.jpg)
supp fee app in ch 13
So you serve all creditors on a subsequent fee app even if the subsequent
fee app amount is under $1K?
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 1:36 PM, wrote:
> **
>
>
> **
> I have always understood that to mean, the first $1,000.00 above the RARA
> fee for basic services, not $1.000 for each fee application.
>
> Mark T. Jessee
> Law Offices of Mark T. Jessee
> "A Debt Relief Agency"
> 50 W. Hillcrest Drive, Suite 200
> Thousand Oaks, CA 91360
> (805) 497-5868 (805) 497-5864 (Facsimile)
>
>
>
> In a message dated 11/8/2012 1:32:48 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
> kirkinhermosa@gmail.com writes:
>
>
>
> LBR 3015-1(x)(5) states that:
>
> "An application by debtors counsel for additional fees and costs not
> exceeding
> $1,000 over and above the limits set forth in the RARA and Guidelines need
> be
> served only on the chapter 13 trustee and the debtor."
>
> Does this mean that any supplemental fee app under $1K only needs to be
> served on the chapter 13 trustee and the debtor?
>
> What if there is a first fee app for less than $1K, and a second fee app
> later on for less than $1K. Combined they are over $1K over the limits in
> the RARA (assuming maximum RARA charge). Does this scenario require
> service on all creditors in the 2nd supplemental fee app?
>
> Thanks,
>
> --
> Kirk Brennan, esq.
> California Law Office, P.C.
> www.calibankruptcysite.com
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments are for the
> exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are not
> the intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or take action in
> reliance on this message. If you have received this message in error,
> please notify us immediately by return e-mail and promptly delete this
> message and its attachments from your computer system. We do not waive
> attorney-client or work product privilege by the transmission of this
> message.
> TAX ADVICE NOTICE: Tax advice, if any, contained in this e-mail does not
> constitute a "reliance opinion" as defined in IRS Circular 230 and may not
> be used to establish reasonable reliance on the opinion of counsel for the
> purpose of avoiding the penalty imposed by Section 6662A of the Internal
> Revenue Code. The firm provides reliance opinions only in formal opinion
> letters containing the signature of a director.
>
>
>
Kirk Brennan, esq.
California Law Office, P.C.
www.calibankruptcysite.com
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments are for the
exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are not
the intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or take action in
reliance on this message. If you have received this message in error,
please notify us immediately by return e-mail and promptly delete this
message and its attachments from your computer system. We do not waive
attorney-client or work product privilege by the transmission of this
message.
TAX ADVICE NOTICE: Tax advice, if any, contained in this e-mail does not
constitute a "reliance opinion" as defined in IRS Circular 230 and may not
be used to establish reasonable reliance on the opinion of counsel for the
purpose of avoiding the penalty imposed by Section 6662A of the Internal
Revenue Code. The firm provides reliance opinions only in formal opinion
letters containing the signature of a director.
So you serve all creditors on a subsequent fee app even if the subsequent fee app amount is under $1K?On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 1:36 PM, <jesseelaw@aol.com> wrote:
I have always understood that to mean, the first $1,000.00 above the RARA
fee for basic services, not $1.000 for each fee application.
Mark T.
JesseeLaw Offices of Mark T. Jessee"A Debt Relief Agency"50 W.
Hillcrest Drive, Suite 200Thousand Oaks, CA 91360(805) 497-5868 (805)
497-5864 (Facsimile)
In a message dated 11/8/2012 1:32:48 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
kirkinhermosa@gmail.com writes:
LBR 3015-1(x)(5) states that:"An application by debtors counsel
for additional fees and costs not exceeding$1,000 over and above the limits set forth in the RARA and Guidelines need beserved only on the chapter 13 trustee and the debtor."Does this mean that any
supplemental fee app under $1K only needs to be served on the chapter 13 trustee and the debtor?What if there is a first fee app for less than
$1K, and a second fee app later on for less than $1K. Combined they are
over $1K over the limits in the RARA (assuming maximum RARA charge).
Does this scenario require service on all creditors in the 2nd supplemental
fee app?Thanks,-- Kirk Brennan,
esq.California Law Office, P.C.www.calibankruptcysite.comCONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:
This e-mail and any attachments are for the exclusive and confidential use of
the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not
read, distribute or take action in reliance on this message. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail
and promptly delete this message and its attachments from your computer
system. We do not waive attorney-client or work product privilege by the transmission of this message. TAX ADVICE NOTICE: Tax advice, if any, contained in this e-mail does not constitute a "reliance opinion" as defined
in IRS Circular 230 and may not be used to establish reasonable reliance on
the opinion of counsel for the purpose of avoiding the penalty imposed by Section 6662A of the Internal Revenue Code. The firm provides reliance
opinions only in formal opinion letters containing the signature of a
director.
-- Kirk Brennan, esq.California Law Office, P.C.www.calibankruptcysite.comCONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments are for the exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or take action in reliance on this message. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail and promptly delete this message and its attachments from your computer system. We do not waive attorney-client or work product privilege by the transmission of this message.
TAX ADVICE NOTICE: Tax advice, if any, contained in this e-mail does not constitute a "reliance opinion" as defined in IRS Circular 230 and may not be used to establish reasonable reliance on the opinion of counsel for the purpose of avoiding the penalty imposed by Section 6662A of the Internal Revenue Code. The firm provides reliance opinions only in formal opinion letters containing the signature of a director.
