.jpg)
Taking on the Chapter 13 Trustee in Riverside
charset="windows-1251"
Nancy:
Do you want cases which talk about how lawyers should not have to finance
their cases? How about cases which talk about parity in legal fees with
non-bankruptcy lawyers? There is even some really good legislative history
for the 1978 law.
David A. Tilem
Certified Bankruptcy Specialist*
Law Offices of David A. Tilem (a debt relief agency)
206 N. Jackson Street, #201, Glendale, CA 91206
Tel: 818-507-6000 Fax: 818-507-6800
* Bankruptcy specialist cert. by State Bar of CA Bd of Legal
Specialization.
Nancy Clark
Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2010 3:58 PM
To: cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [cdcbaa] Taking on the Chapter 13 Trustee in Riverside
Im not sure if it was Judge Naugle or Rod who pushed for a local local rule
limiting attorneys to 50% of the plan payments, but that is the case in
Riverside. I have not taken this on. I am going to start with the
supplemental fees and move on from there.
Again, if anyone has any cases to share, let me know.
Thanks,
Nancy Clark
Borowitz & Clark, LLP
100 N. Barranca Avenue, Suite 250
West Covina, CA 91791
www.BLClaw.com
Office: (626) 332-8600
Fax: (626) 332-8644
The post was migrated from Yahoo.
e-mail me outside the group and I will get you the information for the attorney who took him on the same issue and won. I told him and he would be glad to share the brief with you.
Stella Havkin
>
> I'm not sure if it was Judge Naugle or Rod who pushed for a local local
> rule limiting attorneys to 50% of the plan payments, but that is the
> case in Riverside. I have not taken this on. I am going to start with
> the supplemental fees and move on from there.
>
>
>
> Again, if anyone has any cases to share, let me know.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> Nancy Clark
> Borowitz & Clark, LLP
> 100 N. Barranca Avenue, Suite 250
> West Covina, CA 91791
> www.BLClaw.com
> Office: (626) 332-8600
> Fax: (626) 332-8644
>
>
>
>
>
> Of Steven B. Lever
> Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2010 2:35 PM
> To: cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: RE: [cdcbaa] Taking on the Chapter 13 Trustee in Riverside
>
>
>
>
>
> I did specify 100% and I'll have to see what they do on the recently
> confirmed case. On the only other I'd have to do some accounting. I
> was just told by one of Rod's attorneys that they only pay 50%. If this
> is a false issue, then I apologize.
>
>
>
> Of Giovanni Orantes
> Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2010 2:34 PM
> To: cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [cdcbaa] Taking on the Chapter 13 Trustee in Riverside
>
>
>
>
>
> Are you sure you haven't been paid less than 50% because your plan did
> not expressly specify 100% in the appropriate box? I believe I have
> always received full 100% payments in my Riverside plans.
>
> On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 2:22 PM, Steven B. Lever
> wrote:
>
>
>
> Yeah, Nancy! What about the fact they also just pay 50% of each plan
> payment toward our regular RARA allowed fees? That's another one I'm
> not sure how they get the authority to do that.
>
>
>
> Of nancybonaccorso
> Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2010 1:53 PM
> To: cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [cdcbaa] Taking on the Chapter 13 Trustee in Riverside
>
>
>
>
>
> I have decided to take on the chapter 13 trustee regarding supplemental
> fees. As those of you who practice in Riverside know, the chapter 13
> trustee out there has established a no look fee schedule for all matters
> in chapter 13. They have kept the fees to attorneys down for years. I
> would like to take on this issue since there are two new Judges assigned
> to the bench.
>
> On a motion to value the trustee states that the avearage fee
> application in the district is about $400-$500 (In re Eliapo) and they
> object absent any proof of extraordinary circumstances. In re Lynn. They
> are also stating that we have charged less in this division for all our
> other cases and site different cases we have filed. Of course, I can
> site to lots of cases in LA, WH and SA. Where we received more.
>
> If anyone can thing of any case I must include in my brief please feel
> free to let me know.
>
> Thanks,
> Nancy B. Clark
> Borowitz & Clark, LLP
> 100 N. Barranca Avenue, Suite 250
> West Covina, CA 91791
> Tel. (626)332-8600
> Fax (626)332-8644
>
>
>
>
> --
> Giovanni Orantes, Esq.
> Orantes Law Firm, P.C.
> 3435 Wilshire Blvd. Suite 1980
> Los Angeles, CA 90010
> Tel: (213) 389-4362
> Phone: (888) 619-8222 x101
> Fax: (877) 789-5776
> e-mail: go@...
> website: www.gobklaw.com
>
> WE ARE A "DEBT RELIEF AGENCY" AS DEFINED BY FEDERAL LAW.
