Undisclosed Workers' Comp claim in confirmed 13

Post Reply
Yahoo Bot
Posts: 22904
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2020 11:38 pm


I'm with Mark on this one.


The post was migrated from Yahoo.
Yahoo Bot
Posts: 22904
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2020 11:38 pm


I agree. 703(b)(10) does not mention workers' compensation benefits at all.
M. Erik Clark
[image: BCLogoSmall]
100 N. Barranca Avenue, Suite 250
West Covina, CA 91791
www.blclaw.com
Office: (626) 332-8600
Fax: (626) 332-8644
Board Certified in Consumer Bankruptcy
American Board of Certification
*From:* cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com [mailto:cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com] *On Behalf
Of *Mark J. Markus
*Sent:* Wednesday, April 23, 2014 11:58 AM
*To:* cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com
*Subject:* Re: [cdcbaa] Undisclosed Workers' Comp claim in confirmed 13
I haven't researched this in a while, but which subsection of (b)(10)
applies to workers' compensation benefits? I thought one had to use
704.160 to exempt workers comp. benefits.
*************************
Mark J. Markus
Law Office of Mark J. Markus
*Mailing Address Only:*
11684 Ventura Blvd. PMB #403
Studio City, CA 91604-2652
(818)509-1173 (818)509-1460 (fax)
web: http://www.bklaw.com/
Certified Bankruptcy Law Specialist--The State Bar of California Board of
Legal Specialization
This Firm is a Qualified Federal Debt Relief Agency
________________________________________________
NOTICE: This Electronic Message contains information from the law office of
Mark J. Markus that may be privileged. The information is intended for the
use of the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, note that any
disclosure, copy, distribution or use of the contents of this message is
prohibited.
IRS CIRCULAR 230 NOTICE: To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by
the IRS, we inform you that any U.S. tax advice contained in this
communication (or in any attachment) is not intended or written to be used,
and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the
Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to
another party any transaction or matter addressed in this communication.
On 4/23/2014 11:10 AM, Peter M. Lively wrote:
Yes
No
No
No
Peter M. Lively, J.D., M.B.A.
Law Office of Peter M. Lively * Personal Financial Law Center I
11268 Washington Boulevard, Suite 203, Culver City, California 90230-4647
Telephone: (310) 391-2400 * Toll Free: (800) 307-3328 * Fax: (310) 391-2462
On Tuesday, April 22, 2014 5:59 PM, Jay Fleischman
wrote:
I've got a client in a confirmed Chapter 13 case (703 exemptions); she
disclosed to me just a few days ago that she's got a workers'
compensation claim that recently settled.
A few questions:
1. Am I correct that 703.140(b)(10) will serve to exempt the workers'
compensation award in full?
2. Do I need to move for employment of workers' compensation counsel?
3. Do I need to move for approval of the workers' compensation award?
4. Presuming that (1) is correct, is there any reason for me to amend
the Chapter 13 Plan?
This may all be elementary, but in my former life the answers to (2)
and (3) would be a resounding, "yes." That said, counterparts in NDCA
tell me that the answers are not the same there. A review of the local
rules and forms does not point to an answer.
Thanks for all input.
Jay S. Fleischman, Esq.
Shaev & Fleischman, LLP
I help people get smart solutions to their bill problems.
http://www.ConsumerHelpCentral.com
556 S Fair Oaks Ave Ste 101-152
Pasadena CA 91105-2656
T: 626-808-4343 x704
E: jay@sflawca.com
Email isn't secure, so it's not confidential. By communicating with
me by email, you understand that it's not confidential.

The post was migrated from Yahoo.
Yahoo Bot
Posts: 22904
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2020 11:38 pm


Yes
No
No
No
Law Office of Peter M. Lively * Personal Financial Law Center I
11268 Washington Boulevard, Suite 203, Culver City, California 90230-4647
Telephone: (310) 391-2400* Toll Free: (800) 307-3328 * Fax: (310) 391-2462
On Tuesday, April 22, 2014 5:59 PM, Jay Fleischman wrote:
I've got a client in a confirmed Chapter 13 case (703 exemptions); she
disclosed to me just a few days ago that she's got a workers'
compensation claim that recently settled.
A few questions:
1. Am I correct that 703.140(b)(10) will serve to exempt the workers'
compensation award in full?
2. Do I need to move for employment of workers' compensation counsel?
3. Do I need to move for approval of the workers' compensation award?
4. Presuming that (1) is correct, is there any reason for me to amend
the Chapter 13 Plan?
This may all be elementary, but in my former life the answers to (2)
and (3) would be a resounding, "yes." That said, counterparts in NDCA
tell me that the answers are not the same there. A review of the local
rules and forms does not point to an answer.
Thanks for all input.
Jay S. Fleischman, Esq.
Shaev & Fleischman, LLP
I help people get smart solutions to their bill problems.
http://www.ConsumerHelpCentral.com
556 S Fair Oaks Ave Ste 101-152
Pasadena CA 91105-2656
T: 626-808-4343 x704
E: jay@sflawca.com
Email isn't secure, so it's not confidential. By communicating with
me by email, you understand that it's not confidential.

