.jpg)
ch 13 question
Would it make sense to file a RARA after the debtor has filed all their
schedules? Many of the RARA provisions don't apply because they relate to
before the case is filed. Anyone see an objection to the RARA in this
scenario?
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 5:51 PM, 'Leventhal Law Group, P.C.' law@3yl.com
[cdcbaa] wrote:
>
>
> Yes, just submit a fee app.
>
>
> Jonathan Leventhal, Esq.
>
> 818-347-5800
>
>
> This email and any attachments thereto may contain private,
> confidential, and privileged material for the sole use of the intended
> recipient. Any review, copying, or distribution of this email (or any
> attachments thereto) by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the
> intended recipient, please contact the sender immediately and permanently
> delete the original and any copies of this email and any attachments
> thereto.
>
> Leventhal Law Group, P.C. is a Debt Relief Agency under federal law.
>
>
> -------- Original message --------
> Date:02/03/2015 5:07 PM (GMT-08:00)
> To: Cdcbaa Yahoo Listserv
> Subject: [cdcbaa] ch 13 question
>
>
>
> PC filed chapter 13 pro se and now wants legal representation. Can
> lawyer take a retainer from PC if placed into IOLTA trust account? Or is
> this disallowed?
> Thanks,
>
> --
> Kirk Brennan
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments are for the
> exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are not
> the intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or take action in
> reliance on this message. If you have received this message in error,
> please notify us immediately by return e-mail and promptly delete this
> message and its attachments from your computer system. We do not waive
> attorney-client or work product privilege by the transmission of this
> message.
> TAX ADVICE NOTICE: Tax advice, if any, contained in this e-mail does not
> constitute a "reliance opinion" as defined in IRS Circular 230 and may not
> be used to establish reasonable reliance on the opinion of counsel for the
> purpose of avoiding the penalty imposed by Section 6662A of the Internal
> Revenue Code. The firm provides reliance opinions only in formal opinion
> letters containing the signature of a director.
>
>
>
Kirk Brennan
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments are for the
exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are not
the intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or take action in
reliance on this message. If you have received this message in error,
please notify us immediately by return e-mail and promptly delete this
message and its attachments from your computer system. We do not waive
attorney-client or work product privilege by the transmission of this
message.
TAX ADVICE NOTICE: Tax advice, if any, contained in this e-mail does not
constitute a "reliance opinion" as defined in IRS Circular 230 and may not
be used to establish reasonable reliance on the opinion of counsel for the
purpose of avoiding the penalty imposed by Section 6662A of the Internal
Revenue Code. The firm provides reliance opinions only in formal opinion
letters containing the signature of a director.
Would it make sense to file a RARA after the debtor has filed all their schedules? Many of the RARA provisions don't apply because they relate to before the case is filed. Anyone see an objection to the RARA in this scenario?On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 5:51 PM, 'Leventhal Law Group, P.C.' law@3yl.com [cdcbaa] <cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
Yes, just submit a fee app.
The post was migrated from Yahoo.
PC filed chapter 13 pro se and now wants legal representation. Can lawyer
take a retainer from PC if placed into IOLTA trust account? Or is this
disallowed?
Thanks,
Kirk Brennan
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments are for the
exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are not
the intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or take action in
reliance on this message. If you have received this message in error,
please notify us immediately by return e-mail and promptly delete this
message and its attachments from your computer system. We do not waive
attorney-client or work product privilege by the transmission of this
message.
TAX ADVICE NOTICE: Tax advice, if any, contained in this e-mail does not
constitute a "reliance opinion" as defined in IRS Circular 230 and may not
be used to establish reasonable reliance on the opinion of counsel for the
purpose of avoiding the penalty imposed by Section 6662A of the Internal
Revenue Code. The firm provides reliance opinions only in formal opinion
letters containing the signature of a director.
PC filed chapter 13 pro se and now wants legal representation. Can lawyer take a retainer from PC if placed into IOLTA trust account? Or is this disallowed?Thanks,-- Kirk BrennanCONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments are for the exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or take action in reliance on this message. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail and promptly delete this message and its attachments from your computer system. We do not waive attorney-client or work product privilege by the transmission of this message. TAX ADVICE NOTICE: Tax advice, if any, contained in this e-mail does not constitute a "reliance opinion" as defined in IRS Circular 230 and may not be used to establish reasonable reliance on the opinion of counsel for the purpose of avoiding the penalty imposed by Section 6662A of the Internal Revenue Code. The firm provides reliance opinions only in formal opinion letters containing the signature of a director.
The post was migrated from Yahoo.