BK, divorce, child/spousal support

Post Reply
Yahoo Bot
Posts: 22904
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2020 11:38 pm


But there still is a division of property issue under 523(a)(15). I think the "breach of fiduciary duty" only goes to support a claim for an unequal division of CP.
>
> Sorry, divorce atty cannot deal with fraud in State Court - it has been
> discharged in H's bankruptcy.
> breach of fiduciary duty is not a support obligation so 523a5 does not work.
>
>
> David A. Tilem
> Certified Bankruptcy Specialist*
> Law Offices of David A. Tilem (a debt relief agency)
> 206 N. Jackson Street, #201, Glendale, CA 91206
> Tel: 818-507-6000 Fax: 818-507-6800
>
> * Bankruptcy specialist cert. by State Bar of CA Bd of Legal
> Specialization.
> Business bankruptcy specialist cert. by Amer. Bd. of Certification
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> Matthew Gary Evans
> Sent: Monday, December 14, 2009 8:15 AM
> To: cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: RE: [cdcbaa] BK, divorce, child/spousal support
>
>
>
>
>
> Right. What about 523a5 (domestic support). Has anyone ever successfully
> argued that reimbursement of community funds misappropriated by the debtor
> through fraud or breach of fiduciary duty constitutes domestic support?
>
> I just want to move for relief from stay and let the divorce attorney deal
> with the fraud issue in that court. This is ultimately, after all, a state
> law issue (family court).
>
> ____________________________________
>
> Law Office of Matthew Gary Evans
>
> Matthew Gary Evans, Esq.
>
> 16 North Marengo Avenue, Room 219
>
> Pasadena, California 91101
>
> Tel.: (626) 405-9448
>
> Fax: (626) 768-7565
>
> Cell: (213) 842-6645
>
> Email:
> matthew@...
>
> www.matthewgaryevanslaw.com
>
> www.matthewgaryevanslaw.net/Bankruptcy
>
> please visit my blog at
> matthewevanslaw.wordpress.com
>
> Member: California State Bar, American Bar Association, Consumer Attorneys
> Association of Los Angeles, Central District Consumer Bankruptcy Attorneys
> Association, National Association of Consumer Bankruptcy Attorneys, Pasadena
> Chamber of Commerce
>
> NOTICE: This message is intended only for the individual named. If you are
> not the named addressee please do not disseminate, print, or copy this
> e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail if you have
> received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system.
> Thank you.
>
> David A. Tilem
> Sent: Monday, December 14, 2009 8:01 AM
> To: cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: RE: [cdcbaa] BK, divorce, child/spousal support
>
>
>
> That option, an action under 523(a)(4) is now off the table.
>
> David A. Tilem
>
> Certified Bankruptcy Specialist*
>
> Law Offices of David A. Tilem (a debt relief agency)
>
> 206 N. Jackson Street, #201, Glendale, CA 91206
>
> Tel: 818-507-6000 Fax: 818-507-6800
>
> * Bankruptcy specialist cert. by State Bar of CA Bd of Legal
> Specialization.
>
> Business bankruptcy specialist cert. by Amer. Bd. of Certification
>
> -----Original Message-----
> Matthew Gary Evans
> Sent: Sunday, December 13, 2009 8:17 AM
> To: cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: RE: [cdcbaa] BK, divorce, child/spousal support
>
>
>
> The 523 deadline was 8/3/09.
>
> ____________________________________
>
> Law Office of Matthew Gary Evans
>
> Matthew Gary Evans, Esq.
>
> 16 North Marengo Avenue, Room 219
>
> Pasadena, California 91101
>
> Tel.: (626) 405-9448
>
> Fax: (626) 768-7565
>
> Cell: (213) 842-6645
>
> Email: matthew@matthewgary
> evanslaw.com
>
> www.matthewgaryevanslaw.com
>
> www.matthewgaryevanslaw.net/Bankruptcy
>
> please visit my blog at matthewevanslaw.
> wordpress.com
>
