.jpg)
Validity of Ch. 13 LAM order on conversion to Chapter=
I do a motion to value. Then if it is a rental property the value is
established. If it is a residence the value is established as to the 2nd.
Law Office of Catherine Christiansen
________________________________
To: cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Fri, April 29, 2011 1:14:47 PM
Subject: Re: [cdcbaa] Validity of Ch. 13 LAM order on conversion to Chapter 11
RN granted by motion for my ch11 clients 10-29429.
Peter M. Lively, JD, MBA
The Personal Financial Law Center * Culver City & Costa Mesa * 800-307-DEBT
________________________________
To: cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Fri, April 29, 2011 12:13:17 PM
Subject: Re: [cdcbaa] Validity of Ch. 13 LAM order on conversion to Chapter 11
Mark: I haven't seen or thought of a LAM motion in a Chapter 11, but thatdoesn't mean it isn't out there or possible. Hopefully the others can share
their experiences on this.
Jason
On Apr 29, 2011, at 10:13 AM, Mark J. Markus wrote:
>I agree I would need a new order (or modification of the prior order). But are
>you saying one cannot do a "Lam Motion" in a Chapter 11? In other words, you
>just do a 506 motion and then you have to do a separate adversary regardless?
>Or is there some other method? This would be a Valley case, just FYI.
>
>
>*************************
>Mark J. Markus
>Law Office of Mark J. Markus
>11684 Ventura Blvd. PMB #403
>Studio City, CA 91604-2652
>(818)509-1173 (818)509-1460 (fax)
>web: http://www.bklaw.com/
>This Firm is a Qualified Federal Debt Relief Agency (see what this means at
The post was migrated from Yahoo.
RN granted by motion for my ch11clients 10-29429.
Peter M. Lively, JD, MBA
The Personal Financial Law Center* Culver City & Costa Mesa * 800-307-DEBT
________________________________
To: cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Fri, April 29, 2011 12:13:17 PM
Subject: Re: [cdcbaa] Validity of Ch. 13 LAM order on conversion to Chapter 11
Mark: I haven't seen or thought of a LAM motion in a Chapter 11, but that
doesn't mean it isn't out there or possible. Hopefully the others can share
their experiences on this.
Jason
On Apr 29, 2011, at 10:13 AM, Mark J. Markus wrote:
>I agree I would need a new order (or modification of the prior order).>you saying one cannot do a "Lam Motion" in a Chapter 11? In other words, you
>just do a 506 motion and then you have to do a separate adversary regardless?
>Or is there some other method? This would be a Valley case, just FYI.
>
>
>*************************
>Mark J. Markus
>Law Office of Mark J. Markus
>11684 Ventura Blvd. PMB #403
>Studio City, CA 91604-2652
>(818)509-1173 (818)509-1460 (fax)
>web: http://www.bklaw.com/
>This Firm is a Qualified Federal Debt Relief Agency (see what this means at
The post was migrated from Yahoo.