.jpg)
Request for Permission to Use Streamlined Disclosure Statement
Daniela:
Call me.
Dennis McGoldrick
350 S. Crenshaw Bl., #A207B
Torrance, CA 90503
On Jan 15, 2010, at 2:31 PM, Giovanni Orantes wrote:
I've never requested this since I'm used to hundred or several-hundred-page long disclosure statements, but I doubt negative notice would work on this since some Judges (Ahart and Zurzolo, for example) have their own forms they like debtors to use. With that said, Judge Zurzolo did say at a meeting regarding Chapter 11s that he would entertain a motion to use basically the Central District Chapter 13 standard plan, though he didn't commit to granting it.
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 1:38 PM, Daniela Romero wrote:
Hi All,
Anyone ever request permission to use a streamlined disclosure statement? This is for the Hon. VPZ. Would this just be a "Request . . ." . . served on all and "Notice of Nonopp" after 15 days then file "Proposed Order?" Where in the rules would I look for guidance on this?
Also, would really appreciate if someone can give me a case name or no. of a ch. 11 case where you may have used a streamlined statement so that I can review the case.
[individual 11]
Thanks!
Smile and have a happy day--it could always be worse!
Daniela P. Romero
Law Office of Daniela Romero, APLC
1015 N. Lake Ave., Ste. 115
Pasadena, CA 91104
Telephone:626-817-2611
Facsimile: 626-628-1781
email: dromerolaw@gmail.com
NOTICE: This E-mail (including attachments) is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521. The information herein is confidential, privileged & exempt from disclosure under applicable law. This E-mail (including attachments) are intended solely for the use of the addressee hereof. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, you are prohibited from reading, disclosing, reproducing, distributing, disseminating, or otherwise using this transmission. The originator of this e-mail and its affiliates do not represent, warrant or guarantee that the integrity of this communication has been maintained or that this communication is free of errors, viruses or other defects. Delivery of this message or any portions herein to any person other than the intended recipient is not intended to waive any right or privilege. If you have received this message in error, please promptly notify the sender by e-mail and
immediately delete this message.
To comply with IRS regulations, we advise you that any discussion of Federal tax issues in this e-mail was not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used by you, (i) to avoid any penalties imposed under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) to promote, market or recommend to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein.
Giovanni Orantes, Esq.
3435 Wilshire Blvd. Suite 1980
Los Angeles, CA 90010
Tel: (213) 389-4362
Phone: (888) 619-8222 x101
Fax: (877) 789-5776
e-mail: go@gobklaw.com
website: www.gobklaw.com
WE ARE A "DEBT RELIEF AGENCY" AS DEFINED BY FEDERAL LAW.
SERVING BAKERSFIELD, LOS ANGELES, ORANGE COUNTY, RIVERSIDE, SAN BERNARDINO AND SANTA BARBARA.
Note: The information contained in this e-mail message is confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity named. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or an agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify us by telephone or e-mail and delete the original e-mail
IRS Circular 230 Disclosure: In order to comply with requirements imposed by the Internal Revenue Service, we inform you that any U.S. tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments) is not intended to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing, or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein.
Daniela: Call me.Dennis McGoldrick350 S. Crenshaw Bl., #A207BTorrance, CA 90503On Jan 15, 2010, at 2:31 PM, Giovanni Orantes <go@gobklaw.com> wrote:
I've never requested this since I'm used to hundred or several-hundred-page long disclosure statements, but I doubt negative notice would work on this since some Judges (Ahart and Zurzolo, for example) have their own forms they like debtors to use. With that said, Judge Zurzolo did say at a meeting regarding Chapter 11s that he would entertain a motion to use basically the Central District Chapter 13 standard plan, though he didn't commit to granting it.
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 1:38 PM, Daniela Romero <dromerolaw@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi All,Anyone ever request permission to use a streamlined disclosure statement? This is for the Hon. VPZ. Would this just be a "Request . . ." . . served on all and "Notice of Nonopp" after 15 days then file "Proposed Order?" Where in the rules would I look for guidance on this?
Also, would really appreciate if someone can give me a case name or no. of a ch. 11 case where you may have used a streamlined statement so that I can review the case.[individual 11]Thanks!Smile and have a happy day--it could always be worse!
ake Ave., Ste. 115Pasadena, CA 91104Telephone:626-817-2611Facsimile: 626-628-1781email: dromerolaw@gmail.com
NOTICE: This E-mail (including attachments) is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521. The information herein is confidential, privileged & exempt from disclosure under applicable law. This E-mail (including attachments) are intended solely for the use of the addressee hereof. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, you are prohibited from reading, disclosing, reproducing, distributing, disseminating, or otherwise using this transmission. The originator of this e-mail and its affiliates do not represent, warrant or guarantee that the integrity of this communication has been maintained or that this communication is free of errors, viruses or other defects. Delivery of this message or any portions herein to any person other than the intended recipient is not intended to waive any right or privilege. If you have received this message in error, please promptly
notify the sender by e-mail and immediately delete this message.