> Member: California State Bar, American Bar Association, Consumer Attorneys
> Association of Los Angeles, Central District Consumer Bankruptcy Attorneys
> Association, National Association of Consumer Bankruptcy Attorneys, Pasadena
> Chamber of Commerce
>
> NOTICE: This message is intended only for the individual named. If you are
> not the named addressee please do not disseminate, print, or copy this
> e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail if you have
> received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system.
> Thank you.
>
> David A. Tilem
> Sent: Friday, December 11, 2009 10:23 AM
> To: cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: RE: [cdcbaa] BK, divorce, child/spousal support
>
>
>
> Matthew:
>
> These divorce cases are very complicated and have lots of moving parts.
>
> Some of your assumptions are incorrect. The OSC is NOT stayed. H's
> discharge will LIKELY not affect W's right to seek attorney fees. Third, W
> may also have a breach of fiduciary duty claim which may also be
> non-dischargeable under 523(a)(4). When is/was the deadline for 523
> actions. Stay in close touch and coordinate with W's divorce attorney. If
> you are over your head, call one of the more senior members for help or
> refer out the case.
>
> David A. Tilem
>
> Certified Bankruptcy Specialist*
>
> Law Offices of David A. Tilem (a debt relief agency)
>
> 206 N. Jackson Street, #201, Glendale, CA 91206
>
> Tel: 818-507-6000 Fax: 818-507-6800
>
> * Bankruptcy specialist cert. by State Bar of CA Bd of Legal
> Specialization.
>
> Business bankruptcy specialist cert. by Amer. Bd. of Certification
>
> -----Original Message-----
> Matthew Gary Evans
> Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2009 9:17 AM
> To: bk@...; cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [cdcbaa] BK, divorce, child/spousal support
>
>
>
> Central District of CA:
>
> H and W were married. H filed for divorce and then filed bk. W now has
> $80k in attorneys fees in the divorce case, and an OSC re awarding W
> attorneys fees is pending, but has been stayed by the bk. My first question
> is whether H's discharge will affect W's ability to obtain a judgment for
> attorneys fees in the divorce.
>
> Secondly, W just found out that H refi'd their home prior to bk to obtain
> cash. W wants to be reimbursed her community property share of that cash.
> I'd appreciate advice on that issue.
>
> Finally, W missed the deadline for filing a proof of claim against the bk
> estate (H filed bk in May 2009). Is there a way she can obtain relief from
> default, etc.? I believe the issue pertaining to the refi is being
> addressed in the divorce case. Should she just file a motion for relief
> from stay?
>
> Thank you.
>
> ____________________________________
>
> Law Office of Matthew Gary Evans
>
> Matthew Gary Evans, Esq.
>
> 16 North Marengo Avenue, Room 219
>
> Pasadena, California 91101
>
> Tel.: (626) 405-9448
>
> Fax: (626) 768-7565
>
> Cell: (213) 842-6645
>
> Email: matthew@matthewgary
> evanslaw.com
>
> www.matthewgaryevanslaw.com
>
> www.matthewgaryevanslaw.net/Bankruptcy
>
> please visit my blog at matthewevanslaw.
> wordpress.com
>
> Member: California State Bar, American Bar Association, Consumer Attorneys
> Association of Los Angeles, Central District Consumer Bankruptcy Attorneys
> Association, National Association of Consumer Bankruptcy Attorneys, Pasadena
> Chamber of Commerce
>
> NOTICE: This message is intended only for the individual named. If you are
> not the named addressee please do not disseminate, print, or copy this
> e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail if you have
> received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system.
> Thank you.
>

