.jpg)
Sheriffs Dept contact info re wage garnishments
Nick,
Please keep us posted on how it goes.
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 11:24 AM, Nicholas Gebelt wrote:
> **
>
>
> Dear Link and Kirk,****
>
> ** **
>
> Best of luck in stopping the garnishment. Up until September 2011 I could
> stop a wage garnishment immediately. However, of late I have been facing
> ongoing garnishments in spite of my contacting the creditor, the Sheriff,
> and the debtors payroll department. And its not only in LA. I just
> received a call from a Chapter 7 debtor for whom I filed on April 15 - and
> sent faxes to the creditor, the payroll department, and a letter to the OC
> Sheriffs Levying Officer (I didnt have a fax number) - who told me his
> Friday check was garnished in the amount of $900.****
>
> ** **
>
> I have a Chapter 13 debtor, five of whose postpetition checks were
> garnished. I filed an OSC motion against the LA Sheriff - the action
> against Amex settled - and at the hearing Judge Brand said she would let me
> and the LA Sheriffs attorney know her ruling on the OSC motion later.
> That was over two months ago. As the old saying goes, the Judges silence
> has been deafening. Interestingly, the Sheriffs response to my motion
> stated that the Sheriff had initiated the garnishment within two days of
> receiving the order, but was unable to stop the garnishment until five
> postpetition checks had been garnished, and couldnt return the garnished
> funds for over four months.****
>
> ** **
>
> In each case the creditor sent the Sheriff a termination order, and
> refused to take any further action, saying that it had done all it could do.
> ****
>
> ** **
>
> Im getting the distinct impression that the automatic stay no longer has
> any teeth when a Sheriff is involved, in spite of the waiver of sovereign
> immunity in 106(a).****
>
> ** **
>
> Nick****
>
> ** **
>
> Nicholas Gebelt, Ph.D., J.D.****
>
> Certified Bankruptcy Specialist****
>
> ** **
>
> [image: Description: cid:image003.jpg@01CC076B.B14D73C0]****
>
> ** **
>
> Law Offices of Nicholas Gebelt****
>
> 15150 Hornell Street****
>
> Whittier, CA 90604****
>
> Phone: 562.777.9159****
>
> FAX: 562.946.1365****
>
> Email: ngebelt@goodbye2debt.com; ngebelt@gebeltlaw.com****
>
> Web: www.goodbye2debt.com****
>
> Blog: www.southerncaliforniabankruptcylawblog.com/****
>
> ** **
>
> *We are a debt relief agency. We help people file for bankruptcy relief
> under the Bankruptcy Code.*
>
> ** **
>
> *Confidentiality Note*: This e-mail is intended only for the person or
> entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is
> privileged, confidential, or otherwise protected from disclosure.
> Dissemination, distribution, or copying of this e-mail or the information
> herein by anyone other than the intended recipient, or an employee or agent
> responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, is
> prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us
> immediately at 562.777.9159 or e-mail info@gebeltlaw.com and destroy the
> original message and all copies.****
>
> ** **
>
> *Representation Note*: If you have not signed a contract of
> representation, the Law Offices of Nicholas Gebelt do not represent you,
> and this email does not contain any legal advice for you.****
>
> ** **
>
> *IRS Circular 230 Disclosure: *In order to comply with the requirements
> imposed by the Internal Revenue Service, we inform you that any U.S. tax
> advice contained in this communication (including any attachments) is not
> intended to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding
> penalties under the Internal Revenue code, or (ii) promoting, marketing, or
> recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein.*
> ***
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com [mailto:cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com] *On Behalf
> Of *Link W. Schrader
> *Sent:* Monday, April 23, 2012 11:00 AM
> *To:* cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com
> *Subject:* RE: [cdcbaa] Sheriffs Dept contact info re wage garnishments***
> *
>
> ** **
>
> ****
>
> Kirk,****
>
> ****
>
> Here is what I have. In any case, I would follow up to make sure they
> receive the fax.****
>
> ****
>
> (213) 974-6613 Civil Case Information Line****
>
> ****
>
> (213) 974-6376 Better Number****
>
> ****
>
> Fax (Proof of Filing) Los Angeles 213-626-0934****
>
> ****
>
> Fax (Proof of Filing) Santa Monica Station: 310-392-6246****
>
> ****
>
> Fax (Proof of Filing) Pasadena Station: 626-440-1036****
>
> (626) 356-5267 Pasadena Bench Warrants****
>
> ****
>
> *Link Schrader, Attorney*****
>
> Law Office of Link W. Schrader****
>
> ****
>
> *From:* cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com [mailto:cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com] *On Behalf
> Of *Kirk Brennan
> *Sent:* Monday, April 23, 2012 10:53 AM
> *To:* Cdcbaa Yahoo Listserv
> *Subject:* [cdcbaa] Sheriffs Dept contact info re wage garnishments****
>
> ****
>
> ****
>
> Anyone have contact information for the LA county Sheriff's Dept to stop
> wage garnishments?
