BK Billing, LLC and alleged Improper Ch7 Bk practices

Post Reply
Yahoo Bot
Posts: 22904
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2020 11:38 pm


The complaint is a good read. But I also find it interesting to note that the bkbillings.com website says they are a platinum sponsor of NACBA. It gives them a ring of authority.
Desiree Causey, Esq.
Law Office of Desiree Causey
7755 Center Avenue, Suite 1100
Huntington Beach, CA 92647
714-372-2225 (phone)
714-908-7646 (same fax number)
Privileged And Confidential Communication.
This electronic transmission, and any documents attached hereto, (a) are protected by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act (18 USC 2510-2521), (b) may contain confidential and/or legally privileged information, and (c) are for the sole use of the intended recipient named above. If you have received this electronic message in error, please notify the sender and delete the electronic message. Any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of the information received in error is strictly prohibited.
Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.

The post was migrated from Yahoo.
Yahoo Bot
Posts: 22904
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2020 11:38 pm


Thanks for sharing this with everyone! I appreciate it.
On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 5:26 AM, Keith Higginbotham cdcbaacheck@aol.com
[cdcbaa] wrote:
>
>
> Dear Colleagues!
>
> I came across an interesting UST adversary complaint filed yesterday
> that alleges improper Ch7 business practices as it relates to "bifurcating
> Ch7 atty fees between prepetition and post petition" and then "assigning
> the debt to a collection agency called BK Billing, Inc., to service the
> debt".
>
> The complaint *alleges* violations of 9th Circuit law as it relates to
> a novel Ch7 fee arrangement. *My intent is to alert you to a company
> called BK Billing, LLC.*
>
> Check out: 6:17-ap-01271-MJ Docket #1
>
>
> *Keith A. Higginbotham*
>
> *HIGGINBOTHAM LAW GROUP*
> *255 S. Grand Avenue, Suite #2109
>
The post was migrated from Yahoo.
Yahoo Bot
Posts: 22904
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2020 11:38 pm


Dear Colleagues!
I came across an interesting UST adversary complaint filed yesterday that alleges improper Ch7 business practices as it relates to "bifurcating Ch7 atty fees between prepetition and post petition" and then "assigning the debt to a collection agency called BK Billing, Inc., to service the debt".
The complaint alleges violations of 9th Circuit law as it relates to a novel Ch7 fee arrangement. My intent is to alert you to a company called BK Billing, LLC.

Check out: 6:17-ap-01271-MJ Docket #1
Keith A. Higginbotham

HIGGINBOTHAM LAW GROUP
255 S. Grand Avenue, Suite #2109
Los Angeles, CA 90012-3045
Phone: 213.620.0176
***NEW CONCURRENT EMAIL ADDRESS:***
HigginbothamLaw@gmail.com
Dear Colleagues!
I came across an interesting UST adversary complaint filed yesterday that alleges improper Ch7 business practices as it relates to "bifurcating Ch7 atty fees between prepetition and post petition" and then "assigning the debt to a collection agency called BK Billing, Inc., to service the debt".
The complaint alleges violations of 9th Circuit law as it relates to a novel Ch7 fee arrangement. My intent is to alert you to a company called BK Billing, LLC.

Check out: 6:17-ap-01271-MJ Docket #1
Keith A. Higginbotham

HIGGINBOTHAM LAW GROUP
255 S. Grand Avenue, Suite #2109
Los Angeles, CA 90012-3045
Phone: 213.620.0176

***NEW CONCURRENT EMAIL ADDRESS:***
HigginbothamLaw@gmail.com

The post was migrated from Yahoo.
Post Reply