The post was migrated from Yahoo.
Yahoo Bot
Posts: 22904
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2020 11:38 pm


charset="windows-1251"
Sorry, divorce atty cannot deal with fraud in State Court - it has been
discharged in H's bankruptcy.
breach of fiduciary duty is not a support obligation so 523a5 does not work.
David A. Tilem
Certified Bankruptcy Specialist*
Law Offices of David A. Tilem (a debt relief agency)
206 N. Jackson Street, #201, Glendale, CA 91206
Tel: 818-507-6000 Fax: 818-507-6800
* Bankruptcy specialist cert. by State Bar of CA Bd of Legal
Specialization.
Matthew Gary Evans
Sent: Monday, December 14, 2009 8:15 AM
To: cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [cdcbaa] BK, divorce, child/spousal support
Right. What about 523a5 (domestic support). Has anyone ever successfully
argued that reimbursement of community funds misappropriated by the debtor
through fraud or breach of fiduciary duty constitutes domestic support?
I just want to move for relief from stay and let the divorce attorney deal
with the fraud issue in that court. This is ultimately, after all, a state
law issue (family court).
____________________________________
Law Office of Matthew Gary Evans
Matthew Gary Evans, Esq.
16 North Marengo Avenue, Room 219
Pasadena, California 91101
Tel.: (626) 405-9448
Fax: (626) 768-7565
Cell: (213) 842-6645
Email:
matthew@matthewgaryevanslaw.com
www.matthewgaryevanslaw.com
www.matthewgaryevanslaw.net/Bankruptcy
please visit my blog at
matthewevanslaw.wordpress.com
Member: California State Bar, American Bar Association, Consumer Attorneys
Association of Los Angeles, Central District Consumer Bankruptcy Attorneys
Association, National Association of Consumer Bankruptcy Attorneys, Pasadena
Chamber of Commerce
NOTICE: This message is intended only for the individual named. If you are
not the named addressee please do not disseminate, print, or copy this
e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail if you have
received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system.
Thank you.

The post was migrated from Yahoo.
Yahoo Bot
Posts: 22904
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2020 11:38 pm


charset="windows-1251"
Right. What about 523a5 (domestic support). Has anyone ever successfully
argued that reimbursement of community funds misappropriated by the debtor
through fraud or breach of fiduciary duty constitutes domestic support?
I just want to move for relief from stay and let the divorce attorney deal
with the fraud issue in that court. This is ultimately, after all, a state
law issue (family court).
____________________________________
Law Office of Matthew Gary Evans
Matthew Gary Evans, Esq.
16 North Marengo Avenue, Room 219
Pasadena, California 91101
Tel.: (626) 405-9448
Fax: (626) 768-7565
Cell: (213) 842-6645
Email:
matthew@matthewgaryevanslaw.com
www.matthewgaryevanslaw.com
www.matthewgaryevanslaw.net/Bankruptcy
please visit my blog at
matthewevanslaw.wordpress.com
Member: California State Bar, American Bar Association, Consumer Attorneys
Association of Los Angeles, Central District Consumer Bankruptcy Attorneys
Association, National Association of Consumer Bankruptcy Attorneys, Pasadena
Chamber of Commerce
NOTICE: This message is intended only for the individual named. If you are
not the named addressee please do not disseminate, print, or copy this
e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail if you have
received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system.
Thank you.

The post was migrated from Yahoo.
Yahoo Bot
Posts: 22904
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2020 11:38 pm


That option, an action under 523(a)(4) is now off the table.
David A. Tilem
Certified Bankruptcy Specialist*
Law Offices of David A. Tilem (a debt relief agency)
206 N. Jackson Street, #201, Glendale, CA 91206
Tel: 818-507-6000 Fax: 818-507-6800
* Bankruptcy specialist cert. by State Bar of CA Bd of Legal
Specialization.
Matthew Gary Evans
Sent: Sunday, December 13, 2009 8:17 AM
To: cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [cdcbaa] BK, divorce, child/spousal support
The 523 deadline was 8/3/09.
____________________________________
Law Office of Matthew Gary Evans
Matthew Gary Evans, Esq.
16 North Marengo Avenue, Room 219
Pasadena, California 91101
Tel.: (626) 405-9448
Fax: (626) 768-7565
Cell: (213) 842-6645
Email:
matthew@matthewgaryevanslaw.com
www.matthewgaryevanslaw.com
www.matthewgaryevanslaw.net/Bankruptcy
please visit my blog at
matthewevanslaw.wordpress.com
Member: California State Bar, American Bar Association, Consumer Attorneys
Association of Los Angeles, Central District Consumer Bankruptcy Attorneys
Association, National Association of Consumer Bankruptcy Attorneys, Pasadena
Chamber of Commerce
NOTICE: This message is intended only for the individual named. If you are
not the named addressee please do not disseminate, print, or copy this
e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail if you have
received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system.
Thank you.

