Reaffirmations Binding on Lender

Post Reply
Yahoo Bot
Posts: 22904
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2020 11:38 pm


Dear Gerry,
If the judge entered an order approving the reaffirmation agreement, then O (I assume it is Ocwen see my recent blog post http://www.southerncalif
The post was migrated from Yahoo.
Yahoo Bot
Posts: 22904
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2020 11:38 pm


Group,
PCs executed a timely reaffirmation agreement signed by their attorney to
reaffirm a mortgage, which was executed by the lender and timely filed with
the court.
It was not a joint filing; his spouse was not eligible due to a prior
bankruptcy within the past 8 years.
The reaff was prepared by the lender ("O"), and it substantially modified
(to the benefit of the debtor) the terms of the loan.
The lender now disavows the reaff and insists on the terms originally agreed
to.
After reviewing 524(c ) etc, I now believe the reaff should be binding on
the lender, as to both client and spouse, and now I believe I should be
filing my motion for an OSC (using the format provided by Nicholas
Gebelt---thank you!) re: contempt against the lender for violating the terms
of the reaff and the discharge injunction.
This is a case of first impression for me. Does anyone have experience with
this issue.
Gerry
Gerald McNally
McNally & Associates, P.C.
517 East Wilson Ave., Ste 104
Glendale, CA 91206
818.507.5100
Fax: 818.507.5001
Notice to Recipient: This email is meant for only the intended recipient of
the transmission and may be a communication privileged by law. If you
received this email in error, and review, use, dissemination, distribution
or copying of this email is strictly prohibited. Please notify us
immediately of the error by return email and please delete this message and
any and all duplicates of this message from your system. Thank you in
advance for your cooperation.
IRS Circular 230 Disclosure: In order to comply with the requirements
imposed by the Internal Revenue Service, we inform you that any U.S. tax
advice contained in this communication (including any attachments) is not
intended to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding
penalties under the Internal Revenue code or (ii) promoting, marketing or
recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein.

The post was migrated from Yahoo.
Post Reply