>
> SERVING BAKERSFIELD, LOS ANGELES, ORANGE COUNTY, RIVERSIDE, SAN
> BERNARDINO AND SANTA BARBARA.
>
> Note: The information contained in this e-mail message is confidential
> information intended only for the use of the individual or entity named.
> If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or an agent
> responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby
> notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this
> communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
> communication in error, please immediately notify us by telephone or
> e-mail and delete the original e-mail - at (213) 389-4362 or (888)
> 619-8222.
>
> IRS Circular 230 Disclosure: In order to comply with requirements
> imposed by the Internal Revenue Service, we inform you that any U.S. tax
> advice contained in this communication (including any attachments) is
> not intended to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i)
> avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting,
> marketing, or recommending to another party any transaction or matter
> addressed herein.
>
The post was migrated from Yahoo.
I'm not sure if it was Judge Naugle or Rod who pushed for a local local
rule limiting attorneys to 50% of the plan payments, but that is the
case in Riverside. I have not taken this on. I am going to start with
the supplemental fees and move on from there.
Again, if anyone has any cases to share, let me know.
Thanks,
Nancy Clark
Borowitz & Clark, LLP
100 N. Barranca Avenue, Suite 250
West Covina, CA 91791
www.BLClaw.com
Office: (626) 332-8600
Fax: (626) 332-8644
The post was migrated from Yahoo.
charset="windows-1251"
Yeah!
David A. Tilem
Certified Bankruptcy Specialist*
Law Offices of David A. Tilem (a debt relief agency)
206 N. Jackson Street, #201, Glendale, CA 91206
Tel: 818-507-6000 Fax: 818-507-6800
* Bankruptcy specialist cert. by State Bar of CA Bd of Legal
Specialization.
nancybonaccorso
Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2010 1:53 PM
To: cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [cdcbaa] Taking on the Chapter 13 Trustee in Riverside
I have decided to take on the chapter 13 trustee regarding supplemental
fees. As those of you who practice in Riverside know, the chapter 13 trustee
out there has established a no look fee schedule for all matters in chapter
13. They have kept the fees to attorneys down for years. I would like to
take on this issue since there are two new Judges assigned to the bench.
On a motion to value the trustee states that the avearage fee application in
the district is about $400-$500 (In re Eliapo) and they object absent any
proof of extraordinary circumstances. In re Lynn. They are also stating that
we have charged less in this division for all our other cases and site
different cases we have filed. Of course, I can site to lots of cases in LA,
WH and SA. Where we received more.
If anyone can thing of any case I must include in my brief please feel free
to let me know.
Thanks,
Nancy B. Clark
Borowitz & Clark, LLP
100 N. Barranca Avenue, Suite 250
West Covina, CA 91791
Tel. (626)332-8600
Fax (626)332-8644
charset="windows-1251"
Message
Yeah!
David A.
Tilem
Certified Bankruptcy
Specialist*
The post was migrated from Yahoo.
I did specify 100% and I'll have to see what they do on the recently
confirmed case. On the only other I'd have to do some accounting. I
was just told by one of Rod's attorneys that they only pay 50%. If this
is a false issue, then I apologize.
The post was migrated from Yahoo.
Are you sure you haven't been paid less than 50% because your plan did not
expressly specify 100% in the appropriate box? I believe I have always
received full 100% payments in my Riverside plans.
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 2:22 PM, Steven B. Lever wrote:
>
>
> Yeah, Nancy! What about the fact they also just pay 50% of each plan
> payment toward our regular RARA allowed fees? Thats another one Im not
> sure how they get the authority to do that.
>
>
>
> *From:* cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com [mailto:cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com] *On Behalf
> Of *nancybonaccorso
> *Sent:* Wednesday, June 23, 2010 1:53 PM
> *To:* cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com
> *Subject:* [cdcbaa] Taking on the Chapter 13 Trustee in Riverside
>
>
>
>
>
> I have decided to take on the chapter 13 trustee regarding supplemental
> fees. As those of you who practice in Riverside know, the chapter 13 trustee
> out there has established a no look fee schedule for all matters in chapter
> 13. They have kept the fees to attorneys down for years. I would like to
> take on this issue since there are two new Judges assigned to the bench.
>
> On a motion to value the trustee states that the avearage fee application
> in the district is about $400-$500 (In re Eliapo) and they object absent any
> proof of extraordinary circumstances. In re Lynn. They are also stating that
> we have charged less in this division for all our other cases and site
> different cases we have filed. Of course, I can site to lots of cases in LA,
> WH and SA. Where we received more.
>
> If anyone can thing of any case I must include in my brief please feel free
> to let me know.