>
> --
> Kirk Brennan, esq.
> California Law Office, P.C.
> www.calibankruptcysite.com
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments are for the
> exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are not
> the intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or take action in
> reliance on this message. If you have received this message in error,
> please notify us immediately by return e-mail and promptly delete this
> message and its attachments from your computer system. We do not waive
> attorney-client or work product privilege by the transmission of this
> message.
> TAX ADVICE NOTICE: Tax advice, if any, contained in this e-mail does not
> constitute a "reliance opinion" as defined in IRS Circular 230 and may not
> be used to establish reasonable reliance on the opinion of counsel for the
> purpose of avoiding the penalty imposed by Section 6662A of the Internal
> Revenue Code. The firm provides reliance opinions only in formal opinion
> letters containing the signature of a director. ****
>
> ****
>
>
>
Kirk Brennan, esq.
California Law Office, P.C.
www.calibankruptcysite.com
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments are for the
exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are not
the intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or take action in
reliance on this message. If you have received this message in error,
please notify us immediately by return e-mail and promptly delete this
message and its attachments from your computer system. We do not waive
attorney-client or work product privilege by the transmission of this
message.
TAX ADVICE NOTICE: Tax advice, if any, contained in this e-mail does not
constitute a "reliance opinion" as defined in IRS Circular 230 and may not
be used to establish reasonable reliance on the opinion of counsel for the
purpose of avoiding the penalty imposed by Section 6662A of the Internal
Revenue Code. The firm provides reliance opinions only in formal opinion
letters containing the signature of a director.
Nick,Please keep us posted on how it goes.cholas Gebelt <ngebelt@gebeltlaw.com> wrote:
Dear Link and Kirk,
Best of luck in stopping the garnishment. Up until September
2011 I could stop a wage garnishment immediately. However, of late I have been
facing ongoing garnishments in spite of my contacting the creditor, the
Sheriff, and the debtors payroll department. And its not only in
LA. I just received a call from a Chapter 7 debtor for whom I filed on April
15 - and sent faxes to the creditor, the payroll department, and a letter to the
OC Sheriffs Levying Officer (I didnt have a fax number) - who
told me his Friday check was garnished in the amount of $900.
I have a Chapter 13 debtor, five of whose postpetition checks
were garnished. I filed an OSC motion against the LA Sheriff - the action
against Amex settled - and at the hearing Judge Brand said she would let me and
the LA Sheriffs attorney know her ruling on the OSC motion later. That
was over two months ago. As the old saying goes, the Judges silence has
been deafening. Interestingly, the Sheriffs response to my motion stated
that the Sheriff had initiated the garnishment within two days of receiving the
order, but was unable to stop the garnishment until five postpetition checks had
been garnished, and couldnt return the garnished funds for over four
months.
In each case the creditor sent the Sheriff a termination order,
and refused to take any further action, saying that it had done all it could do.
Im getting the distinct impression that the automatic
stay no longer has any teeth when a Sheriff is involved, in spite of the waiver
of sovereign immunity in 106(a).
Nick
Nicholas Gebelt, Ph.D., J.D.