To comply with IRS regulations, we advise you that any discussion of Federal tax issues in this e-mail was not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used by you, (i) to avoid any penalties imposed under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) to promote, market or recommend to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein.
-- Giovanni Orantes, Esq. 3435 Wilshire Blvd. Suite 1980Los Angeles, CA 90010Tel: (213) 389-4362Phone: (888) 619-8222 x101Fax: (877) 789-5776e-mail: go@gobklaw.com
website: www.gobklaw.comWE ARE A "DEBT RELIEF AGENCY" AS DEFINED BY FEDERAL LAW.SERVING BAKERSFIELD, LOS ANGELES, ORANGE COUNTY, RIVERSIDE, SAN BERNARDINO AND SANTA BARBARA.
Note: The information contained in this e-mail message is confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity named. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or an agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify us by telephone or e-mail and delete the original e-mail IRS Circular 230 Disclosure: In order to comply with requirements imposed by the Internal Revenue Service, we inform you that any U.S. tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments) is not intended to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing, or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein.
The post was migrated from Yahoo.
Dennis McGoldrick
350 S. Crenshaw Bl., #A207B
Torrance, CA 90503
On Jan 15, 2010, at 2:31 PM, Giovanni Orantes wrote:
I've never requested this since I'm used to hundred or several-hundred-page long disclosure statements, but I doubt negative notice would work on this since some Judges (Ahart and Zurzolo, for example) have their own forms they like debtors to use. With that said, Judge Zurzolo did say at a meeting regarding Chapter 11s that he would entertain a motion to use basically the Central District Chapter 13 standard plan, though he didn't commit to granting it.
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 1:38 PM, Daniela Romero wrote:
Hi All,
Anyone ever request permission to use a streamlined disclosure statement? This is for the Hon. VPZ. Would this just be a "Request . . ." . . served on all and "Notice of Nonopp" after 15 days then file "Proposed Order?" Where in the rules would I look for guidance on this?
Also, would really appreciate if someone can give me a case name or no. of a ch. 11 case where you may have used a streamlined statement so that I can review the case.
[individual 11]
Thanks!
Smile and have a happy day--it could always be worse!
Daniela P. Romero
Law Office of Daniela Romero, APLC
1015 N. Lake Ave., Ste. 115
Pasadena, CA 91104
Telephone:626-817-2611
Facsimile: 626-628-1781
email: dromerolaw@gmail.com
NOTICE: This E-mail (including attachments) is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521. The information herein is confidential, privileged & exempt from disclosure under applicable law. This E-mail (including attachments) are intended solely for the use of the addressee hereof. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, you are prohibited from reading, disclosing, reproducing, distributing, disseminating, or otherwise using this transmission. The originator of this e-mail and its affiliates do not represent, warrant or guarantee that the integrity of this communication has been maintained or that this communication is free of errors, viruses or other defects. Delivery of this message or any portions herein to any person other than the intended recipient is not intended to waive any right or privilege. If you have received this message in error, please promptly notify the sender by e-mail and
immediately delete this message.
To comply with IRS regulations, we advise you that any discussion of Federal tax issues in this e-mail was not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used by you, (i) to avoid any penalties imposed under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) to promote, market or recommend to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein.
Giovanni Orantes, Esq.
3435 Wilshire Blvd. Suite 1980
Los Angeles, CA 90010
Tel: (213) 389-4362
Phone: (888) 619-8222 x101
Fax: (877) 789-5776
e-mail: go@gobklaw.com
website: www.gobklaw.com
WE ARE A "DEBT RELIEF AGENCY" AS DEFINED BY FEDERAL LAW.
SERVING BAKERSFIELD, LOS ANGELES, ORANGE COUNTY, RIVERSIDE, SAN BERNARDINO AND SANTA BARBARA.
Note: The information contained in this e-mail message is confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity named. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or an agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify us by telephone or e-mail and delete the original e-mail
IRS Circular 230 Disclosure: In order to comply with requirements imposed by the Internal Revenue Service, we inform you that any U.S. tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments) is not intended to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing, or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein.
Dennis McGoldrick350 S. Crenshaw Bl., #A207BTorrance, CA 90503On Jan 15, 2010, at 2:31 PM, Giovanni Orantes <go@gobklaw.com> wrote:
The post was migrated from Yahoo.