I know the plan requires student loans to be treated
Posted: Mon Aug 02, 2010 11:08 am
Is there a reason why one creditor should get paid 100% during the term but
others of the same class should not? You'd probably need to show why it's
fair. What does your research on the case law show?
shawnswhite
Sent: Friday, July 30, 2010 1:50 PM
To: cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [cdcbaa] Re: I know the plan requires student loans to be treated
the same as other unsecured
This doesn't quite answer my question. If (hypothetically) a debtor had
funds that were not part of the bankruptcy estate could he voluntarily make
extra payments to an unsecured creditor.
>
> debt but if a debtor in a Ch 13 came into unexpected money - a one time
thing like an inheritance etc. - could they use that money to make a student
loan payment? or are voluntary payments made directly to unsecured
creditors not allowed?
>
> I have debtor's who are desperate to pay off their student loans - their
loans will actually be higher when the plan ends due to the interest and
they want to know if there is any set of circumstances where they could
apply extra money to the student loans.
>
> Thank you,
>
> Shawn
>
Yahoo! Groups Links
The post was migrated from Yahoo.