562.946.1365
Email: ngebelt@goodbye2debt.com; ngebelt@gebeltlaw.com
Web:http://www.goodbye2debt.com/" target"_blank">www.goodbye2debt.com
Blog:http://www.southerncaliforniabankruptcylawblog.com/" target"_blank">www.southerncaliforniabankruptcylawblog.com/
We are a debt relief agency. We help people file for
bankruptcy relief under the Bankruptcy Code.
Confidentiality Note:only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain
information that is privileged, confidential, or otherwise protected from
disclosure. Dissemination, distribution, or copying of this e-mail or the
information herein by anyone other than the intended recipient, or an employee
or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, is
prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us
immediately at
The post was migrated from Yahoo.
a while back, I actually named the Sheriff individually in a motion for
violation of the stay. It got their attention and things worked fine for a while
thereafter
Kenneth Jay Schwartz, Esq.
LAW OFFICE OF KENNETH JAY SCHWARTZ
21031 Ventura Boulevard, Suite 640
Woodland Hills, California 91364-2226
Telephone: (818) 226-1205
Facsimile : (818) 226-1213
THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS E-MAIL IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE PERSONAL AND
CONFIDENTIAL USE OF THE DESIGNATED RECIPIENT(S) NAMED ABOVE. THIS MESSAGE MAY
BE AN ATTORNEY-CLIENT COMMUNICATION, AND, AS SUCH, IS PRIVILEGED AND
CONFIDENTIAL. IF THE READER OF THIS MESSAGE IS NOT THE INTENDED RECIPIENT OR AN
AGENT RESPONSIBLE FOR DELIVERING IT TO THE DESIGNATED RECIPIENT, YOU ARE HEREBY
NOTIFIED THAT YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS E-MAIL IN ERROR, AND THAT ANY REVIEW,DISSEMINATION, DISTRIBUTION OR COPYING OF THIS MESSAGE IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED.
IF YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS COMMUNICATION IN ERROR, PLEASE NOTIFY US IMMEDIATELY.
THANK YOU.
________________________________
To: "cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com"
Cc: Nicholas Gebelt
Sent: Mon, April 23, 2012 11:26:12 AM
Subject: RE: [cdcbaa] Sheriffs Dept contact info re wage garnishments
Dear Link and Kirk,
Best of luck in stopping the garnishment. Up until September 2011 I could stop
a wage garnishment immediately. However, of late I have been facing ongoing
garnishments in spite of my contacting the creditor, the Sheriff, and the
debtors payroll department. And its not only in LA. I just received a call
from a Chapter 7 debtor for whom I filed on April 15 - and sent faxes to the
creditor, the payroll department, and a letter to the OC Sheriffs Levying
Officer (I didnt have a fax number) - who told me his Friday check was
garnished in the amount of $900.
I have a Chapter 13 debtor, five of whose postpetition checks were garnished. I
filed an OSC motion against the LA Sheriff - the action against Amex settled -
and at the hearing Judge Brand said she would let me and the LA Sheriffattorney know her ruling on the OSC motion later. That was over two monthsago. As the old saying goes, the Judges silence has been deafening.
Interestingly, the Sheriffs response to my motion stated that the Sheriff had
initiated the garnishment within two days of receiving the order, but was unable
to stop the garnishment until five postpetition checks had been garnished, and
couldnt return the garnished funds for over four months.
In each case the creditor sent the Sheriff a termination order, and refused to
take any further action, saying that it had done all it could do.
Im getting the distinct impression that the automatic stay no longer has any
teeth when a Sheriff is involved, in spite of the waiver of sovereign immunity
in 106(a).
Nick
Nicholas Gebelt, Ph.D., J.D.
Certified Bankruptcy Specialist
Law Offices of Nicholas Gebelt
15150 Hornell Street
Whittier, CA 90604
Phone: 562.777.9159
FAX: 562.946.1365
Email: ngebelt@goodbye2debt.com; ngebelt@gebeltlaw.com
Web: www.goodbye2debt.com
Blog: www.southerncaliforniabankruptcylawblog.com/
We are a debt relief agency. We help people file for bankruptcy relief under
the Bankruptcy Code.
