.jpg)
stipulation of lien strip complaint
No. File a motion to approve a valuation stipulation.
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 13, 2011, at 10:37 PM, Kirk Brennan wrote:
> Several people have said the complaint must be filed, otherwise there is nothing to stipulate to.
> Do you not agree?
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 10:28 AM, Dennis wrote:
>
> No
>
> Stip:
>
> Background Facts:
>
> Debtor owns x
> Creditor owed y, with z lien.
> The debtor wishes to value the property subject to the lien for all purposes in the Bk as $. .
> Creditor does not oppose valuation.
>
> Now Therefore debtor and creditor stipulate:
>
> Value of property for all purposes in this Bk case is $
>
> Signature
>
> Signature.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Dec 4, 2011, at 11:51 PM, Kirk Brennan wrote:
>
>>
>> Attached is the model order for Judge Zurzolo.
>>
>> I'm wondering if a pre-trial stipulation can be lodged when no complaint has yet been filed.
>>
>> Any of you ever tried to do this?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 1:21 PM, Dennis McGoldrick wrote:
>>
>> take out the language referring to the complaint.
>>
>> To: Cdcbaa Yahoo Listserv
>> Sent: Sunday, November 27, 2011 12:31 PM
>>
>> Subject: [cdcbaa] stipulation of lien strip complaint
>>
>>
>> Haven't yet filed a lien strip complaint to remove the 2nd DOT, and the 2nd DOT lender has reached out stating a willingness to stipulate.
>>
>> The only stipulated model order I see addresses complaints that have already been filed. Any suggestions?
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Kirk Brennan, esq.
>> California Law Office, P.C.
>> calibankrutpcysite.com
>>
>> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments are for the exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or take action in reliance on this message. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail and promptly delete this message and its attachments from your computer system. We do not waive attorney-client or work product privilege by the transmission of this message.
>> TAX ADVICE NOTICE: Tax advice, if any, contained in this e-mail does not constitute a "reliance opinion" as defined in IRS Circular 230 and may not be used to establish reasonable reliance on the opinion of counsel for the purpose of avoiding the penalty imposed by Section 6662A of the Internal Revenue Code. The firm provides reliance opinions only in formal opinion letters containing the signature of a director.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Kirk Brennan, esq.
>> California Law Office, P.C.
>> calibankrutpcysite.com
>>
>> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments are for the exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or take action in reliance on this message. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail and promptly delete this message and its attachments from your computer system. We do not waive attorney-client or work product privilege by the transmission of this message.
>> TAX ADVICE NOTICE: Tax advice, if any, contained in this e-mail does not constitute a "reliance opinion" as defined in IRS Circular 230 and may not be used to establish reasonable reliance on the opinion of counsel for the purpose of avoiding the penalty imposed by Section 6662A of the Internal Revenue Code. The firm provides reliance opinions only in formal opinion letters containing the signature of a director.
>>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Kirk Brennan, esq.
> California Law Office, P.C.
> calibankrutpcysite.com
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments are for the exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or take action in reliance on this message. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail and promptly delete this message and its attachments from your computer system. We do not waive attorney-client or work product privilege by the transmission of this message.
> TAX ADVICE NOTICE: Tax advice, if any, contained in this e-mail does not constitute a "reliance opinion" as defined in IRS Circular 230 and may not be used to establish reasonable reliance on the opinion of counsel for the purpose of avoiding the penalty imposed by Section 6662A of the Internal Revenue Code. The firm provides reliance opinions only in formal opinion letters containing the signature of a director.
>
>
No. File a motion to approve a valuation stipulation. Sent from my iPhoneOn Dec 13, 2011, at 10:37 PM, Kirk Brennan <kirkinhermosa@gmail.com> wrote:
Several people have said the complaint must be filed, otherwise there is nothing to stipulate to. Do you not agree?On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 10:28 AM, Dennis
The post was migrated from Yahoo.
Several people have said the complaint must be filed, otherwise there is
nothing to stipulate to.
Do you not agree?
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 10:28 AM, Dennis wrote:
> **
>
>
> No
>
> Stip:
>
> Background Facts:
>
> Debtor owns x
> Creditor owed y, with z lien.
> The debtor wishes to value the property subject to the lien for all
> purposes in the Bk as $. .
> Creditor does not oppose valuation.
>
> Now Therefore debtor and creditor stipulate:
>
> Value of property for all purposes in this Bk case is $
>
> Signature
>
> Signature.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Dec 4, 2011, at 11:51 PM, Kirk Brennan wrote:
>
>
>
> Attached is the model order for Judge Zurzolo.
>
> I'm wondering if a pre-trial stipulation can be lodged when no complaint
> has yet been filed.
>
> Any of you ever tried to do this?
>
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 1:21 PM, Dennis McGoldrick easky1@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> **
>>
>>
>> take out the language referring to the complaint.
>>
>> ------------------------------
>> *From:* Kirk Brennan
>> *To:* Cdcbaa Yahoo Listserv > cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com>
>> *Sent:* Sunday, November 27, 2011 12:31 PM
>>
>> *Subject:* [cdcbaa] stipulation of lien strip complaint
>>
>> **
>>
>>
>> Haven't yet filed a lien strip complaint to remove the 2nd DOT, and the
>> 2nd DOT lender has reached out stating a willingness to stipulate.
