.jpg)
Time sensitive matter: Do I need to give adequate protection payments
Today is day 14 in an emergency case, and I need to file my plan - IDAHO
jurisdiction. Santander has the loan on a non-910 car that was repo'd and
we just got back. Do I need to give them adequate protection in the plan or
risk a relief from stay motion? This plan *should* get confirmed on
October. It's not a complicated case, but of course, anything can happen. I
don't foresee it taking long to get confirmed.
I don't know if they'll fight me on the car value, but that's another issue.
Your thoughts/experiences are appreciated.
Holly Roark
Certified Bankruptcy Specialist*
*and Sports Lawyer*
holly@roarklawoffices.com **primary email address**
www.roarklawoffices.com
*Central District of California & District of Idaho* - Consumer Bankruptcy
Attorney
1875 Century Park East, Suite 600 Los Angeles, CA 90067
T (310) 553-2600; F (310) 553-2601
*By State Bar of California Board of Legal Specialization
Today is day 14 in an emergency case, and I need to file my plan - IDAHO jurisdiction. Santander has the loan on a non-910 car that was repo'd and we just got back. Do I need to give them adequate protection in the plan or risk a relief from stay motion? This plan *should* get confirmed on October. It's not a complicated case, but of course, anything can happen. I don't foresee it taking long to get confirm
The post was migrated from Yahoo.