Confidentiality Note: This e-mail is intended only for the person or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged,
confidential, or otherwise protected from disclosure. Dissemination,
distribution, or copying of this e-mail or the information herein by anyoneother than the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible fordelivering the message to the intended recipient, is prohibited. If you have
received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately at 562.777.9159 or
e-mail info@gebeltlaw.comand destroy the original message and all copies.
Representation Note: If you have not signed a contract of representation, the
Law Offices of Nicholas Gebelt do not represent you, and this email does not
contain any legal advice for you.
IRS Circular 230 Disclosure: In order to comply with the requirements imposed
by the Internal Revenue Service, we inform you that any U.S. tax advice
contained in this communication (including any attachments) is not intended to
be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the
Internal Revenue code, or (ii) promoting, marketing, or recommending to another
party any transaction or matter addressed herein.
From:cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com [mailto:cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Link W.
Schrader
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2012 11:00 AM
To: cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [cdcbaa] Sheriffs Dept contact info re wage garnishments
Kirk,
Here is what I have. In any case, I would follow up to make sure they receive
the fax.
(213) 974-6613 Civil Case Information Line
(213) 974-6376 Better Number
Fax (Proof of Filing) Los Angeles 213-626-0934
Fax (Proof of Filing) Santa Monica Station: 310-392-6246
Fax (Proof of Filing) Pasadena Station: 626-440-1036
(626) 356-5267 Pasadena Bench Warrants
Link Schrader, Attorney
Law Office of Link W. Schrader
From:cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com [mailto:cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Kirk
Brennan
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2012 10:53 AM
To: Cdcbaa Yahoo Listserv
Subject: [cdcbaa] Sheriffs Dept contact info re wage garnishments
Anyone have contact information for the LA county Sheriff's Dept to stop wage
garnishments?
Kirk Brennan, esq.
California Law Office, P.C.
www.calibankruptcysite.com
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments are for the exclusive
and confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intendedrecipient, please do not read, distribute or take action in reliance on this
message. If you have received this message in error, please notify us
immediately by return e-mail and promptly delete this message and its
attachments from your computer system. We do not waive attorney-client or work
product privilege by the transmission of this message.
TAX ADVICE NOTICE: Tax advice, if any, contained in this e-mail does not
constitute a "reliance opinion" as defined in IRS Circular 230 and may not be
used to establish reasonable reliance on the opinion of counsel for the purpose
of avoiding the penalty imposed by Section 6662A of the Internal Revenue Code.
The firm provides reliance opinions only in formal opinion letters containing
the signature of a director.
a while back, I actually named the Sheriff individually in a motion for violation of the stay. It got their attention and things worked fine for a while thereafter Kenneth Jay Schwartz, Esq.LAW OFFICE OF KENNETH JAY SCHWARTZ21031 Ventura Boulevard, Suite 640Woodland Hills, California 91364-2226Telephone: (818) 226-1205Facsimile : (818) 226-1213THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS E-MAIL IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE PERSONAL AND CONFIDENTIAL USE OF THE DESIGNATED RECIPIENT(S) NAMED ABOVE. THIS MESSAGE MAY BE AN ATTORNEY-CLIENT COMMUNICATION, AND, AS SUCH, IS PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL. IF THE READER OF THIS MESSAGE IS NOT THE INTENDED RECIPIENT OR AN AGENT RESPONSIBLE FOR DELIVERING IT TO THE DESIGNATED RECIPIENT, YOU ARE HEREBY
NOTIFIED THAT YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS E-MAIL IN ERROR, AND THAT ANY REVIEW, DISSEMINATION, DISTRIBUTION OR COPYING OF THIS MESSAGE IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. IF YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS COMMUNICATION IN ERROR, PLEASE NOTIFY US IMMEDIATELY. THANK YOU.From: Nicholas Gebelt <ngebelt@gebeltlaw.com>To: "cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com" <cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com>Cc: Nicholas Gebelt <ngebelt@gebeltlaw.com>Sent: Mon, April 23, 2012 11:26:12 AMSubject: RE: [cdcbaa] Sheriffs Dept contact info re wage garnishments
Dear Link and Kirk,
Best of luck in stopping the garnishment. Up until September
2011 I could stop a wage garnishment immediately. However, of late I have been
facing ongoing garnishments in spite of my contacting the creditor, the
Sheriff, and the debtors payroll department. And its not only in
LA. I just received a call from a Chapter 7 debtor for whom I filed on April
15 - and sent faxes to the creditor, the payroll department, and a letter to the
OC Sheriffs Levying Officer (I didnt have a fax number) - who
told me his Friday check was garnished in the amount of $900.
