New case that relates the recent program on stay/discharg=

Post Reply
Yahoo Bot
Posts: 22904
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2020 11:38 pm


Thanks for sharing this Shannon. It is particularly interesting that the BAP observed a critical distinction between contempt under section 105 vs. section 362(k), and directly implied that the result would be different under 362(k).
As this decision issued only a few days ago, I will pass it along to Judge Bason, since it may not have been brought to his attention just yet.
Gary R. Wallace
Law Office of Gary R. Wallace
4551 Glencoe Avenue, Suite 300
Marina del Rey, CA 90292
Email: garyrwallace@ymail.com
Office: (310) 775-8719
________________________________
hoogroups.com>
To: "cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com"
Sent: Monday, November 3, 2014 8:45 AM
Subject: [cdcbaa] New case that relates the recent program on stay/discharge violations [1 Attachment]
[Attachment(s) from Shannon Doyle included below]
Ruling:
Chapter 7 debtors are not entitled to an award of attorney fees incurred in defending on appeal the bankruptcy courts order finding a creditor in contempt for violating the discharge injunction.

The post was migrated from Yahoo.
Top
Post Reply

Return to “Yahoo Old Posts”