(except for necessaries of life)
watch our for this parenthetical. Necessaries of life
include clothes for the kids, milk at the 7-11, etc.
The comment that no nonfiling spouse gets sued after
the filing spouse gets a discharge is just an
observation, a good one, keep readiing.
One day a bright bushy-tailed attorney will sue a
nonfiling spouse, prove the debts were for
necessities, and win. I have a wierd idea it will be
one of those downstream purchasers of credit-card
debt. They have the most to gain as a three-year-old
debt, purchased for pennies on the dollar will be
worth double due to the 30% default interest.
(remember the community property discharge will
prohibit collection unless a subsequent divorce
intervenes - the real reason not to sue)
I sat in small claims court (after being illegally
ordered to appear for a hearing and give a status on a
bankruptcy) and watched the small claims commissioner
in the Hill St. courthouse give judgment after
judgement against mr & mrs debtor to JC Penney, Sears,
et al, when the creditors brought in the charge slips
and showed the commissioner the charges were for
clothing and household goods, EVEN WHEN THE CREDIT
CARD WAS ONLY IN ONE SPOUSE'S NAME.
After that experience, I have always warned the
spouses (especially if divorced) they may be the first
to meet the bushy-tailed lawyer.
In fact, this thought stream impacts the discussion
last week about not paying a debt assigned in a
divorce as a community property split. The other
spouse may really be liable.
dennis
Yesterday I suggested we all wear Hawaiian shirts to
the NACBA conference. I hope you will join me in so
doing, it will be fun to show the rest of the country
how many we are. Of course, Eric is excused when he
is on the rostrum.
Though maybe a Hawaiian print
tie?
The post was migrated from Yahoo.