.jpg)
pulling a credit report on an opposing party debtor
I'd say no.
On Sep 19, 2012 10:26 PM, "Kirk Brennan" wrote:
> **
>
>
> So would litigation qualify as a "whenever theres a legitimate business
> need."
>
> On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 4:05 PM, Jay Fleischman wrote:
>
>> **
>>
>>
>> Here's something I wrote a bit of time ago on permissible purpose under
>> the FCRA:
>>
>>
>> http://www.consumerhelpcentral.com/fair ... e-purpose/
>>
>> -------------
>> Jay S. Fleischman, Esq.
>> Shaev & Fleischman, LLP
>> Smart Solutions To Bill Problems
>>
>> T: 626-808-4343 x704
>> E: jay@sflawca.com
>>
>> www.ConsumerHelpCentral.com
>>
>> 556 S Fair Oaks Ave Ste 101-152
>> Pasadena CA 91105-2656
>>
>> Email isn't secure, so it's not confidential. By communicating with me
>> by email, you understand that it's not confidential.
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Kirk Brennan, esq.
> California Law Office, P.C.
> www.calibankruptcysite.com
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments are for the
> exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are not
> the intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or take action in
> reliance on this message. If you have received this message in error,
> please notify us immediately by return e-mail and promptly delete this
> message and its attachments from your computer system. We do not waive
> attorney-client or work product privilege by the transmission of this
> message.
> TAX ADVICE NOTICE: Tax advice, if any, contained in this e-mail does not
> constitute a "reliance opinion" as defined in IRS Circular 230 and may not
> be used to establish reasonable reliance on the opinion of counsel for the
> purpose of avoiding the penalty imposed by Section 6662A of the Internal
> Revenue Code. The firm provides reliance opinions only in formal opinion
> letters containing the signature of a director.
>
>
>
I'd say no.
On Sep 19, 2012 10:26 PM, "Kirk Brennan" <kirkinhermosa@gmail.com> wrote:
So would litigation qualify as a "whenever theres a legitimate business need."On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 4:05 PM, Jay Fleischman <bankruptcy@gmail.com> wrote:
Here's something I wrote a bit of time ago on permissible purpose under the FCRA:
The post was migrated from Yahoo.
So would litigation qualify as a "whenever theres a legitimate business
need."
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 4:05 PM, Jay Fleischman wrote:
> **
>
>
> Here's something I wrote a bit of time ago on permissible purpose under
> the FCRA:
>
>
> http://www.consumerhelpcentral.com/fair ... e-purpose/
>
> -------------
> Jay S. Fleischman, Esq.
> Shaev & Fleischman, LLP
> Smart Solutions To Bill Problems
>
> T: 626-808-4343 x704
> E: jay@sflawca.com
>
> www.ConsumerHelpCentral.com
>
> 556 S Fair Oaks Ave Ste 101-152
> Pasadena CA 91105-2656
>
> Email isn't secure, so it's not confidential. By communicating with me by
> email, you understand that it's not confidential.
>
>
>
Kirk Brennan, esq.
California Law Office, P.C.
www.calibankruptcysite.com
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments are for the
exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are not
the intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or take action in
reliance on this message. If you have received this message in error,
please notify us immediately by return e-mail and promptly delete this
message and its attachments from your computer system. We do not waive
attorney-client or work product privilege by the transmission of this
message.
TAX ADVICE NOTICE: Tax advice, if any, contained in this e-mail does not
constitute a "reliance opinion" as defined in IRS Circular 230 and may not
be used to establish reasonable reliance on the opinion of counsel for the
purpose of avoiding the penalty imposed by Section 6662A of the Internal
Revenue Code. The firm provides reliance opinions only in formal opinion
letters containing the signature of a director.
So would litigation qualify as a "whenever theres a legitimate business need."On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 4:05 PM, Jay Fleischman <bankruptcy@gmail.com> wrote:
Here's something I wrote a bit of time ago on permissible purpose under the FCRA:
The post was migrated from Yahoo.
You can't pull anyone's credit report without their express
authorization.
*************************
Mark J. Markus
Law Office of Mark J. Markus
11684 Ventura Blvd. PMB #403
Studio City, CA 91604-2652
(818)509-1173 (818)509-1460 (fax)
web: http://www.bklaw.com/
Certified Bankruptcy Law Specialist--The State Bar of California
Board of Legal Specialization
This Firm is a Qualified Federal Debt Relief Agency (see what this
means at
The post was migrated from Yahoo.