I have a Chapter 13 debtor, five of whose postpetition checks
were garnished. I filed an OSC motion against the LA Sheriff - the action
against Amex settled - and at the hearing Judge Brand said she would let me and
the LA Sheriffs attorney know her ruling on the OSC motion later. That
was over two months ago. As the old saying goes, the Judges silence has
been deafening. Interestingly, the Sheriffs response to my motion stated
that the Sheriff had initiated the garnishment within two days of receiving the
order, but was unable to stop the garnishment until five postpetition checks had
been garnished, and couldnt return the garnished funds for over four
months.
In each case the creditor sent the Sheriff a termination order,
and refused to take any further action, saying that it had done all it could do.
Istay no longer has any teeth when a Sheriff is involved, in spite of the waiver
of sovereign immunity in 106(a).
Nick
Nicholas Gebelt, Ph.D., J.D.
Certified Bankruptcy Specialist
Law Offices of Nicholas Gebelt
15150 Hornell Street
Whittier, CA 90604
Phone: 562.777.9159
FAX: 562.946.1365
Email:
The post was migrated from Yahoo.
Dear Link and Kirk,
Best of luck in stopping the garnishment. Up until September 2011 I could stop a wage garnishment immediately. However, of late I have been facing ongoing garnishments in spite of my contacting the creditor, the Sheriff, and the debtor's payroll department. And it's not only in LA. I just received a call from a Chapter 7 debtor for whom I filed on April 15 - and sent faxes to the creditor, the payroll department, and a letter to the OC Sheriff's Levying Officer (I didn't have a fax number) - who told me his Friday check was garnished in the amount of $900.
I have a Chapter 13 debtor, five of whose postpetition checks were garnished. I filed an OSC motion against the LA Sheriff - the action against Amex settled - and at the hearing Judge Brand said she would let me and the LA Sheriff's attorney know her ruling on the OSC motion later. That was over two months ago. As the old saying goes, the Judge's silence has been deafening. Interestingly, the Sheriff's response to my motion stated that the Sheriff had initiated the garnishment within two days of receiving the order, but was unable to stop the garnishment until five postpetition checks had been garnished, and couldn't return the garnished funds for over four months.
In each case the creditor sent the Sheriff a termination order, and refused to take any further action, saying that it had done all it could do.
I'm getting the distinct impression that the automatic stay no longer has any teeth when a Sheriff is involved, in spite of the waiver of sovereign immunity in 106(a).
Nick
Nicholas Gebelt, Ph.D., J.D.
Certified Bankruptcy Specialist
[cid:image001.jpg@01CD2140.D7C64050]
Law Offices of Nicholas Gebelt
15150 Hornell Street
Whittier, CA 90604
Phone: 562.777.9159
FAX: 562.946.1365
Email: ngebelt@goodbye2debt.com; ngebelt@gebeltlaw.com
Web: www.goodbye2debt.com
Blog: www.southerncaliforniabankruptcylawblog.com/
We are a debt relief agency. We help people file for bankruptcy relief under the Bankruptcy Code.
Confidentiality Note: This e-mail is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential, or otherwise protected from disclosure. Dissemination, distribution, or copying of this e-mail or the information herein by anyone other than the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately at 562.777.9159 or e-mail info@gebeltlaw.com and destroy the original message and all copies.
Representation Note: If you have not signed a contract of representation, the Law Offices of Nicholas Gebelt do not represent you, and this email does not contain any legal advice for you.
IRS Circular 230 Disclosure: In order to comply with the requirements imposed by the Internal Revenue Service, we inform you that any U.S. tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments) is not intended to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue code, or (ii) promoting, marketing, or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein.
