.jpg)
In re Frederickson, 375 BR 829 (BAP 8th Cir 2007); B22C DI x 60 is PDI, ACP is NOT duration
Peter,
Remind me which question I was asking about regarding this case.
Nate
P L wrote:
The 8th Circuit BAP in Frederickson went the opposite way than the 9th Circuit BAP in Pak.
Frederickson sides with Garvia, Pak sides with Dockery re Garvia v Dockery...
Nate, this is the case you were looking for...
Peter
Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.
Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your homepage.
Peter,Remind me which question I was asking about regarding this case.NateP L <petermlively2000@yahoo.com> wrote: The 8th Circuit BAP in Frederickson went the opposite way than the 9th Circuit BAP in Pak. Frederickson sides with Garvia, Pak sides with Dockery re Garvia v Dockery... Nate, this is the case you were looking for... Peter Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.
Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your homepage.
The post was migrated from Yahoo.
The 8th Circuit BAP in Frederickson went the opposite way than the 9th Circuit BAP in Pak.
Frederickson sides with Garvia, Pak sides with Dockery re Garvia v Dockery...
Nate, this is the case you were looking for...
Peter
Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.
The 8th Circuit BAP in Frederickson went the opposite way than the 9th Circuit BAP in Pak. Frederickson sides with Garvia, Pak sides with Dockery re Garvia v Dockery... Nate, this is the case you were looking for... Peter
Looking for last minute shopping deals?
Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.
The post was migrated from Yahoo.