.jpg)
Reply-To: Cameron Totten
X-Original-Return-Path: Cameron Totten
To: cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com
X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: groups-system
The post was migrated from Yahoo.
Court Order confirming that the refinancing of discharge
I have not done it but if I was faced with that situation, I would just
file it. Motion for Order Confirming Lender May Refinance Obligation
against Real Property Without Violating Discharge Injunction.
Explain the situation so that court is sympathetic. I would recommend
against having a caption like what you wrote in the subject line.
Refinancing Discharged Debt has a negative connotation.
In the prayer you may also want to include, "or in the alternative, for the
Court to deny this motion because it is clear that refinancing a lien on
property would not violate the discharge injunction." I have had Judge Kwan
deny my emergency motion to open a case. He just opened the case and set my
OSC for hearing.
I am making this stuff up though but it should work.
Sincerely,
*Michael Avanesian, Esq. *
Simon Resnik Hayes, LLP
15233 Ventura Blvd., Suite 250
Sherman Oaks, CA 91403
Tel: 818.783.6251 | Cel: 818.817.1725
*Confidentiality**: *This electronic transmission and its contents are
legally privileged and confidential information and intended solely for the
use of the addressee. If the reader of this message is not the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution,
copying or other use of this message and its contents is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please reply
to us immediately and delete this message from your directory.
*IRS Circular 230 Disclosure:* To ensure compliance with requirements
imposed by the IRS, please be advised that any U.S. federal tax advice
contained in this communication (including any attachments) is not intended
or written to be used or relied upon, and cannot be used or relied upon,
for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code,
or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any
transaction or matter addressed herein.
On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 8:26 AM, Catherine Christiansen
christiansenlaw@yahoo.com [cdcbaa] wrote:
>
>
> I have used the court forms and submitted the order at the same time. No
> hearing. It is automatic. I did this because the lender refused to
> negotiate loan modification without this comfort order.
>
>
> Law Office of Catherine Christiansen
> Certified Specialist, Bankruptcy Law, The State Bar of California Board of
> Legal Specialization.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thursday, April 9, 2015 3:43 PM, "nancy korompis korompisn@yahoo.com
> [cdcbaa]" wrote:
>
>
>
> Has anyone had any experience on obtaining this from the court?
>
> This was an alternative request by lender to reaffirming the mortgage debt.
>
> Thank you.
>
> Best regards,
>
>
> Nancy Korompis
> Tel: (626) 716-7763
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------> This communication (including any attachments) is intended for use by the
> intended recipient(s) only and may contain information that is
> confidential, privileged or legally protected. Any unauthorized use or
> dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
> received this communication in error, please immediately notify the sender
> by return e-mail and delete all copies of the original communication. Thank
> you.
>
>
>
>
I have not done it but if I was faced with that situation, I would just file it. Motion for Order Confirming Lender May Refinance Obligation against Real Property Without Violating Discharge Injunction.Explain the situation so that court is sympathetic. I would recommend against having a caption like what you wrote in the subject line. Refinancing Discharged Debt has a negative connotation.In the prayer you may also want to include, "or in the alternative, for the Court to deny this motion because it is clear that refinancing a lien on property would not violate the discharge injunction." I have had Judge Kwan deny my emergency motion to open a case. He just opened the case and set my OSC for hearing.I am making this stuff up though but it should work.Sincerely,Michael Avanesian, Esq.Simon Resnik Hayes, LLP15233 Ventura Blvd., Suite 250Sherman Oaks, CA 91403Tel: 818.783.6251 | Cel: 818.817.1725Confidentiality:This electronic transmission and its contents are legally privileged and confidential information and intended solely for the use of the addressee. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying or other use of this message and its contents is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please reply to us immediately and delete this message from your directory.IRS Circular 230 Disclosure:To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS, please be advised that any U.S. federal tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments) is not intended or written to be used or relied upon, and cannot be used or relied upon, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code, or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein.
On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 8:26 AM, Catherine Christiansen christiansenlaw@yahoo.com [cdcbaa] <cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
The post was migrated from Yahoo.
Nancy: Is that anything like Stripped 2nd lenders coming forward after
lien strip after the Chapter 13 Plan is over and offering debtors to settle
their debt for pennies? Or offering loan modification? Sneaky huh?
R. Grace Rodriguez, Esq.
Full service Real Estate Attorney &
California State Bar
Certified Bankruptcy Specialist
OFF: (818) 734-7223
CEL: (818) 554-9922
NO EX-PARTE NOTICE VIA VOICE MAIL OR EMAIL: I do not accept notice for *Ex
Parte* Applications via voicemail or by email. You must comply with
California Law and give notice to a person in my office during regular
business hours.
CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: This message contains privileged and
confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If
you are not the intended recipient you should not disseminate, distribute,
store, print, copy or deliver this message. Please notify the sender
immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and
delete this e-mail from your system.
IRS CIRCULAR 230 DISCLOSURE: To comply with requirements imposed by the
Department of the Treasury, we inform you that any U.S. tax advice
contained in this communication (including any attachments) is not
intended or written by the practitioner to be used, and that it cannot be
used by any taxpayer, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties
that may be imposed on the taxpayer, and (ii) supporting the
promotion or marketing of any transactions or matters addressed herein.
On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 3:43 PM, nancy korompis korompisn@yahoo.com [cdcbaa]
wrote:
>
>
> Has anyone had any experience on obtaining this from the court?
>
> This was an alternative request by lender to reaffirming the mortgage debt.
>
> Thank you.
>
> Best regards,
>
>
> Nancy Korompis
> Tel: (626) 716-7763
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------> This communication (including any attachments) is intended for use by the
> intended recipient(s) only and may contain information that is
> confidential, privileged or legally protected. Any unauthorized use or
> dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
> received this communication in error, please immediately notify the sender
> by return e-mail and delete all copies of the original communication. Thank
> you.
>
>
>
Nancy: Is that anything like Stripped 2nd lenders coming forward after lien strip after the Chapter 13 Plan is over and offering debtors to settle their debt for pennies? Or offering loan modification? Sneaky huh?R. Grace Rodriguez, Esq.Full service Real Estate Attorney &
The post was migrated from Yahoo.