The post was migrated from Yahoo.
Kirk,
I do not have a number for Torrance, but if you call one of the other numbers I expect they will give it to you. I appreciate the thanks and I am happy to share, but as has been reminded to me several times (and for the benefit of others who might be following this exchange), it is recommended that thanks be given privately so that 280 other people do not have to open the email. My email for thanks is lschrader@schrader-law.com
Best Regards To All,
Link Schrader, Attorney
Law Office of Link W. Schrader
The post was migrated from Yahoo.
For those who are interested, the Torrance contact information is:
Fax (proof of filing): 310-320-8262
Tel: 310-222-3345
Best,
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Link W. Schrader wrote:
> **
>
>
> Kirk,****
>
> ** **
>
> I do not have a number for Torrance, but if you call one of the other
> numbers I expect they will give it to you. I appreciate the thanks and I
> am happy to share, but as has been reminded to me several times (and for
> the benefit of others who might be following this exchange), it is
> recommended that thanks be given privately so that 280 other people do not
> have to open the email. My email for thanks is lschrader@schrader-law.com
> ****
>
> ** **
>
> Best Regards To All,****
>
> ** **
>
> *Link Schrader, Attorney*
>
> Law Office of Link W. Schrader****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com [mailto:cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com] *On Behalf
> Of *Kirk Brennan
> *Sent:* Monday, April 23, 2012 11:08 AM
> *To:* cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com
> *Subject:* Re: [cdcbaa] Sheriffs Dept contact info re wage garnishments***
> *
>
> ** **
>
> ****
>
> Thanks Link! Do you have one for Torrance?****
>
> On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 10:59 AM, Link W. Schrader lschrader@schrader-law.com> wrote:****
>
> ****
>
> Kirk,****
>
> ****
>
> Here is what I have. In any case, I would follow up to make sure they
> receive the fax.****
>
> ****
>
> (213) 974-6613 Civil Case Information Line****
>
> ****
>
> (213) 974-6376 Better Number****
>
> ****
>
> Fax (Proof of Filing) Los Angeles 213-626-0934****
>
> ****
>
> Fax (Proof of Filing) Santa Monica Station: 310-392-6246****
>
> ****
>
> Fax (Proof of Filing) Pasadena Station: 626-440-1036****
>
> (626) 356-5267 Pasadena Bench Warrants****
>
> ****
>
> *Link Schrader, Attorney*****
>
> Law Office of Link W. Schrader****
>
> ****
>
> *From:* cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com [mailto:cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com] *On Behalf
> Of *Kirk Brennan
> *Sent:* Monday, April 23, 2012 10:53 AM
> *To:* Cdcbaa Yahoo Listserv
> *Subject:* [cdcbaa] Sheriffs Dept contact info re wage garnishments****
>
> ****
>
> ****
>
> Anyone have contact information for the LA county Sheriff's Dept to stop
> wage garnishments?
>
> --
> Kirk Brennan, esq.
> California Law Office, P.C.
> www.calibankruptcysite.com
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments are for the
> exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are not
> the intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or take action in
> reliance on this message. If you have received this message in error,
> please notify us immediately by return e-mail and promptly delete this
> message and its attachments from your computer system. We do not waive
> attorney-client or work product privilege by the transmission of this
> message.
> TAX ADVICE NOTICE: Tax advice, if any, contained in this e-mail does not
> constitute a "reliance opinion" as defined in IRS Circular 230 and may not
> be used to establish reasonable reliance on the opinion of counsel for the
> purpose of avoiding the penalty imposed by Section 6662A of the Internal
> Revenue Code. The firm provides reliance opinions only in formal opinion
> letters containing the signature of a director. ****
>
>
>
>
> --
> Kirk Brennan, esq.
> California Law Office, P.C.
> www.calibankruptcysite.com
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments are for the
> exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are not
> the intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or take action in
> reliance on this message. If you have received this message in error,
> please notify us immediately by return e-mail and promptly delete this
> message and its attachments from your computer system. We do not waive
> attorney-client or work product privilege by the transmission of this
> message.
