.jpg)
VZ Practices
How does VZ treat 362(c)(3)(A)?
Does he:
1. Treat the expiration of the stay as against the debtor only, leaving the stay in place to protect property of the estate; or
2. Treat the expiration of the stay as against both the debtor AND property of the estate - leaving no protection in place?
The other language which always confuses is the part about Ch 7. In my situation Ch7 was dismissed for failure to appear at 341a. New case is a Ch 13. Does (c)(3)(A) apply?
David A. Tilem
Certified Bankruptcy Specialist Since 1997
Law Offices of David A. Tilem
206 N. Jackson St., #201
Glendale, CA 91206
Tel: 818-507-6000 * Fax: 818-507-6800
Toll Free: 888-BK PRO 4U (888-257-7648)
www.TilemLaw.com
[square-facebook-24] [square-twitter-24] [square-linkedin-24] [square-google-plus-24]
[cid:image005.png@01D0C939.A54B78D0] [cid:image006.png@01D0C939.A54B78D0] [SL] [AVVO] [av]
The pages comprising this transmission may contain CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION from Law Offices of David A. Tilem. This information is intended solely for use by the individual or entity named as the recipient hereof. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this transmission is prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please notify us by telephone immediately so we may arrange and correct this transmission.
The post was migrated from Yahoo.