.jpg)
Credit Counseling class taken after case filed
In re Manalad, LA 05-50112 VZ (2007). While 8 other judges signed on to
some or all of the opinion, it's not binding authority, and some courts will
interpret 109h1 strictly, dismissing the case.
Hale
_____
The post was migrated from Yahoo.
I had a similar case in Woodland Hills.
I checked the number 3 on form B1D and explained the reason why my client didnt take the credit counseling class before she filed the petition.
It worked, nothing happened and the client got a discharge.
Juliana C. Ferraz, Esq.
Law Office of Juliana C. Ferraz
6320 Canoga Ave., 15th Floor
Woodland Hills, CA 91367
P: 818.370.3226
www.ferrazlaw.com
On Apr 23, 2015, at 11:50 AM, 'Peter M. Lively' petermlively2000@yahoo.com [cdcbaa] wrote:
>
> Most judges will set an OSC re dismissal regarding the missing certificate and then allow the case to proceed if there is a reasonable explanation for the omission.
>
> Peter M. Lively, J.D., M.B.A.
> Law Office of Peter M. Lively * Personal Financial Law Center I
> 11268 Washington Boulevard, Suite 203, Culver City, California 90230-4647
> Telephone: (310) 391-2400 * Toll Free: (800) 307-3328 * Fax: (310) 391-2462
>
>
>
> On Thursday, April 23, 2015 11:34 AM, "Kirk Brennan kirkinhermosa@gmail.com [cdcbaa]" wrote:
>
>
>
> PC filed pro se case. PC took the Credit Counseling class 2 days after she filed her case. Credit counseling certificate has been filed.
> Will the taking of the Credit Counseling class after the case was filed result in automatic dismissal of the case? Or is there a way to salvage the case?
>
> --
> Kirk Brennan
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments are for the exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or take action in reliance on this message. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail and promptly delete this message and its attachments from your computer system. We do not waive attorney-client or work product privilege by the transmission of this message.
> TAX ADVICE NOTICE: Tax advice, if any, contained in this e-mail does not constitute a "reliance opinion" as defined in IRS Circular 230 and may not be used to establish reasonable reliance on the opinion of counsel for the purpose of avoiding the penalty imposed by Section 6662A of the Internal Revenue Code. The firm provides reliance opinions only in formal opinion letters containing the signature of a director.
>
>
>
>
I had a similar case in Woodland Hills.I checked the number 3 on form B1D and explained the reason why my client didnt take the credit counseling class before she filed the petition.It worked, nothing happened and the client got a discharge.
Juliana C. Ferraz, Esq.Law Office of Juliana C. Ferraz6320 Canoga Ave., 15th FloorWoodland Hills, CA 91367P: 818.370.3226www.ferrazlaw.com
On Apr 23, 2015, at 11:50 AM, 'Peter M. Lively' petermlively2000@yahoo.com [cdcbaa] <cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com> wrote:Most judges will set an OSC re dismissal regarding the missing certificate and then allow the case to proceed if there is a reasonable explanation for the omission. Peter M. Lively, J.D., M.B.A.Law Office of Peter M. Lively * Personal Financial Law Center I11268 Washington Boulevard, Suite 203, Culver City, California 90230-4647Telephone: (310) 391-2400 * Toll Free: (800) 307-3328 * Fax: (310) 391-2462
The post was migrated from Yahoo.
Most judges will set an OSC re dismissal regarding the missing certificate and thenallow the case to proceed if there is a reasonable explanation for the omission.Peter M. Lively, J.D., M.B.A.
Law Office of Peter M. Lively * Personal Financial Law Center I
11268 Washington Boulevard, Suite 203, Culver City, California 90230-4647
Telephone: (310) 391-2400* Toll Free: (800) 307-3328 * Fax: (310) 391-2462
On Thursday, April 23, 2015 11:34 AM, "Kirk Brennan kirkinhermosa@gmail.com [cdcbaa]" wrote:
PC filed pro se case. PC took the Credit Counseling class 2 days after she filed her case. Credit counseling certificate has been filed.
Will the taking of the Credit Counseling class after the case was filed result in automatic dismissal of the case? Or is there a way to salvage the case?
Kirk Brennan
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments are for the exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or take action in reliance on this message. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail and promptly delete this message and its attachments from your computer system. We do not waive attorney-client or work product privilege by the transmission of this message.
TAX ADVICE NOTICE: Tax advice, if any, contained in this e-mail does not constitute a "reliance opinion" as defined in IRS Circular 230 and may not be used to establish reasonable reliance on the opinion of counsel for the purpose of avoiding the penalty imposed by Section 6662A of the Internal Revenue Code. The firm provides reliance opinions only in formal opinion letters containing the signature of a director.
The post was migrated from Yahoo.
PC filed pro se case. PC took the Credit Counseling class 2 days after she
filed her case. Credit counseling certificate has been filed.
Will the taking of the Credit Counseling class after the case was filed
result in automatic dismissal of the case? Or is there a way to salvage
the case?
Kirk Brennan
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments are for the
exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are not
the intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or take action in
reliance on this message. If you have received this message in error,
please notify us immediately by return e-mail and promptly delete this
message and its attachments from your computer system. We do not waive
attorney-client or work product privilege by the transmission of this
message.
TAX ADVICE NOTICE: Tax advice, if any, contained in this e-mail does not
constitute a "reliance opinion" as defined in IRS Circular 230 and may not
be used to establish reasonable reliance on the opinion of counsel for the
purpose of avoiding the penalty imposed by Section 6662A of the Internal
Revenue Code. The firm provides reliance opinions only in formal opinion
letters containing the signature of a director.
PC filed pro se case. PC took the Credit Counseling class 2 days
after she filed her case. Credit counseling certificate has been filed.Will
the taking of the Credit Counseling class after the case was filed
result in automatic dismissal of the case? Or is there a way to salvage
the case?-- Kirk BrennanCONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments are for the exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or take action in reliance on this message. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail and promptly delete this message and its attachments from your computer system. We do not waive attorney-client or work product privilege by the transmission of this message. TAX ADVICE NOTICE: Tax advice, if any, contained in this e-mail does not constitute a "reliance opinion" as defined in IRS Circular 230 and may not be used to establish reasonable reliance on the opinion of counsel for the purpose of avoiding the penalty imposed by Section 6662A of the Internal Revenue Code. The firm provides reliance opinions only in formal opinion letters containing the signature of a director.
The post was migrated from Yahoo.