> TAX ADVICE NOTICE: Tax advice, if any, contained in this e-mail does not
> constitute a "reliance opinion" as defined in IRS Circular 230 and may not
> be used to establish reasonable reliance on the opinion of counsel for the
> purpose of avoiding the penalty imposed by Section 6662A of the Internal
> Revenue Code. The firm provides reliance opinions only in formal opinion
> letters containing the signature of a director. ****
>
> ****
>
>
>
Kirk Brennan, esq.
California Law Office, P.C.
www.calibankruptcysite.com
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments are for the
exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are not
the intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or take action in
reliance on this message. If you have received this message in error,
please notify us immediately by return e-mail and promptly delete this
message and its attachments from your computer system. We do not waive
attorney-client or work product privilege by the transmission of this
message.
TAX ADVICE NOTICE: Tax advice, if any, contained in this e-mail does not
constitute a "reliance opinion" as defined in IRS Circular 230 and may not
be used to establish reasonable reliance on the opinion of counsel for the
purpose of avoiding the penalty imposed by Section 6662A of the Internal
Revenue Code. The firm provides reliance opinions only in formal opinion
letters containing the signature of a director.
For those who are interested, the Torrance contact information is:Fax (proof of filing): 310-320-8262Tel: 310-222-3345Best,On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Link W. Schrader <Kirk,Here is what I have. In any case, I would follow up to make sure they receive the fax.
(213) 974-6613 Civil Case Information Line
(213) 974-6376 Better Number
Fax (Proof of Filing) Los Angeles 213-626-0934
Fax (Proof of Filing) Santa Monica Station: 310-392-6246
Fax (Proof of Filing) Pasadena Station: 626-440-1036
(626) 356-5267 Pasadena Bench Warrants
Link Schrader, AttorneyLaw Office of Link W. Schrader
cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com [mailto:cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Kirk Brennan
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2012 10:53 AMTo: Cdcbaa Yahoo ListservSubject: [cdcbaa] Sheriffs Dept contact info re wage garnishments
>Anyone have contact information for the LA county Sheriff's Dept to stop wage garnishments?-- Kirk Brennan, esq.
California Law Office, P.C.www.calibankruptcysite.comCONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments are for the exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or take action in reliance on this message. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail and promptly delete this message and its attachments from your computer system. We do not waive attorney-client or work product privilege by the transmission of this message.
TAX ADVICE NOTICE: Tax advice, if any, contained in this e-mail does not constitute a "reliance opinion" as defined in IRS Circular 230 and may not be used to establish reasonable reliance on the opinion of counsel for the purpose of avoiding the penalty imposed by Section 6662A of the Internal Revenue Code. The firm provides reliance opinions only in formal opinion letters containing the signature of a director.
The post was migrated from Yahoo.
Thanks Link! Do you have one for Torrance?
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 10:59 AM, Link W. Schrader wrote:
> **
>
>
> Kirk,****
>
> ** **
>
> Here is what I have. In any case, I would follow up to make sure they
> receive the fax.****
>
> ** **
>
> (213) 974-6613 Civil Case Information Line****
>
> ** **
>
> (213) 974-6376 Better Number****
>
> ** **
>
> Fax (Proof of Filing) Los Angeles 213-626-0934****
>
> ** **
>
> Fax (Proof of Filing) Santa Monica Station: 310-392-6246****
>
> ** **
>
> Fax (Proof of Filing) Pasadena Station: 626-440-1036****
>
> (626) 356-5267 Pasadena Bench Warrants****
>
> ** **
>
> *Link Schrader, Attorney*
>
> Law Office of Link W. Schrader****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com [mailto:cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com] *On Behalf
> Of *Kirk Brennan
> *Sent:* Monday, April 23, 2012 10:53 AM
> *To:* Cdcbaa Yahoo Listserv
> *Subject:* [cdcbaa] Sheriffs Dept contact info re wage garnishments****
>
> ** **
>
> ****
>
> Anyone have contact information for the LA county Sheriff's Dept to stop
> wage garnishments?
>
> --
> Kirk Brennan, esq.
> California Law Office, P.C.
