.jpg)
Dischargeability of Judgment for Cable TV Piracy
Judge Bufford rendered a decision in 2006 *In re Sandoval * which you might
find interesting.
But I don't know if there was a state court action in that case that went
to judgment.
See attached:
Renay
R. Grace Rodriguez, Esq.
OFF: (818) 734-7223
CEL: (818) 554-9922
Judge Bufford rendered a decision in 2006 In re Sandoval which you might find interesting.But I don't know if there was a state court action in that case that went to judgment.
See attached:RenayCEL: (818) 554-9922
X-Attachment-Id: f_gz6erg060
X-Attachment-Id: f_gz6erg060
The post was migrated from Yahoo.
I think the operative word in the original message was "civil" as in
"civil judgment." Schedule F.
Gerald McNally
McNally Bus Card Smaller
Gerald McNally
McNally & Associates, P.C.
517 East Wilson Ave., Ste 104
Glendale, CA 91206
818.507.5100
Fax: 818.507.5001
Notice to Recipient: This email is meant for only the intended
recipient of the transmission and may be a communication privileged by
law. If you received this email in error, and review, use,
dissemination, distribution or copying of this email is strictly
prohibited. Please notify us immediately of the error by return email
and please delete this message and any and all duplicates of this
message from your system. Thank you in advance for your cooperation.
IRS Circular 230 Disclosure: In order to comply with the requirements
imposed by the Internal Revenue Service, we inform you that any U.S.
tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments)
is not intended to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i)
avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue code or (ii) promoting,
marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or matter
addressed herein.
The post was migrated from Yahoo.
I was working for Vincent Moneymaker when he represented Don King
Productions and they use to go after bar owners for same reason. I
remember him filing some non-dischargeability complaints. Maybe if you
search pacer? You could see the cases Jeff Smith is talking about.
But look what happened with that debtor and his student loans he had
discharged by a fluke and it was upheld. So couldn't you take same
approach, file, list it, and see if he gets a non-dischargeability
complaint and nego a settlement from there?
Sorry couldn't be more help.
Renay
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 12:38 PM, jbsesq1965 wrote:
> **
>
>
> Wasn't there a case about 12-15 years ago involving a bar owner that used
> an illegal feed of a boxing match, then charged customers to come see the
> fight, then filed BK when his cable provider sued?? I can't recall the name
> of the case, or the result for that matter, but I recall the facts and the
> case was significant in its holding at the time. Not much actual help I
> know, but the point is that I'd really do some digging because I know there
> is a case with similar facts floating around out there.
>
> Jeff Smith
>
>
I was working for Vincent Moneymaker when he represented Don King Productions and they use to go after bar owners for same reason. I remember him filing some non-dischargeability complaints. Maybe if you search pacer?But look what happened with that debtor and his student loans he had discharged by a fluke and it was upheld. So couldn't you take same approach, file, list it, and see if he gets a non-dischargeability complaint and nego a settlement from there?
Sorry couldn't be more help.RenayOn Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 12:38 PM, jbsesq1965 <jsmith@cgsattys.com> wrote:
Wasn't there a case about 12-15 years ago involving a bar owner that used an illegal feed of a boxing match, then charged customers to come see the fight, then filed BK when his cable provider sued?? I can't recall the name of the case, or the result for that matter, but I recall the facts and the case was significant in its holding at the time. Not much actual help I know, but the point is that I'd really do some digging because I know there is a case with similar facts floating around out there.
Jeff Smith
The post was migrated from Yahoo.
Wasn't there a case about 12-15 years ago involving a bar owner that used an illegal feed of a boxing match, then charged customers to come see the fight, then filed BK when his cable provider sued?? I can't recall the name of the case, or the result for that matter, but I recall the facts and the case was significant in its holding at the time. Not much actual help I know, but the point is that I'd really do some digging because I know there is a case with similar facts floating around out there.
Jeff Smith
>
> Likely no, if it results in criminal restitution.
>
> Jonathan Leventhal, Esq.
> Leventhal Law Group, P.C.
> 818-347-5800
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> To: "cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com"
> Sent: 02/26/2012 2:25 PM
> Subject: [cdcbaa] Dischargeability of Judgment for Cable TV Piracy
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Hello everyone:
>
> PC has a civil judgment against him for Cable TV Piracy (violation of CA Penal Code 593(d), Violation of US Code section 553 and 605. The plaintiff is Warner Cable. Is this debt dischargeable in ch 7?
>
> Thank you
> Sofya
>
The post was migrated from Yahoo.
