Means Test Interpretation

Post Reply
Yahoo Bot
Posts: 22904
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2020 11:38 pm


They have to file a motion to dismiss.
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 12:52 PM, Sina Maghsoudi wrote:
>
>
>
> If the US Trustee disputes your means test and thinks that there is a
> presumption of abuse, does the US Trustee need to file a motion to dismiss,
> with 21 days notice, or can they dismiss the case without a court
> hearing. For example, debtors that miss two 341 meetings have their cases
> dismissed without a hearing.
>
>
> TIA
> Sina
>
>
>
>
> --- On *Mon, 5/9/11, Mark T. Jessee * wrote:
>
>
> Subject: Re: [cdcbaa] Did means test change significantly for high earners
> from 3/2011 to 5/2011?
> To: cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com
> Date: Monday, May 9, 2011, 5:25 PM
>
> Numbers changed March 15, 2011.
>
>
> Mark T. Jessee
> Law Offices of Mark T. Jessee
> "A Debt Relief Agency"
> 50 W. Hillcrest Drive, Suite 200
> Thousand Oaks, CA 91360
> (805) 497-5868 (805) 497-5864 (Facsimile)
>
>
> On Mon, 9 May 2011 17:20:19 -0700, Alik Segal wrote:
>
>
> Listmates,
>
> I have a client who is a high earner. I did his means test (including
> deductions) in March 2011 and he was passing. Then I ran the means test
> again in May, and he was failing. Did the means test significantly change?
> If not, then does anyone have any ideas about what might be happening?
>
> --
> Alik Segal
> Alik.Segal@gmail.com
> 310-362-6157
> Cal. CD, Los Angeles
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Kirk Brennan, esq.
California Law Office, P.C.
calibankrutpcysite.com
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments are for the
exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are not the
intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or take action in
reliance on this message. If you have received this message in error, please
notify us immediately by return e-mail and promptly delete this message and
its attachments from your computer system. We do not waive attorney-client
or work product privilege by the transmission of this message.
TAX ADVICE NOTICE: Tax advice, if any, contained in this e-mail does not
constitute a "reliance opinion" as defined in IRS Circular 230 and may not
be used to establish reasonable reliance on the opinion of counsel for the
purpose of avoiding the penalty imposed by Section 6662A of the Internal
Revenue Code. The firm provides reliance opinions only in formal opinion
letters containing the signature of a director.
They have to file a motion to dismiss.On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 12:52 PM, Sina Maghsoudi <sinamagh@yahoo.com> wrote:
If the US Trustee, does the US Trustee need to file a motion to dismiss, with 21 days notice, or can they dismiss the case without a court hearing.For example, debtors that miss two 341 meetings have their cases dismissed without a hearing.
TIA
Sina
--- On Mon, 5/9/11, Mark T. Jessee <mjessee@jesseelaw.com> wrote:
. Jessee <mjessee@jesseelaw.com>Subject: Re: [cdcbaa] Did means test change significantly for high earners from 3/2011 to 5/2011?
To: cdcbaa@yahoogroups.comDate: Monday, May 9, 2011, 5:25 PM
Numbers changed March 15, 2011.
Mark T. JesseeLaw Offices of Mark T. Jessee"A Debt Relief Agency"50 W. Hillcrest Drive, Suite 200Thousand Oaks, CA 91360(805) 497-5868 (805) 497-5864 (Facsimile)
On Mon, 9 May 2011 17:20:19 -0700, Alik Segal wrote:
Listmates,
I have a client who is a high earner. I did his means test (including deductions) in March 2011 and he was passing. Then I ran the means test again in May, and he was failing. Did the means test significantly change? If not, then does anyone have any ideas about what might be happening?
-- Alik Segal
The post was migrated from Yahoo.
Yahoo Bot
Posts: 22904
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2020 11:38 pm


If the US Trusteedisputes your means test and thinks that there is a presumption of abuse, does the US Trustee need to file a motion to dismiss, with 21 days notice, or can they dismiss the case without a court hearing.ed without a hearing.
TIA
Sina

The post was migrated from Yahoo.
Post Reply