.jpg)
Reaff hearings - do both debtors have to be present if
Well that's a little different. In my case they're both on the loan.
Holly Roark
holly@roarklawoffices.com
www.roarklawoffices.com
Central District of California
Consumer Bankruptcy Attorney
1875 Century Park East, Suite 600
Los Angeles, CA 90067
T (310) 553-2600
F (310) 553-2601
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 9:00 PM, Office wrote:
> **
>
>
> My client just had one in OC where only he was on the Ioan in a joint
> case. Only he went to the reaffirmation hearing. Approved.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
> Law Office of Eric Alan Mitnick
> (310) 792-5864 MitnickLaw@aol.com
> Communications and attachments may be confidential and attorney-client
> privileged.
>
> On Sep 24, 2012, at 8:55 PM, Holly Roark wrote:
>
>
>
> I would think that both debtors need to be present at the reaff hearing if
> they're both on the contract, but I have a client whose joint debtor wife
> cannot get off work to go to the hearing (or so she says). Can the Debtor
> (only) show up? He is going to ask for the agreement to be disapproved as
> not being in their best interest. It's my understanding that having it
> disapproved on those grounds is much different from having it disapproved
> for failure to appear. We want the benefit of the ride through, so we want
> the judge to disapprove it as not being in their best interest but I am not
> sure whether we can get that ruling if the joint debtor fails to appear.
> Do you know?
>
> The case is with BR in LA.
>
>
> Holly Roark
> holly@roarklawoffices.com
> www.roarklawoffices.com
> Central District of California
> Consumer Bankruptcy Attorney
> 1875 Century Park East, Suite 600
> Los Angeles, CA 90067
> T (310) 553-2600
> F (310) 553-2601
>
>
>
>
The post was migrated from Yahoo.