The post was migrated from Yahoo.
Yahoo Bot
Posts: 22904
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2020 11:38 pm


charset="windows-1251"
The 523 deadline was 8/3/09.
____________________________________
Law Office of Matthew Gary Evans
Matthew Gary Evans, Esq.
16 North Marengo Avenue, Room 219
Pasadena, California 91101
Tel.: (626) 405-9448
Fax: (626) 768-7565
Cell: (213) 842-6645
Email:
matthew@matthewgaryevanslaw.com
www.matthewgaryevanslaw.com
www.matthewgaryevanslaw.net/Bankruptcy
please visit my blog at
matthewevanslaw.wordpress.com
Member: California State Bar, American Bar Association, Consumer Attorneys
Association of Los Angeles, Central District Consumer Bankruptcy Attorneys
Association, National Association of Consumer Bankruptcy Attorneys, Pasadena
Chamber of Commerce
NOTICE: This message is intended only for the individual named. If you are
not the named addressee please do not disseminate, print, or copy this
e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail if you have
received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system.
Thank you.

The post was migrated from Yahoo.
Yahoo Bot
Posts: 22904
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2020 11:38 pm


Matthew:
These divorce cases are very complicated and have lots of moving parts.
Some of your assumptions are incorrect. The OSC is NOT stayed. H's
discharge will LIKELY not affect W's right to seek attorney fees. Third, W
may also have a breach of fiduciary duty claim which may also be
non-dischargeable under 523(a)(4). When is/was the deadline for 523
actions. Stay in close touch and coordinate with W's divorce attorney. If
you are over your head, call one of the more senior members for help or
refer out the case.
David A. Tilem
Certified Bankruptcy Specialist*
Law Offices of David A. Tilem (a debt relief agency)
206 N. Jackson Street, #201, Glendale, CA 91206
Tel: 818-507-6000 Fax: 818-507-6800
* Bankruptcy specialist cert. by State Bar of CA Bd of Legal
Specialization.
Matthew Gary Evans
Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2009 9:17 AM
To: bk@nacba.org; cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [cdcbaa] BK, divorce, child/spousal support
Central District of CA:
H and W were married. H filed for divorce and then filed bk. W now has
$80k in attorneys fees in the divorce case, and an OSC re awarding W
attorneys fees is pending, but has been stayed by the bk. My first question
is whether Hs discharge will affect Ws ability to obtain a judgment for
attorneys fees in the divorce.
Secondly, W just found out that H refid their home prior to bk to obtain
cash. W wants to be reimbursed her community property share of that cash.
Id appreciate advice on that issue.
Finally, W missed the deadline for filing a proof of claim against the bk
estate (H filed bk in May 2009). Is there a way she can obtain relief from
default, etc.? I believe the issue pertaining to the refi is being
addressed in the divorce case. Should she just file a motion for relief
from stay?
Thank you.
____________________________________
Law Office of Matthew Gary Evans
Matthew Gary Evans, Esq.
16 North Marengo Avenue, Room 219
Pasadena, California 91101
Tel.: (626) 405-9448
Fax: (626) 768-7565
Cell: (213) 842-6645
Email: matthew@matthewgary
evanslaw.com
www.matthewgaryevanslaw.com
www.matthewgaryevanslaw.net/Bankruptcy
please visit my blog at matthewevanslaw.
wordpress.com
Member: California State Bar, American Bar Association, Consumer Attorneys
Association of Los Angeles, Central District Consumer Bankruptcy Attorneys
Association, National Association of Consumer Bankruptcy Attorneys, Pasadena
Chamber of Commerce
NOTICE: This message is intended only for the individual named. If you are
not the named addressee please do not disseminate, print, or copy this
e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail if you have
received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system.
Thank you.
Message
Matthew:

These divorce cases are
very complicated and have lots of moving parts.

Some of your assumptions
are incorrect. The OSC is NOT stayed. H's discharge will LIKELY not
affect W's right to seek attorney fees. Third, W may also have a breach of
fiduciary duty claim which may also be non-dischargeable under 523(a)(4).
When is/was the deadline for 523 actions. Stay in close touch and
coordinate with W's divorce attorney. If you are over your head, call one
of the more senior members for help or refer out the case.