>
> Thanks,
> Nancy B. Clark
> Borowitz & Clark, LLP
> 100 N. Barranca Avenue, Suite 250
> West Covina, CA 91791
> Tel. (626)332-8600
> Fax (626)332-8644
>
>
>
Giovanni Orantes, Esq.
Orantes Law Firm, P.C.
3435 Wilshire Blvd. Suite 1980
Los Angeles, CA 90010
Tel: (213) 389-4362
Phone: (888) 619-8222 x101
Fax: (877) 789-5776
e-mail: go@gobklaw.com
website: www.gobklaw.com
WE ARE A "DEBT RELIEF AGENCY" AS DEFINED BY FEDERAL LAW.
SERVING BAKERSFIELD, LOS ANGELES, ORANGE COUNTY, RIVERSIDE, SAN BERNARDINO
AND SANTA BARBARA.
Note: The information contained in this e-mail message is confidential
information intended only for the use of the individual or entity named. If
the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or an agent
responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby
notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this communication
is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error,
please immediately notify us by telephone or e-mail and delete the original
e-mail at (213) 389-4362 or (888) 619-8222.
IRS Circular 230 Disclosure: In order to comply with requirements imposed by
the Internal Revenue Service, we inform you that any U.S. tax advice
contained in this communication (including any attachments) is not intended
to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties
under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing, or
recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein.
Are you sure you haven't been paid less than 50% because your plan did not expressly specify 100% in the appropriate box? I believe I have always received full 100% payments in my Riverside plans.
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 2:22 PM, Steven B. Lever <sblever@leverlaw.com> wrote:
Yeah, Nancy!
What about the fact they also just pay 50% of each plan payment toward our
regular RARA allowed fees? Thats another one Im not sure
how they get the authority to do that.
From:
cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com [mailto:cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of nancybonaccorso
Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2010 1:53 PM
To: cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [cdcbaa] Taking on the Chapter 13 Trustee in Riverside
I have decided
to take on the chapter 13 trustee regarding supplemental fees. As those of you
who practice in Riverside know, the chapter 13 trustee out there has
established a no look fee schedule for all matters in chapter 13. They have
kept the fees to attorneys down for years. I would like to take on this issue
since there are two new Judges assigned to the bench.
On a motion to value the trustee states that the avearage fee application in
the district is about $400-$500 (In re Eliapo) and they object absent any proof
of extraordinary circumstances. In re Lynn. They are also stating that we have
charged less in this division for all our other cases and site different cases
we have filed. Of course, I can site to lots of cases in LA, WH and SA. Where we
received more.
If anyone can thing of any case I must include in my brief please feel free to
let me know.
Thanks,
Nancy B. Clark
Borowitz & Clark, LLP
100 N. Barranca Avenue, Suite 250
West Covina, CA 91791
Tel. (626)332-8600
Fax (626)332-8644
-- Giovanni Orantes, Esq. Orantes Law Firm, P.C.3435 Wilshire Blvd. Suite 1980Los Angeles, CA 90010Tel: (213) 389-4362Phone: (888) 619-8222 x101Fax: (877) 789-5776
e-mail: go@gobklaw.comwebsite: www.gobklaw.comWE ARE A "DEBT RELIEF AGENCY" AS DEFINED BY FEDERAL LAW.SERVING BAKERSFIELD, LOS ANGELES, ORANGE COUNTY, RIVERSIDE, SAN BERNARDINO AND SANTA BARBARA.
Note: The information contained in this e-mail message is confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity named. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or an agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify us by telephone or e-mail and delete the original e-mail IRS Circular 230 Disclosure: In order to comply with requirements imposed by the Internal Revenue Service, we inform you that any U.S. tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments) is not intended to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing, or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein.
The post was migrated from Yahoo.
I have decided to take on the chapter 13 trustee regarding supplemental fees. As those of you who practice in Riverside know, the chapter 13 trustee out there has established a no look fee schedule for all matters in chapter 13. They have kept the fees to attorneys down for years. I would like to take on this issue since there are two new Judges assigned to the bench.
On a motion to value the trustee states that the avearage fee application in the district is about $400-$500 (In re Eliapo) and they object absent any proof of extraordinary circumstances. In re Lynn. They are also stating that we have charged less in this division for all our other cases and site different cases we have filed. Of course, I can site to lots of cases in LA, WH and SA. Where we received more.
If anyone can thing of any case I must include in my brief please feel free to let me know.
Thanks,
Nancy B. Clark
Borowitz & Clark, LLP
100 N. Barranca Avenue, Suite 250
West Covina, CA 91791
Tel. (626)332-8600
Fax (626)332-8644
The post was migrated from Yahoo.