I will third and say it must be listed anyway. You have to take the shot.
On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 3:42 PM, Leventhal Law Group, P.C. wrote:
> **
>
>
> **
>
> I second that
>
> Jonathan Leventhal, Esq.
> Leventhal Law Group, P.C.818-347-5800
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> To: "cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com" >
> Sent: 02/26/2012 3:35 PM
> Subject: RE: [cdcbaa] Dischargeability of Judgment for Cable TV Piracy
>
>
>
>
>
> Its worth a shot though. Creditor might not know better.
> On Feb 26, 2012 2:54 PM, "Leventhal Law Group, P.C." wrote:
>
>> **
>>
>>
>> **
>>
>> Likely no, if it results in criminal restitution.
>>
>> Jonathan Leventhal, Esq.
>> Leventhal Law Group, P.C.818-347-5800
>>
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> To: "cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com"
>> Sent: 02/26/2012 2:25 PM
>> Subject: [cdcbaa] Dischargeability of Judgment for Cable TV Piracy
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Hello everyone:
>>
>> PC has a civil judgment against him for Cable TV Piracy (violation of CA
>> Penal Code 593(d), Violation of US Code section 553 and 605. The plaintiff
>> is Warner Cable. Is this debt dischargeable in ch 7?
>>
>> Thank you
>> Sofya
>>
>>
>
Christine A. Wilton, Esq.
Law Office of Christine A. Wilton
*Office:*
5150 Candlewood Street, Suite 17F
Lakewood, CA 90712
*Mailing:*
4067 Hardwick Street, Suite 335
Lakewood, CA 90712
Office: 877-631-2220
Cell: 562-824-7563
Fax: 1-636-212-7078
Email: attorneychristine@gmail.com
Web: www.attorneychristine.com
Blog: www.losangelesbankruptcylawmonitor.com
***************************
Confidentiality and Privilege. This e-mail message, including attachments,
is intended solely for review by the intended recipient(s) and may contain
confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use,
disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. Review by anyone other than the
intended recipient(s) shall not constitute a waiver of any ATTORNEY-CLIENT
PRIVILEGE or ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT PROTECTION that may apply to this
communication. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the
sender by return e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.
Tax Advice Disclosure. Any tax information or written tax advice contained
in this email message, including attachments, is not intended to and cannot
be used by any taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding tax penalties that may
be imposed on the taxpayer. (The foregoing legend has been affixed pursuant
to U.S. Treasury Regulations governing tax practice.)
I will third and say it must be listed anyway. You have to take the shot.On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 3:42 PM, Leventhal Law Group, P.C. <law@3yl.com> wrote:
I second that
Jonathan Leventhal, Esq.
Leventhal Law Group, P.C.
818-347-5800
"_blank">kirkinhermosa@gmail.com>
To: "cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com" <cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: 02/26/2012 3:35 PM
Subject: RE: [cdcbaa] Dischargeability of Judgment for Cable TV Piracy
Its worth a shot though. Creditor might not know better.
On Feb 26, 2012 2:54 PM, "Leventhal Law Group, P.C." <law@3yl.com> wrote:
Likely no, if it results in criminal restitution.
Jonathan Leventhal, Esq.
Leventhal Law Group, P.C.
818-347-5800
_dav2005@yahoo.com>
To: "cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com" <cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: 02/26/2012 2:25 PM
Subject: [cdcbaa] Dischargeability of Judgment for Cable TV Piracy
Hello everyone:
PC has a civil judgment against him for Cable TV Piracy (violation of CA Penal Code 593(d), Violation of US Code section 553 and 605. The plaintiff is Warner Cable. Is this debt dischargeable in ch 7?
Thank you
Sofya
-- Christine A. Wilton, Esq.Law Office of Christine A. WiltonOffice:5150 Candlewood Street, Suite 17FLakewood, CA 90712Mailing:
4067 Hardwick Street, Suite 335Lakewood, CA 90712Office: 877-631-2220Cell: 562-824-7563Fax: 1-636-212-7078Email:
The post was migrated from Yahoo.
I second that
Jonathan Leventhal, Esq.
Leventhal Law Group, P.C.
818-347-5800
To: "cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com"
Sent: 02/26/2012 3:35 PM
Subject: RE: [cdcbaa] Dischargeability of Judgment for Cable TV Piracy
Its worth a shot though. Creditor might not know better.
On Feb 26, 2012 2:54 PM, "Leventhal Law Group, P.C." wrote:
Likely no, if it results in criminal restitution.
Jonathan Leventhal, Esq.
