Central District Consumer Bankruptcy Attorney's Association

My reading of In re George 361 F.3d 1157 (9th Cir. 2004) is that a claim by
the UEF against an uninsured employer, previously deemed to be an exise tax (In
re Camilli, 94 F.3d 1330 (9th Cir. 1996) is not the case in California.
Camilli was distinguished as an Arizona issue, and therefore, the UEF claim is, in
fact, dischargeable in California. GO FOR IT!

The post was migrated from Yahoo.

I am very interested in reading that case. What is the cite? I
can't comprehend which part of Section 523(a) that claim would come
under. Thanks. Jon
> Client was not insured under worker's comp insurance.
> One of the workers made a claim to WCAB under Uninsured Fund.
> I've recently noticed Own George & Debra George vs. Uninsured
Employers Fund; Dept. of Industrial Relations recently filed with
the 9th Circuit making the claims under the uninsured fund non-
dischargeable.
> Any insights? Ch7 was in mind.
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Sun N. Han,
> Attorney at Law
>
> Confidentiality Note:
> The information contained in this electronic mail is legally
privileged and confidential, intended only for the use of the
individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is
not the intended recipient, you should immediately stop reading this
message. You are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly
prohibited. If you receive this communication in error, please
notify us immediately by telephone (toll-free) at (800) 380-0079 and
return the original message to us at the above listed address via
electronic mail then delete it from your system. We will reimburse
you for telephone expenses involved. Thank you. atty3@k...
>
> Tel: 213-251-1777 * Fax: 213-251-1778
> -------------------------------------------------------------------

The post was migrated from Yahoo.

Client was not insured under worker's comp insurance.
One of the workers made a claim to WCAB under Uninsured Fund.
I've recently noticed Own George & Debra George vs. Uninsured Employers Fund; Dept. of Industrial Relations recently filed with the 9th Circuit making the claims under the uninsured fund non-dischargeable.
Any insights? Ch7 was in mind.
Sun N. Han,
Attorney at Law
Confidentiality Note:
The information contained in this electronic mail is legally privileged and confidential, intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you should immediately stop reading this message. You are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you receive this communication in error, please notify us immediately by telephone (toll-free) at (800) 380-0079 and return the original message to us at the above listed address via electronic mail then delete it from your system. We will reimburse you for telephone expenses involved. Thank you. atty3@koamlaw.com
Tel: 213-251-1777 * Fax: 213-251-1778
Client was not insured under worker's compinsurance.
One of the workers made a claim to WCAB under
Uninsured Fund.
I've recently noticed Own George & Debra George
vs. Uninsured Employers Fund; Dept. of Industrial Relations recently filed with
the 9th Circuit making the claims under the uninsured fund
non-dischargeable.
Any insights? Ch7 was in mind.



The post was migrated from Yahoo.