> www.calibankruptcysite.com
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments are for the
> exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are not
> the intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or take action in
> reliance on this message. If you have received this message in error,
> please notify us immediately by return e-mail and promptly delete this
> message and its attachments from your computer system. We do not waive
> attorney-client or work product privilege by the transmission of this
> message.
> TAX ADVICE NOTICE: Tax advice, if any, contained in this e-mail does not
> constitute a "reliance opinion" as defined in IRS Circular 230 and may not
> be used to establish reasonable reliance on the opinion of counsel for the
> purpose of avoiding the penalty imposed by Section 6662A of the Internal
> Revenue Code. The firm provides reliance opinions only in formal opinion
> letters containing the signature of a director. ****
>
> ****
>
>
>
Kirk Brennan, esq.
California Law Office, P.C.
www.calibankruptcysite.com
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments are for the
exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are not
the intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or take action in
reliance on this message. If you have received this message in error,
please notify us immediately by return e-mail and promptly delete this
message and its attachments from your computer system. We do not waive
attorney-client or work product privilege by the transmission of this
message.
TAX ADVICE NOTICE: Tax advice, if any, contained in this e-mail does not
constitute a "reliance opinion" as defined in IRS Circular 230 and may not
be used to establish reasonable reliance on the opinion of counsel for the
purpose of avoiding the penalty imposed by Section 6662A of the Internal
Revenue Code. The firm provides reliance opinions only in formal opinion
letters containing the signature of a director.
Thanks Link! Do you have one for Torrance?On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 10:59 AM, Link W. Schrader <lschrader@schrader-law.com> wrote:
Kirk,Here is what I have. In any case, I would follow up to make sure they receive the fax.
(213) 974-6613 Civil Case Information Line
(213) 974-6376 Better Number
Fax (Proof of Filing) Los Angeles 213-626-0934
Fax (Proof of Filing) Santa Monica Station: 310-392-6246
Fax (Proof of Filing) Pasadena Station:
The post was migrated from Yahoo.
Kirk,
Here is what I have. In any case, I would follow up to make sure they receive the fax.
(213) 974-6613 Civil Case Information Line
(213) 974-6376 Better Number
Fax (Proof of Filing) Los Angeles 213-626-0934
Fax (Proof of Filing) Santa Monica Station: 310-392-6246
Fax (Proof of Filing) Pasadena Station: 626-440-1036
(626) 356-5267 Pasadena Bench Warrants
Link Schrader, Attorney
Law Office of Link W. Schrader
The post was migrated from Yahoo.
Anyone have contact information for the LA county Sheriff's Dept to stop
wage garnishments?
Kirk Brennan, esq.
California Law Office, P.C.
www.calibankruptcysite.com
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments are for the
exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are not
the intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or take action in
reliance on this message. If you have received this message in error,
please notify us immediately by return e-mail and promptly delete this
message and its attachments from your computer system. We do not waive
attorney-client or work product privilege by the transmission of this
message.
TAX ADVICE NOTICE: Tax advice, if any, contained in this e-mail does not
constitute a "reliance opinion" as defined in IRS Circular 230 and may not
be used to establish reasonable reliance on the opinion of counsel for the
purpose of avoiding the penalty imposed by Section 6662A of the Internal
Revenue Code. The firm provides reliance opinions only in formal opinion
letters containing the signature of a director.
Anyone have contact information for the LA county Sheriff's Dept to stop wage garnishments?-- Kirk Brennan, esq.California Law Office, P.C.www.calibankruptcysite.com
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments are for the exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or take action in reliance on this message. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail and promptly delete this message and its attachments from your computer system. We do not waive attorney-client or work product privilege by the transmission of this message.
TAX ADVICE NOTICE: Tax advice, if any, contained in this e-mail does not constitute a "reliance opinion" as defined in IRS Circular 230 and may not be used to establish reasonable reliance on the opinion of counsel for the purpose of avoiding the penalty imposed by Section 6662A of the Internal Revenue Code. The firm provides reliance opinions only in formal opinion letters containing the signature of a director.
The post was migrated from Yahoo.