Central District Consumer Bankruptcy Attorney's Association

Lower it to the percentage that the payment they agreed to will cover the
lowered percentage and pay a fee app for you doing the MoMod
R. Grace Rodriguez, Esq.
Full service Real Estate Attorney &
California State Bar
Certified Bankruptcy Specialist
OFF: (818) 734-7223
CEL: (818) 554-9922
NO EX-PARTE NOTICE VIA VOICE MAIL OR EMAIL: I do not accept notice for *Ex
Parte* Applications via voicemail or by email. You must comply with
California Law and give notice to a person in my office during regular
business hours.
CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: This message contains privileged and
confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If
you are not the intended recipient you should not disseminate, distribute,
store, print, copy or deliver this message. Please notify the sender
immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and
delete this e-mail from your system.
IRS CIRCULAR 230 DISCLOSURE: To comply with requirements imposed by the
Department of the Treasury, we inform you that any U.S. tax advice
contained in this communication (including any attachments) is not
intended or written by the practitioner to be used, and that it cannot be
used by any taxpayer, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties
that may be imposed on the taxpayer, and (ii) supporting the
promotion or marketing of any transactions or matters addressed herein.
On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 2:12 PM, sam@southbaybk.com [cdcbaa] wrote:
>
>
> Practice pointer question: I have a case before Ms. Curry in which we
> confirmed a disposable income plan to pay 8% to class 5 creditors. Based
> upon claims filed, the plan is now about $4,000 short. The notice of
> intent to pay claims points out that the plan is underfunded, so I know I
> have to do a MoMod to pay the extra in. My question is: can I instead get
> a MoMod through to lower the percentage paid while keeping the payments
> level? Just curious if anyone else has tried this.
>
>
>
Lower it to the percentage that the payment they agreed to will cover the lowered percentage and pay a fee app for you doing the MoMod
The post was migrated from Yahoo.

Yes. I have done several.
On Mar 2, 2016 2:54 PM, "'Steven L. Bryson' SLBLAW1@aol.com [cdcbaa]" wrote:
>
>
> I don't see why not. Just be careful not to violate Sec 1325(a)(4) when
> you reduce the percentage.
>
>
> *Steven L. Bryson *Attorney at Law
> *Certified Bankruptcy Specialist*
> *State Bar of California*
> *Board of Legal Specialization*
> *11377 W. Olympic Bl., Ste 500*
> *Los Angeles, CA 90064*
>
> *310-477-4555 *www.file4bankruptcy.com
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> To: cdcbaa
> Sent: Wed, Mar 2, 2016 2:12 pm
> Subject: [cdcbaa] Modification of Plan for Percentage Discrepency
>
>
> Practice pointer question: I have a case before Ms. Curry in which we
> confirmed a disposable income plan to pay 8% to class 5 creditors. Based
> upon claims filed, the plan is now about $4,000 short. The notice of
> intent to pay claims points out that the plan is underfunded, so I know I
> have to do a MoMod to pay the extra in. My question is: can I instead get
> a MoMod through to lower the percentage paid while keeping the payments
> level? Just curious if anyone else has tried this.
>
>
Yes. I have done several.
On Mar 2, 2016 2:54 PM, "'Steven L. Bryson' SLBLAW1@aol.com [cdcbaa]" <cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
I don't see why not. Just be careful not to violate Sec 1325(a)(4) when you reduce the percentage.
Steven L. Bryson
Attorney at Law
Certified Bankruptcy Specialist
State Bar of California
Board of Legal Specialization
11377 W. Olympic Bl., Ste 500
Los Angeles, CA

The post was migrated from Yahoo.

I don't see why not. Just be careful not to violate Sec 1325(a)(4) when you reduce the percentage.
Steven L. Bryson
Attorney at Law
Certified Bankruptcy Specialist
State Bar of California
Board of Legal Specialization
11377 W. Olympic Bl., Ste 500
Los Angeles, CA 90064
310-477-4555
www.file4bankruptcy.com
To: cdcbaa
Sent: Wed, Mar 2, 2016 2:12 pm
Subject: [cdcbaa] Modification of Plan for Percentage Discrepency
Practice pointer question: I have a case before Ms. Curry in which we confirmed a disposable income plan to pay 8% to class 5 creditors. Based upon claims filed, the plan is now about $4,000 short. The notice of intent to pay claims points out that the plan is underfunded, so I know I have to do a MoMod to pay the extra in. My question is: can I instead get a MoMod through to lower the percentage paid while keeping the payments level? Just curious if anyone else has tried this.
I don't see why not. Just be careful not to violate Sec 1325(a)(4) when you reduce the percentage.
Steven L. Bryson
Attorney at Law
Certified Bankruptcy Specialist
State Bar of California
Board of Legal Specialization
11377 W. Olympic Bl., Ste 500
Los Angeles, CA 90064
310-477-4555
www.file4bankruptcy.com
-----Original Message-----
To: cdcbaa <cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wed, Mar 2, 2016 2:12 pm
Subject: [cdcbaa] Modification of Plan for Percentage Discrepency

Practice pointer question: I have a case before Ms. Curry in which we confirmed a disposable income plan to pay 8% to class 5 creditors. Based upon claims filed, the plan is now about $4,000 short. The notice of intent to pay claims points out that the plan is underfunded, so I know I have to do a MoMod to pay the extra in. My question is: can I instead get a MoMod through to lower the percentage paid while keeping the payments level? Just curious if anyone else has tried this.
#AOLMsgPart_2_621bb763-4e4c-4a81-93c9-da1c0434f9e6 td{color: black;} .aolReplacedBody #ygrp-mkp { border: 1px solid #d8d8d8; font-family: Arial; margin: 10px 0; padding: 0 10px; } .ao
The post was migrated from Yahoo.