.jpg)
Request for Admission
So they don't go get a higher appraisL
Dennis McGoldrick
350 S. Crenshaw Bl., #A207B
Torrance, CA 90503
On Feb 22, 2010, at 5:30 PM, robert90701@aol.com wrote:
So why file a RFA to an admission? It's already in.
Good Luck starts with a strategy and a plan. Form a strategic alliance with
Robert J. Suhajda, MS,CPA
17721 Norwalk Blvd. #43
Artesia, CA 90701
562-924-8922
Income Tax for Attorneys, Bankruptcy, IRS representation,
Fiduciary income tax returns, Estate and Gift tax returns,
Trust Protector, Independent Trustee, Court Accountings
In a message dated 2/17/2010 5:52:41 P.M. Pacific Standard Time, j.d.faucher@sbcglobal.net writes:
And if the creditor filed an answer, I dont see a reason to prove proper service or even ask about it. You can get this done with fewer than three requests, just as you think. Sometimes, in litigation, less is more.
- John Faucher
On 2/17/10 4:53 PM, "Steven B. Lever" wrote:
Thats pretty funny, Nancy. There are only two things to prove, the value of the property and proper service, so Id just go with that on the Requests for Admission.
The post was migrated from Yahoo.
So why file a RFA to an admission? It's already in.
Good Luck starts with a strategy and a plan. Form a strategic alliance
with
Robert J. Suhajda, MS,CPA
17721 Norwalk Blvd. #43
Artesia, CA 90701
562-924-8922
Income Tax for Attorneys, Bankruptcy, IRS representation,
Fiduciary income tax returns, Estate and Gift tax returns,
Trust Protector, Independent Trustee, Court Accountings
In a message dated 2/17/2010 5:52:41 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
j.d.faucher@sbcglobal.net writes:
And if the creditor filed an answer, I dont see a reason to prove proper
service or even ask about it. You can get this done with fewer than threerequests, just as you think. Sometimes, in litigation, less is more.
- John Faucher
On 2/17/10 4:53 PM, "Steven B. Lever" wrote:
Thats pretty funny, Nancy. There are only two things to prove, the value
of the property and proper service, so Id just go with that on the
Requests for Admission.
The post was migrated from Yahoo.
charset="ISO-8859-1"
And if the creditor filed an answer, I dont see a reason to prove proper
service or even ask about it. You can get this done with fewer than three
requests, just as you think. Sometimes, in litigation, less is more.
- John Faucher
On 2/17/10 4:53 PM, "Steven B. Lever" wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> Thats pretty funny, Nancy. There are only two things to prove, the value of
> the property and proper service, so Id just go with that on the Requests for
> Admission.
>
>
> nancybonaccorso
> Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 3:58 PM
> To: cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [cdcbaa] Request for Admission
>
>
>
> I have an AP with Judge E. Carroll in which the creditor filed an answer. I
> asked the to provide me proof of their valuation of the property and they sent
> be a BPO which is approximately $100,000 lower than the amount owed on the
> first mortgage and is dated approximately 5 days prior to filing the chapter
> 13. I don't understand why they filed an answer when the only evidence as to
> value they have provide proves my case.
>
> Do I file a Request for Admission and attach the BPO and wait for a response?
> How extensive should my Request be? I have seen some that are very long and
> request admission that the defendant was noticed and served properly?
>
> Thanks,
> Nancy B. Clark
> Borowitz & Clark
charset="ISO-8859-1"
Re: [cdcbaa] Request for Admission
And if the creditor filed an answer, I don’t see a reason to prove proper service or even ask about it. You can get this done with fewer than three requests, just as you think. Sometimes, in litigation, less is more.
- John Faucher
On 2/17/10 4:53 PM, "Steven B. Lever" <sblever@leverlaw.com> wrote:
That’s pretty funny, Nancy. There are only two things to prove, the value of the property and proper service, so I’d just go with that on the Requests for Admission.
From:
The post was migrated from Yahoo.
I have an AP with Judge E. Carroll in which the creditor filed an answer. I asked the to provide me proof of their valuation of the property and they sent be a BPO which is approximately $100,000 lower than the amount owed on the first mortgage and is dated approximately 5 days prior to filing the chapter 13. I don't understand why they filed an answer when the only evidence as to value they have provide proves my case.
Do I file a Request for Admission and attach the BPO and wait for a response? How extensive should my Request be? I have seen some that are very long and request admission that the defendant was noticed and served properly?
Thanks,
Nancy B. Clark
Borowitz & Clark
100 N. Barranca Avenue, Suite 250
West Covina, CA 91791-1600
Office: (626) 332-8600
Fax: (626) 332-8644
Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply email. Please advise immediately if you or your employer does not consent to Internet email for messages of this kind. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message that do not relate to the official business of my firm shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it.
IRS Circular 230 Disclosure: To ensure compliance with Treasury Department Regulations, we advise you that, unless otherwise expressly indicated, any federal tax advice contained in this communication was not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding tax-related penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or applicable state or local tax law provisions or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any tax-related matter addressed herein.
The post was migrated from Yahoo.