.jpg)
Voluntary retirement payments in Ch 13
Thanks Ty. Carolyn
----- Original Message -----
To: cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, July 16, 2005 10:02 AM
Subject: RE: [cdcbaa] Voluntary retirement payments in Ch 13
Caroline,
In ten years and a few hundred Ch. 13's, I've never seen a Ch 13 Te force a debtor to retire. Remember, Ch. 13 is a WHOLLY VOLUNTARY CHAPTER. If ever your client is not satified with the course of the case, he/she may simply voluntarily dismiss it.
I've had plenty of cases where Ch. 13 Debtors where working two jobs but shortly before filing, quit one of them. I've haven't seen a Ch. 13 Te that would demand that the debtor get back that 2nd job or take another 2nd job!
Ty Takeuchi
Tyson M. Takeuchi
Certified Bankruptcy Specialist * ^
Law Offices of Tyson M. Takeuchi
3699 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 1260
Los Angeles, CA 90010
(213) 637-1866
Fax: (213) 637-0878
* By State Bar of California Bd of Legal Specialization
^ Consumer Bankruptcy Specialist Certified by American Board of Certification
>Reply-To: cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com
>To:
>Subject: [cdcbaa] Voluntary retirement payments in Ch 13
>Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2005 08:25:02 -0700
>
>Has anyone had a case where the debtor could choose to retire, say at age 55 or younger, and then filed a Ch 13. Would the trustee require that the debtor take the "voluntary retirement" even though it is less than it would be at age 65 but more than what the person is making at the person's current job? Thank you. CF
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
a.. Visit your group "cdcbaa" on the web.
b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
cdcbaa-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Thanks Ty. Carolyn
----- Original Message -----
From:
Tyson
M. Takeuchi
To: cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, July 16, 2005 10:02
AM
Subject: RE: [cdcbaa] Voluntary
retirement payments in Ch 13
Caroline,
In ten years and a few hundred Ch. 13's, I've never seen a Ch 13 Te force a
debtor to retire. Remember, Ch. 13 is a WHOLLY VOLUNTARY CHAPTER. If
ever your client is not satified with the course of the case, he/she may simply voluntarily dismiss it.
I've had plenty of cases where Ch. 13 Debtors where working two jobs but
shortly before filing, quit one of them. I've haven't seen a Ch. 13 Te
that would demand that the debtor get back that 2nd job or take another 2nd
job!
Ty Takeuchi
Tyson M. Takeuchi
Certified Bankruptcy
Specialist * ^ Law Offices of Tyson M. Takeuchi 3699 Wilshire
Blvd., Suite 1260 Los Angeles, CA 90010 (213) 637-1866
Fax: (213) 637-0878 * By State Bar
of California Bd of Legal Specialization ^
Consumer Bankruptcy Specialist Certified by American Board oflyn
Fergoda" <cmfergoda@earthlink.net>>Reply-To:
cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com>To:
<cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com>>Subject: [cdcbaa] Voluntary retirement
payments in Ch 13>Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2005 08:25:02
-0700>>Has anyone had a case where the debtor could choose to
retire, say at age 55 or younger, and then filed a Ch 13. Would the trustee
require that the debtor take the "voluntary retirement" even though it is less
than it would be at age 65 but more than what the person is making at the person's current job? Thank you. CF
The post was migrated from Yahoo.
Caroline,
In ten years and a few hundred Ch. 13's, I've never seen a Ch 13 Te force a debtor to retire. Remember, Ch. 13 is a WHOLLY VOLUNTARY CHAPTER. If ever your client is not satified with the course of the case, he/she may simply voluntarily dismiss it.
I've had plenty of cases where Ch. 13 Debtors where working two jobs but shortly before filing, quit one of them. I've haven't seen a Ch. 13 Te that would demand that the debtor get back that 2nd job or take another 2nd job!
Ty Takeuchi
The post was migrated from Yahoo.
Has anyone had a case where the debtor could choose to retire, say at age 55 or younger, and then filed a Ch 13. Would the trustee require that the debtor take the "voluntary retirement" even though it is less than it would be at age 65 but more than what the person is making at the person's current job? Thank you. CF
Has anyone had a case where the debtor could choose
to retire, say at age 55 or younger, and then filed a Ch 13. Would the trustee
require that the debtor take the "voluntary retirement" even though it is less
than it would be at age 65 but more than what the person is making at the
person's current job? Thank you. CF
The post was migrated from Yahoo.