.jpg)
motion to dismiss chapter 13
I see no reason to wait because of the 362 motion, however it may be
preferable to stop making payments and let the trustee move for dismissal.
Section 109(g) prevents an individual who has voluntarily dismissed a case
after a 362 motion from being a debtor for 180 days after the voluntary
dismissal. Of course waiting for the stay motion to be granted my buy a
little time as the stay would also end when the case was dismissed.
Link W. Schrader
On Jul 7, 2014 4:10 PM, "Kirk Brennan kirkinhermosa@gmail.com [cdcbaa]" wrote:
>
>
> Any reason for a debtor to wait until an MFRS is granted before moving to
> voluntarily dismiss his case?
> In other words, is it better to voluntarily dismiss the case before or
> after the MFRS is granted?
>
> Thanks,
> --
> Kirk Brennan
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments are for the
> exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are not
> the intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or take action in
> reliance on this message. If you have received this message in error,
> please notify us immediately by return e-mail and promptly delete this
> message and its attachments from your computer system. We do not waive
> attorney-client or work product privilege by the transmission of this
> message.
> TAX ADVICE NOTICE: Tax advice, if any, contained in this e-mail does not
> constitute a "reliance opinion" as defined in IRS Circular 230 and may not
> be used to establish reasonable reliance on the opinion of counsel for the
> purpose of avoiding the penalty imposed by Section 6662A of the Internal
> Revenue Code. The firm provides reliance opinions only in formal opinion
> letters containing the signature of a director.
>
>
I see no reason to wait because of the 362 motion, however it may be preferable to stop making payments and let the trustee move for dismissal. Section 109(g) prevents an individual who has voluntarily dismissed a case after a 362 motion from being a debtor for 180 days after the voluntary dismissal. Of course waiting for the stay motion to be granted my buy a little time as the stay would also end when the case was dismissed.
Link W. Schrader
On Jul 7, 2014 4:10 PM, "Kirk Brennan kirkinhermosa@gmail.com [cdcbaa]" <cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
Any reason for a debtor to wait until an MFRS is granted before moving to voluntarily dismiss his case?In other words, is it better to voluntarily dismiss the case before or after the MFRS is granted?
Thanks,-- Kirk BrennanCONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments are for the exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or take action in reliance on this message. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail and promptly delete this message and its attachments from your computer system. We do not waive attorney-client or work product privilege by the transmission of this message.
TAX ADVICE NOTICE: Tax advice, if any, contained in this e-mail does not constitute a "reliance opinion" as defined in IRS Circular 230 and may not be used to establish reasonable reliance on the opinion of counsel for the purpose of avoiding the penalty imposed by Section 6662A of the Internal Revenue Code. The firm provides reliance opinions only in formal opinion letters containing the signature of a director.
The post was migrated from Yahoo.
109(g)(2) in case not remembering was bugging you.
Sincerely,
Michael Avanesian
Law Offices of David A. Tilem
www.tilemlaw.com
818-507-6000
On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 6:23 AM, R Grace Rodriguez rgracelaw@gmail.com
[cdcbaa] wrote:
>
>
> I tried that at case got dismissed with a bar. I wouldn't advise it. I
> think there is a rule about it.
>
> Renay
>
>
>
109(g)(2) in case not remembering was bugging you.
Sincerely, Michael AvanesianLaw Offices of David A. Tilem
The post was migrated from Yahoo.
I tried that at case got dismissed with a bar. I wouldn't advise it. I
think there is a rule about it.
I tried that at case got dismissed with a bar. I wouldn't advise it. I think there is a rule about it.
The post was migrated from Yahoo.
Any reason for a debtor to wait until an MFRS is granted before moving to
voluntarily dismiss his case?
In other words, is it better to voluntarily dismiss the case before or
after the MFRS is granted?
Thanks,
Kirk Brennan
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments are for the
exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are not
the intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or take action in
reliance on this message. If you have received this message in error,
please notify us immediately by return e-mail and promptly delete this
message and its attachments from your computer system. We do not waive
attorney-client or work product privilege by the transmission of this
message.
TAX ADVICE NOTICE: Tax advice, if any, contained in this e-mail does not
constitute a "reliance opinion" as defined in IRS Circular 230 and may not
be used to establish reasonable reliance on the opinion of counsel for the
purpose of avoiding the penalty imposed by Section 6662A of the Internal
Revenue Code. The firm provides reliance opinions only in formal opinion
letters containing the signature of a director.
Any reason for a debtor to wait until an MFRS is granted before moving to voluntarily dismiss his case?In other words, is it better to voluntarily dismiss the case before or after the MFRS is granted?
Thanks,-- Kirk BrennanCONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments are for the exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or take action in reliance on this message. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail and promptly delete this message and its attachments from your computer system. We do not waive attorney-client or work product privilege by the transmission of this message.
TAX ADVICE NOTICE: Tax advice, if any, contained in this e-mail does not constitute a "reliance opinion" as defined in IRS Circular 230 and may not be used to establish reasonable reliance on the opinion of counsel for the purpose of avoiding the penalty imposed by Section 6662A of the Internal Revenue Code. The firm provides reliance opinions only in formal opinion letters containing the signature of a director.
The post was migrated from Yahoo.