Leventhal Law Group, P.C.
818-347-5800
To: "cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com"
Sent: 02/26/2012 2:25 PM
Subject: [cdcbaa] Dischargeability of Judgment for Cable TV Piracy
Hello everyone:
PC has a civil judgment against him for Cable TV Piracy (violation of CA Penal Code 593(d), Violation of US Code section 553 and 605. The plaintiff is Warner Cable. Is this debt dischargeable in ch 7?
Thank you
Sofya
I second that
Jonathan Leventhal, Esq.
Leventhal Law Group, P.C.
818-347-5800
To: "cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com" <cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: 02/26/2012 3:35 PM
Subject: RE: [cdcbaa] Dischargeability of Judgment for Cable TV Piracy
Its worth a shot though. Creditor might not know better.
On Feb 26, 2012 2:54 PM, "Leventhal Law Group, P.C." <law@3yl.com> wrote:
Likely no, if it results in criminal restitution.
Jonathan Leventhal, Esq.
Leventhal Law Group, P.C.
818-347-5800
_dav2005@yahoo.com>
To: "cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com" <cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: 02/26/2012 2:25 PM
Subject: [cdcbaa] Dischargeability of Judgment for Cable TV Piracy
Hello everyone:
PC has a civil judgment against him for Cable TV Piracy (violation of CA Penal Code 593(d), Violation of US Code section 553 and 605. The plaintiff is Warner Cable. Is this debt dischargeable in ch 7?
Thank you
Sofya
The post was migrated from Yahoo.
Its worth a shot though. Creditor might not know better.
On Feb 26, 2012 2:54 PM, "Leventhal Law Group, P.C." wrote:
> **
>
>
> **
>
> Likely no, if it results in criminal restitution.
>
> Jonathan Leventhal, Esq.
> Leventhal Law Group, P.C.818-347-5800
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> To: "cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com"
> Sent: 02/26/2012 2:25 PM
> Subject: [cdcbaa] Dischargeability of Judgment for Cable TV Piracy
>
>
>
>
>
> Hello everyone:
>
> PC has a civil judgment against him for Cable TV Piracy (violation of CA
> Penal Code 593(d), Violation of US Code section 553 and 605. The plaintiff
> is Warner Cable. Is this debt dischargeable in ch 7?
>
> Thank you
> Sofya
>
>
>
Its worth a shot though. Creditor might not know better.
On Feb 26, 2012 2:54 PM, "Leventhal Law Group, P.C." <law@3yl.com> wrote:
Likely no, if it results in criminal restitution.
Jonathan Leventhal, Esq.
Leventhal Law Group, P.C.
818-347-5800
_dav2005@yahoo.com>
To: "cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com" <cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: 02/26/2012 2:25 PM
Subject: [cdcbaa] Dischargeability of Judgment for Cable TV Piracy
Hello everyone:
PC has a civil judgment against him for Cable TV Piracy (violation of CA Penal Code 593(d), Violation of US Code section 553 and 605. The plaintiff is Warner Cable. Is this debt dischargeable in ch 7?
Thank you
Sofya
The post was migrated from Yahoo.
Likely no, if it results in criminal restitution.
Jonathan Leventhal, Esq.
Leventhal Law Group, P.C.
818-347-5800
To: "cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com"
Sent: 02/26/2012 2:25 PM
Subject: [cdcbaa] Dischargeability of Judgment for Cable TV Piracy
Hello everyone:
PC has a civil judgment against him for Cable TV Piracy (violation of CA Penal Code 593(d), Violation of US Code section 553 and 605. The plaintiff is Warner Cable. Is this debt dischargeable in ch 7?
Thank you
Sofya
Likely no, if it results in criminal restitution.
Jonathan Leventhal, Esq.
Leventhal Law Group, P.C.
818-347-5800
To: "cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com" <cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: 02/26/2012 2:25 PM
Subject: [cdcbaa] Dischargeability of Judgment for Cable TV Piracy
Hello everyone:
PC has a civil judgment against him for Cable TV Piracy (violation of CA Penal Code 593(d), Violation of US Code section 553 and 605. The plaintiff is Warner Cable. Is this debt dischargeable in ch 7?
Thank you
Sofya
The post was migrated from Yahoo.
Hello everyone:
PC has a civil judgment against him for Cable TV Piracy (violation of CA Penal Code 593(d), Violation of US Code section 553 and 605. The plaintiff is Warner Cable. Is this debt dischargeable in ch 7?
Thank you
Sofya
The post was migrated from Yahoo.