>> The only stipulated model order I see addresses complaints that have
>> already been filed. Any suggestions?
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Kirk Brennan, esq.
>> California Law Office, P.C.
>> calibankrutpcysite.com
>>
>> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments are for the
>> exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are not
>> the intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or take action in
>> reliance on this message. If you have received this message in error,
>> please notify us immediately by return e-mail and promptly delete this
>> message and its attachments from your computer system. We do not waive
>> attorney-client or work product privilege by the transmission of this
>> message.
>> TAX ADVICE NOTICE: Tax advice, if any, contained in this e-mail does not
>> constitute a "reliance opinion" as defined in IRS Circular 230 and may not
>> be used to establish reasonable reliance on the opinion of counsel for the
>> purpose of avoiding the penalty imposed by Section 6662A of the Internal
>> Revenue Code. The firm provides reliance opinions only in formal opinion
>> letters containing the signature of a director.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Kirk Brennan, esq.
> California Law Office, P.C.
> calibankrutpcysite.com
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments are for the
> exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are not
> the intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or take action in
> reliance on this message. If you have received this message in error,
> please notify us immediately by return e-mail and promptly delete this
> message and its attachments from your computer system. We do not waive
> attorney-client or work product privilege by the transmission of this
> message.
> TAX ADVICE NOTICE: Tax advice, if any, contained in this e-mail does not
> constitute a "reliance opinion" as defined in IRS Circular 230 and may not
> be used to establish reasonable reliance on the opinion of counsel for the
> purpose of avoiding the penalty imposed by Section 6662A of the Internal
> Revenue Code. The firm provides reliance opinions only in formal opinion
> letters containing the signature of a director.
>
>
>
Kirk Brennan, esq.
California Law Office, P.C.
calibankrutpcysite.com
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments are for the
exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are not
the intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or take action in
reliance on this message. If you have received this message in error,
please notify us immediately by return e-mail and promptly delete this
message and its attachments from your computer system. We do not waive
attorney-client or work product privilege by the transmission of this
message.
TAX ADVICE NOTICE: Tax advice, if any, contained in this e-mail does not
constitute a "reliance opinion" as defined in IRS Circular 230 and may not
be used to establish reasonable reliance on the opinion of counsel for the
purpose of avoiding the penalty imposed by Section 6662A of the Internal
Revenue Code. The firm provides reliance opinions only in formal opinion
letters containing the signature of a director.
Several people have said the complaint must be filed, otherwise there is nothing to stipulate to. Do you not agree?On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 10:28 AM, Dennis <easky1@yahoo.com> wrote:
The post was migrated from Yahoo.
Attached is the model order for Judge Zurzolo.
I'm wondering if a pre-trial stipulation can be lodged when no complaint
has yet been filed.
Any of you ever tried to do this?
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 1:21 PM, Dennis McGoldrick wrote:
> **
>
>
> take out the language referring to the complaint.
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Kirk Brennan
> *To:* Cdcbaa Yahoo Listserv
> *Sent:* Sunday, November 27, 2011 12:31 PM
>
> *Subject:* [cdcbaa] stipulation of lien strip complaint
>
> **
>
>
> Haven't yet filed a lien strip complaint to remove the 2nd DOT, and the
> 2nd DOT lender has reached out stating a willingness to stipulate.
> The only stipulated model order I see addresses complaints that have
> already been filed. Any suggestions?
>
>
>
> --
> Kirk Brennan, esq.
> California Law Office, P.C.
> calibankrutpcysite.com
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments are for the
> exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are not
> the intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or take action in
> reliance on this message. If you have received this message in error,
> please notify us immediately by return e-mail and promptly delete this
> message and its attachments from your computer system. We do not waive
> attorney-client or work product privilege by the transmission of this
> message.
> TAX ADVICE NOTICE: Tax advice, if any, contained in this e-mail does not
> constitute a "reliance opinion" as defined in IRS Circular 230 and may not
> be used to establish reasonable reliance on the opinion of counsel for the
> purpose of avoiding the penalty imposed by Section 6662A of the Internal
> Revenue Code. The firm provides reliance opinions only in formal opinion
> letters containing the signature of a director.
>
>
>
>
>
Kirk Brennan, esq.
California Law Office, P.C.
calibankrutpcysite.com
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments are for the
exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are not
the intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or take action in
reliance on this message. If you have received this message in error,
please notify us immediately by return e-mail and promptly delete this
message and its attachments from your computer system. We do not waive
attorney-client or work product privilege by the transmission of this
message.
TAX ADVICE NOTICE: Tax advice, if any, contained in this e-mail does not
constitute a "reliance opinion" as defined in IRS Circular 230 and may not
be used to establish reasonable reliance on the opinion of counsel for the
purpose of avoiding the penalty imposed by Section 6662A of the Internal
Revenue Code. The firm provides reliance opinions only in formal opinion
letters containing the signature of a director.