The post was migrated from Yahoo.
Yahoo Bot
Posts: 22904
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2020 11:38 pm


Debtor must be in 704 to exempt the workers' comp unless you can cover it
under the wildcard. There was a California case that I can't put my fingers
on but it said workers' comp is not considered disability. It is
considered past and/or future wages and future medical and is not covered
under 703.140(b)(10)(c).
Shannon A. Doyle
Attorney at Law
[image: small logo]
100 N. Barranca Avenue, Suite 250
West Covina, CA 91791-1600
Tel: (626) 646-2555
Fax: (626) 332-8644
www.borowitzclark.com
Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If
you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for
delivery of the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this
message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message and
kindly notify the sender by reply email. Please advise immediately if you
or your employer does not consent to Internet email for messages of this
kind. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message that do
not relate to the official business of this firm shall be understood as
neither given nor endorsed by it.
IRS Circular 230 Disclosure: To ensure compliance with Treasury Department
Regulations, we advise you that, unless otherwise expressly indicated, any
federal tax advice contained in this communication was not intended or
written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding
tax-related penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or applicable state
or local tax law provisions or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to
another party any tax-related matter addressed herein.
*From:* cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com [mailto:cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com] *On Behalf
Of *Jay Fleischman
*Sent:* Tuesday, April 22, 2014 5:59 PM
*To:* cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com
*Subject:* [cdcbaa] Undisclosed Workers' Comp claim in confirmed 13
I've got a client in a confirmed Chapter 13 case (703 exemptions); she
disclosed to me just a few days ago that she's got a workers'
compensation claim that recently settled.
A few questions:
1. Am I correct that 703.140(b)(10) will serve to exempt the workers'
compensation award in full?
2. Do I need to move for employment of workers' compensation counsel?
3. Do I need to move for approval of the workers' compensation award?
4. Presuming that (1) is correct, is there any reason for me to amend
the Chapter 13 Plan?
This may all be elementary, but in my former life the answers to (2)
and (3) would be a resounding, "yes." That said, counterparts in NDCA
tell me that the answers are not the same there. A review of the local
rules and forms does not point to an answer.
Thanks for all input.
Jay S. Fleischman, Esq.
Shaev & Fleischman, LLP
I help people get smart solutions to their bill problems.
http://www.ConsumerHelpCentral.com
556 S Fair Oaks Ave Ste 101-152
Pasadena CA 91105-2656
T: 626-808-4343 x704
E: jay@sflawca.com
Email isn't secure, so it's not confidential. By communicating with
me by email, you understand that it's not confidential.

The post was migrated from Yahoo.
Yahoo Bot
Posts: 22904
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2020 11:38 pm


I've got a client in a confirmed Chapter 13 case (703 exemptions); she
disclosed to me just a few days ago that she's got a workers'
compensation claim that recently settled.
A few questions:
1. Am I correct that 703.140(b)(10) will serve to exempt the workers'
compensation award in full?
2. Do I need to move for employment of workers' compensation counsel?
3. Do I need to move for approval of the workers' compensation award?
4. Presuming that (1) is correct, is there any reason for me to amend
the Chapter 13 Plan?
This may all be elementary, but in my former life the answers to (2)
and (3) would be a resounding, "yes." That said, counterparts in NDCA
tell me that the answers are not the same there. A review of the local
rules and forms does not point to an answer.
Thanks for all input.
Jay S. Fleischman, Esq.
Shaev & Fleischman, LLP
I help people get smart solutions to their bill problems.
http://www.ConsumerHelpCentral.com
556 S Fair Oaks Ave Ste 101-152
Pasadena CA 91105-2656
T: 626-808-4343 x704
E: jay@sflawca.com
Email isn't secure, so it's not confidential. By communicating with
me by email, you understand that it's not confidential.

The post was migrated from Yahoo.
Post Reply