Does Spouse's Ch 7 property interest trump other

Post Reply
Yahoo Bot
Posts: 22904
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2020 11:38 pm


What is the cite for that case?
Sincerely,
Michael Avanesian
Law Offices of David A. Tilem
www.tilemlaw.com
818-507-6000
On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 8:44 AM, Catherine Christiansen wrote:
> **
>
>
> Actually, a quick check on title showed it is held in Joint Tenancy and
> thanks for Patrick Greens expertise in knowing the case of In re Summer that
> trumps 541 sucking the property into the H's Ch 7.
>
>
> Law Office of Catherine Christiansen
> 17011 Beach Blvd. Ste 900, Huntington Beach, CA 92647
> Tel: (714) 375-6651 Fax: (562) 490-8572
> attorneychristiansen@gmail.com
>
>
> * ***
> **
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* cdcbaa
> *To:* "cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com"
> *Sent:* Sunday, July 7, 2013 7:05 AM
> *Subject:* Re: [cdcbaa] Does Spouse's Ch 7 property interest trump other
> Spouse's Ch 11 property interest?
>
>
> Was this question not answered?
>
> Majority rule is all assets are in first case.
>
> D
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> On Jun 21, 2013, at 1:30 PM, Catherine Christiansen christiansenlaw@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
> H had Ch 7 discharged.
> W had Ch 11 dismissed.
> Postpetition, prepetition 2nd DOT holder holds improper foreclosure sale.
> H & W file State Court Action. 1.5 years into the State Court Action
> Defendants complain asset (State Court COA) not listed on BK's. State
> Court requests BK cases opened to list asset so State Court has comfort
> Stay is not violated.
> H reopens his case first to list State Court COA, defendant in State Court
> offers to purchase the COA from the Ch 7 Trustee, hearing is set for July.
> W then asks court (different BK Judge) to reopen her case to list State
> Court COA and court is waiting to reopen case until the outcome of the
> Chapter 7 purchase of the COA by the Defendants. Defendants argue 541
> super-succeeds W's Ch 11 interest in residence as H's interest and W's
> interest are tied up in the Ch 7 pursuant to 541.
> Anyone had this issue before?
>
>
>
> Law Office of Catherine Christiansen
> 17011 Beach Blvd. Ste 900, Huntington Beach, CA 92647
> Tel: (714) 375-6651 Fax: (562) 490-8572
> attorneychristiansen@gmail.com
> This e-mail is private and confidential and is intended solely for the
> recipient(s) named or otherwise identified herein. If you are not named or
> otherwise identified as an intended recipient, please delete this e-mail
> message and any copies thereof and immediately notify Christiansen Law
> Offices by e-mail or by telephone (562)608-8368.
> Representation Note: If you have not signed a contract of
> representation, Christiansen Law Offices does not represent you, and this
> email does not contain any legal advice for you. NOTICE: We are a
> federally designated Debt Relief Agency under the United States Bankruptcy
> Laws. We assist people with finding solutions to their debt
> problems,including filing petitions for relief under the Bankruptcy Code.*
> *
> And may you have the power to understand, as all God's people should, how
> wide, how long, how high, and how deep his love is. Ephesians 3:18 NLT
>
> * ***
> **
>
>
>
>
>
What is the cite for that case?Sincerely, Michael AvanesianLaw Offices of David A. Tilem
www.tilemlaw.com818-507-6000
On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 8:44 AM, Catherine Christiansen <christiansenlaw@yahoo.com> wrote:
Actually, a quick check on title showed it is held in Joint Tenancy and thanks for Patrick Greens expertise in knowing the case of In re Summer that trumps 541 sucking the property into the H's Ch 7.
Law Office of Catherine Christiansen17011 Beach Blvd. Ste 900, Huntington Beach, CA 92647
Tel: (714) 375-6651 Fax: (562) 490-8572 attorneychristiansen@gmail.com

The post was migrated from Yahoo.
Post Reply