Attached is the model order for Judge Zurzolo.I'm wondering if a pre-trial stipulation can be lodged when no complaint has yet been filed.gmail_quote">
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 1:21 PM, Dennis McGoldrick <easky1@yahoo.com> wrote:
take out the language referring to the complaint.
From: Kirk Brennan <kirkinhermosa@gmail.com>
To: Cdcbaa Yahoo Listserv <cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Sunday, November 27, 2011 12:31 PM
Subject: [cdcbaa] stipulation of lien strip complaint
Haven't yet filed a lien strip complaint to remove the 2nd DOT, and the 2nd DOT lender has reached out stating a willingness to stipulate. The only stipulated model order I see addresses complaints that have already been filed. Any suggestions?
-- Kirk Brennan, esq.California Law Office, P.C.calibankrutpcysite.comCONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments are for the exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or take action in reliance on this message. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail and promptly delete this message and its attachments from your computer system. We do not waive attorney-client or work product privilege by the transmission of this message.
TAX ADVICE NOTICE: Tax advice, if any, contained in this e-mail does not constitute a "reliance opinion" as defined in IRS Circular 230 and may not be used to establish reasonable reliance on the opinion of counsel for the purpose of avoiding the penalty imposed by Section 6662A of the Internal Revenue Code. The firm provides reliance opinions only in formal opinion letters containing the signature of a director.
-- Kirk Brennan, esq.California Law Office, P.C.calibankrutpcysite.comCONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments are for the exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or take action in reliance on this message. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail and promptly delete this message and its attachments from your computer system. We do not waive attorney-client or work product privilege by the transmission of this message.
TAX ADVICE NOTICE: Tax advice, if any, contained in this e-mail does not constitute a "reliance opinion" as defined in IRS Circular 230 and may not be used to establish reasonable reliance on the opinion of counsel for the purpose of avoiding the penalty imposed by Section 6662A of the Internal Revenue Code. The firm provides reliance opinions only in formal opinion letters containing the signature of a director.
X-Attachment-Id: f_gvt6kemh0
X-Attachment-Id: f_gvt6kemh0
The post was migrated from Yahoo.
take out the language referring to the complaint.
________________________________
To: Cdcbaa Yahoo Listserv
Sent: Sunday, November 27, 2011 12:31 PM
Subject: [cdcbaa] stipulation of lien strip complaint
Haven't yet filed a lien strip complaint to remove the 2nd DOT, and the 2nd DOT lender has reached out stating a willingness to stipulate.
The only stipulated model order I see addresses complaints that have already been filed. Any suggestions?
Kirk Brennan, esq.
California Law Office, P.C.
calibankrutpcysite.com
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments are for the exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or take action in reliance on this message. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail and promptly delete this message and its attachments from your computer system. We do not waive attorney-client or work product privilege by the transmission of this message.
TAX ADVICE NOTICE: Tax advice, if any, contained in this e-mail does not constitute a "reliance opinion" as defined in IRS Circular 230 and may not be used to establish reasonable reliance on the opinion of counsel for the purpose of avoiding the penalty imposed by Section 6662A of the Internal Revenue Code. The firm provides reliance opinions only in formal opinion letters containing the signature of a director.
take out the language referring to the complaint.
The post was migrated from Yahoo.
Haven't yet filed a lien strip complaint to remove the 2nd DOT, and the 2nd
DOT lender has reached out stating a willingness to stipulate.
The only stipulated model order I see addresses complaints that have
already been filed. Any suggestions?
Kirk Brennan, esq.
California Law Office, P.C.
calibankrutpcysite.com
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments are for the
exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are not
the intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or take action in
reliance on this message. If you have received this message in error,
please notify us immediately by return e-mail and promptly delete this
message and its attachments from your computer system. We do not waive
attorney-client or work product privilege by the transmission of this
message.
TAX ADVICE NOTICE: Tax advice, if any, contained in this e-mail does not
constitute a "reliance opinion" as defined in IRS Circular 230 and may not
be used to establish reasonable reliance on the opinion of counsel for the
purpose of avoiding the penalty imposed by Section 6662A of the Internal
Revenue Code. The firm provides reliance opinions only in formal opinion
letters containing the signature of a director.
Haven't yet filed a lien strip complaint to remove the 2nd DOT, and the 2nd DOT lender has reached out stating a willingness to stipulate. The only stipulated model order I see addresses complaints that have already been filed. Any suggestions?
-- Kirk Brennan, esq.California Law Office, P.C.calibankrutpcysite.comCONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments are for the exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or take action in reliance on this message. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail and promptly delete this message and its attachments from your computer system. We do not waive attorney-client or work product privilege by the transmission of this message.
TAX ADVICE NOTICE: Tax advice, if any, contained in this e-mail does not constitute a "reliance opinion" as defined in IRS Circular 230 and may not be used to establish reasonable reliance on the opinion of counsel for the purpose of avoiding the penalty imposed by Section 6662A of the Internal Revenue Code. The firm provides reliance opinions only in formal opinion letters containing the signature of a director.
The post was migrated from Yahoo.