Green, Esq.
Fitzgerald & Green
Attorneys at Law
1010 E. Union Street
Suite 206
Pasadena, CA 91106
Tel: 626-449-8433
Fax: 626-449-0565
pat@fitzgreenlaw.com

The post was migrated from Yahoo.

See 704(b)(2)
Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2008 9:36 AM
To: cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com
After supplying my Chapter 7 Debtor's medical records to the U.S. Trustee
and answering its
concerns, it filed a "Notice of Inability to Determine Presumed Abuse".
Has anyone seen one
of these before? What is the effect of it, if any?
Thanks.

The post was migrated from Yahoo.

What Dennis said. And it fulfills their statutory duty to file *something*
so they have a marker if they want to create a fuss later. Hale
Dennis McGoldrick
Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2008 9:44 AM
To: cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [cdcbaa] Re: USTEE'S Inability to Determine Presumed Abuse
wrote:
>
> After supplying my Chapter 7 Debtor's medical records to the U.S.
Trustee and answering its
> concerns, it filed a "Notice of Inability to Determine Presumed
Abuse". Has anyone seen one
> of these before? What is the effect of it, if any?
>
>
> Thanks.
>
It is just Waffling, it means they can take a bite later (file a 707(b)
motion later without you saying they earlier agreed there was not a presumed
abuse).
dennis
Yahoo! Groups Links

The post was migrated from Yahoo.

wrote:
>
> After supplying my Chapter 7 Debtor's medical records to the U.S.
Trustee and answering its
> concerns, it filed a "Notice of Inability to Determine Presumed
Abuse". Has anyone seen one
> of these before? What is the effect of it, if any?
>
>
> Thanks.
>
It is just Waffling, it means they can take a bite later (file a 707(b)
motion later without you saying they earlier agreed there was not a
presumed abuse).
dennis

The post was migrated from Yahoo.

After supplying my Chapter 7 Debtor's medical records to the U.S. Trustee and answering its
concerns, it filed a "Notice of Inability to Determine Presumed Abuse". Has anyone seen one
of these before? What is the effect of it, if any?
Thanks.

The post was migrated from Yahoo.