David A.
Tilem
Certified Bankruptcy
Specialist*
The post was migrated from Yahoo.
Yahoo Bot
Posts: 22904
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2020 11:38 pm


I believe the following to be correct:
1) Family courtNOT stayedas toentry of ajudgment awardingattoneys fees on OSC, but W is stayedrecollection of said judgment;
2) Division ofbankrutpcyestates property (proceeds of refi loan) must be handled in the bankruptcy court unless relief fromstay is granted to allow the Familycourt to adjudicate same;
3) Since a claim is allowed until an order disallowing is entered, file a claim and wait for the motion to disallowclaim to argueexcusable negligence; perhaps the other side will miss the objection deadline.
David?
Pat?
What do you think?
Peter M. Lively, J.D./M.B.A.
Law Offices of Peter M. Lively
Personal Financial Law Center I
11965 Venice Blvd, Suite 301
Los Angeles, CA 90066-3977
310-899-0630
800-307-DEBT (3328)
Fax: 310-899-0632
A-Bankruptcy-Attorney.com
Personal Financial Law Center II
1706 Newport Boulevard, Suite B
Costa Mesa, California 92627-3073
Telephone: 949-650-DEBT(3328)
THIS MESSAGE IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE USE OF THE INDIVIDUAL OR ENTITY TO WHICH IT IS ADDRESSED, AND MAY CONTAIN INFORMATION THAT IS PRIVILEGED, CONFIDENTIAL AND EXEMPT FROM DISCLOSURE UNDER APPLICABLE LAW. IF THE READER OF THIS MESSAGE IS NOT THE INTENDED RECIPIENT, OR THE EMPLOYEE OR AGENT RESPONSIBLE FOR DELIVERING THE MESSAGE TO THE INTENDED RECIPIENT, YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT ANY DISSEMINATION, DISTRIBUTION OR COPYING OF THIS COMMUNICATION IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. IF YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS COMMUNICATION IN ERROR, PLEASE NOTIFY US IMMEDIATELY BY E-MAIL OR BY TELEPHONE. THANK YOU.
________________________________
To: bk@nacba.org; cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thu, December 10, 2009 9:17:19 AM
Subject: [cdcbaa] BK, divorce, child/spousal support
Central District of CA:
H and W were married. H filed for divorce and then filed bk. W now has $80k in attorneys fees in the divorce case, and an OSC re awarding W attorneys fees is pending, but has been stayed by the bk. My first question is whether Hs discharge will affect Ws ability to obtain a judgment for attorneys fees in the divorce.
Secondly, W just found out that H refid their home prior to bk to obtain cash. W wants to be reimbursed her community property share of that cash. Id appreciate advice on that issue.
Finally, W missed the deadline for filing a proof of claim against the bk estate (H filed bk in May 2009). Is there a way she can obtain relief from default, etc.? I believe the issue pertaining to the refi is being addressed in the divorce case. Should she just file a motion for relief from stay?
Thank you.
____________ _________ _________ ______
Law Office of Matthew Gary Evans
Matthew Gary Evans, Esq.
16 North Marengo Avenue, Room 219
Pasadena, California 91101
Tel.: (626) 405-9448
Fax: (626) 768-7565
Cell: (213) 842-6645
Email: matthew@matthewgary evanslaw. com
www.matthewgaryevan slaw.com
www.matthewgaryevan slaw.net/ Bankruptcy
please visit my blog at matthewevanslaw. wordpress. com
Member: California State Bar, American Bar Association, Consumer Attorneys Association of Los Angeles, Central District Consumer Bankruptcy Attorneys Association, National Association of Consumer Bankruptcy Attorneys, Pasadena Chamber of Commerce
NOTICE: This message is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee please do not disseminate, print, or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. Thank you.
I believe the following to be correct:

1) Family court NOT stayed as to entry of a judgment awarding attoneys fees on OSC, but W is stayed re collection of said judgment;

2) Division of bankrutpcy estates property (proceeds of refi loan) must be handled in the bankruptcy court unless relief from stay is granted to allow the Family court to adjudicate same;

3) Since a claim is allowed until an order disallowing is entered, file a claim and wait for the motion to disallow claim to argue excusable negligence; perhaps the other side will miss the objection deadline.

David?
Pat?
What do you think?

Peter M. Lively, J.D./M.B.A.Law Offices of Peter M. Lively Personal Financial Law Center I11965 Venice Blvd, Suite 301 Los Angeles, CA 90066-3977 310-899-0630 800-307-DEBT (3328)Fax: 310-899-0632 A-Bankruptcy-Attorney.com
Personal Financial Law Center II1706 Newport Boulevard, Suite BCosta Mesa, California 92627-3073Telephone: 949-650-DEBT(3328)
THIS MESSAGE IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE USE OF THE INDIVIDUAL OR ENTITY TO WHICH IT IS ADDRESSED, AND MAY CONTAIN INFORMATION THAT IS PRIVILEGED, CONFIDENTIAL AND EXEMPT FROM DISCLOSURE UNDER APPLICABLE LAW. IF THE READER OF THIS MESSAGE IS NOT THE INTENDED RECIPIENT, OR THE EMPLOYEE OR AGENT RESPONSIBLE FOR DELIVERING THE MESSAGE TO THE INTENDED RECIPIENT, YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT ANY DISSEMINATION, DISTRIBUTION OR COPYING OF THIS COMMUNICATION IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. IF YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS COMMUNICATION IN ERROR, PLEASE NOTIFY US IMMEDIATELY BY E-MAIL OR BY TELEPHONE. THANK YOU.
From: Matthew Gary Evans <matthew@matthewgaryevanslaw.com>To: bk@nacba.org; cdcbaa@yahoogroups.comSent: Thu, December 10, 2009 9:17:19 AMSubject: [cdcbaa] BK, divorce, child/spousal support
Central District of CA:

H and W were married. H filed for divorce and then filed bk. W now has $80k in attorneys fees in the divorce case, and an OSC re awarding W attorneys fees is pending, but has been stayed by the bk. My first question is whether Hor attorneys fees in the divorce.

Secondly, W just found out that H refid their home prior to bk to obtain cash. W wants to be reimbursed her community property share of that cash. I
Finally, W missed the deadline for filing a proof of claim against the bk estate (H filed bk in May 2009). Is there a way she can obtain relief from default, etc.? I believe the issue pertaining to the refi is being addressed in the divorce case. Should she just file a motion for relief from stay?

Thank you.

____________ _________ _________ ______
Law Office of Matthew Gary Evans
Matthew Gary Evans, Esq.
16 North Marengo Avenue, Room 219
Pasadena, California 91101
Tel.: (626) 405-9448
Fax: (626) 768-7565
Cell: (213) 842-6645
Email:
The post was migrated from Yahoo.
Yahoo Bot
Posts: 22904
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2020 11:38 pm


Central District of CA:
H and W were married. H filed for divorce and then filed bk. W now has
$80k in attorneys fees in the divorce case, and an OSC re awarding W
attorneys fees is pending, but has been stayed by the bk. My first question
is whether H's discharge will affect W's ability to obtain a judgment for
attorneys fees in the divorce.
Secondly, W just found out that H refi'd their home prior to bk to obtain
cash. W wants to be reimbursed her community property share of that cash.
I'd appreciate advice on that issue.
Finally, W missed the deadline for filing a proof of claim against the bk
estate (H filed bk in May 2009). Is there a way she can obtain relief from
default, etc.? I believe the issue pertaining to the refi is being
addressed in the divorce case. Should she just file a motion for relief
from stay?
Thank you.
____________________________________
Law Office of Matthew Gary Evans
Matthew Gary Evans, Esq.
16 North Marengo Avenue, Room 219
Pasadena, California 91101
Tel.: (626) 405-9448
Fax: (626) 768-7565
Cell: (213) 842-6645
Email: matthew@matthewgaryevanslaw.com
www.matthewgaryevanslaw.com
www.matthewgaryevanslaw.net/Bankruptcy
please visit my blog at matthewevanslaw.wordpress.com
Member: California State Bar, American Bar Association, Consumer Attorneys
Association of Los Angeles, Central District Consumer Bankruptcy Attorneys
Association, National Association of Consumer Bankruptcy Attorneys, Pasadena
Chamber of Commerce
NOTICE: This message is intended only for the individual named. If you are
not the named addressee please do not disseminate, print, or copy this
e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail if you have
received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system.
Thank you.
Central
District of CA:

H
and W were married. H filed for divorce and then filed bk. W now
has $80k in attorneys fees in the divorce case, and an OSC re awarding W
attorneys fees is pending, but has been stayed by the bk. My first

The post was migrated from Yahoo.
Post Reply