The post was migrated from Yahoo.
I have always understood that to mean, the first $1,000.00 above the RARA fee for basic services, not $1.000 for each fee application.
Mark T. Jessee
Law Offices of Mark T. Jessee
"A Debt Relief Agency"
50 W. Hillcrest Drive, Suite 200
Thousand Oaks, CA 91360
(805) 497-5868 (805) 497-5864 (Facsimile)
In a message dated 11/8/2012 1:32:48 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
kirkinhermosa@gmail.com writes:
LBR 3015-1(x)(5) states that:
"An application by debtors counsel for additional fees and costs not
exceeding
$1,000 over and above the limits set forth in the RARA and Guidelines needbe
served only on the chapter 13 trustee and the debtor."
Does this mean that any supplemental fee app under $1K only needs to be
served on the chapter 13 trustee and the debtor?
What if there is a first fee app for less than $1K, and a second fee app
later on for less than $1K. Combined they are over $1K over the limits inthe RARA (assuming maximum RARA charge). Does this scenario require service
on all creditors in the 2nd supplemental fee app?
Thanks,
Kirk Brennan, esq.
California Law Office, P.C.
_www.calibankruptcysite.com_ (http://www.calibankruptcysite.com/)
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments are for the
exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are not the
intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or take action in reliance
on this message. If you have received this message in error, please notifyus immediately by return e-mail and promptly delete this message and its
attachments from your computer system. We do not waive attorney-client or work
product privilege by the transmission of this message.
TAX ADVICE NOTICE: Tax advice, if any, contained in this e-mail does not
constitute a "reliance opinion" as defined in IRS Circular 230 and may notbe used to establish reasonable reliance on the opinion of counsel for thepurpose of avoiding the penalty imposed by Section 6662A of the Internal
Revenue Code. The firm provides reliance opinions only in formal opinion
letters containing the signature of a director.
I have always understood that to mean, the first $1,000.00 above the RARA
fee for basic services, not $1.000 for each fee application.
Mark T.
JesseeLaw Offices of Mark T. Jessee"A Debt Relief Agency"50 W.Hillcrest Drive, Suite 200Thousand Oaks, CA 91360(805) 497-5868 (805)
497-5864 (Facsimile)
In a message dated 11/8/2012 1:32:48 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
kirkinhermosa@gmail.com writes:
LBR 3015-1(x)(5) states that:"An application by debtor for additional fees and costs not exceeding$1,000 over and above the limits set forth in the RARA and Guidelines need beserved only on the chapter 13 trustee and the debtor."Does this mean that any
supplemental fee app under $1K only needs to be served on the chapter 13 trustee and the debtor?What if there is a first fee app for less than
$1K, and a second fee app later on for less than $1K. Combined they are
over $1K over the limits in the RARA (assuming maximum RARA charge).
Does this scenario require service on all creditors in the 2nd supplemental
fee app?Thanks,-- Kirk Brennan,
esq.California Law Office, P.C.www.calibankruptcysite.comCONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:
This e-mail and any attachments are for the exclusive and confidential use of
the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not
read, distribute or take action in reliance on this message. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail
and promptly delete this message and its attachments from your computer
system. We do not waive attorney-client or work product privilege by the transmission of this message. TAX ADVICE NOTICE: Tax advice, if any, contained in this e-mail does not constitute a "reliance opinion" as defined
in IRS Circular 230 and may not be used to establish reasonable reliance on
the opinion of counsel for the purpose of avoiding the penalty imposed by Section 6662A of the Internal Revenue Code. The firm provides reliance
opinions only in formal opinion letters containing the signature of a
director.
The post was migrated from Yahoo.
LBR 3015-1(x)(5) states that:
"An application by debtors counsel for additional fees and costs not
exceeding
$1,000 over and above the limits set forth in the RARA and Guidelines need
be
served only on the chapter 13 trustee and the debtor."
Does this mean that any supplemental fee app under $1K only needs to be
served on the chapter 13 trustee and the debtor?
What if there is a first fee app for less than $1K, and a second fee app
later on for less than $1K. Combined they are over $1K over the limits in
the RARA (assuming maximum RARA charge). Does this scenario require
service on all creditors in the 2nd supplemental fee app?
Thanks,
Kirk Brennan, esq.
California Law Office, P.C.
www.calibankruptcysite.com
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments are for the
exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are not
the intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or take action in
reliance on this message. If you have received this message in error,
please notify us immediately by return e-mail and promptly delete this
message and its attachments from your computer system. We do not waive
attorney-client or work product privilege by the transmission of this
message.
TAX ADVICE NOTICE: Tax advice, if any, contained in this e-mail does not
constitute a "reliance opinion" as defined in IRS Circular 230 and may not
be used to establish reasonable reliance on the opinion of counsel for the
purpose of avoiding the penalty imposed by Section 6662A of the Internal
Revenue Code. The firm provides reliance opinions only in formal opinion
letters containing the signature of a director.
LBR 3015-1(x)(5) states that:"An application by debtors counsel for additional fees and costs not exceeding$1,000 over and above the limits set forth in the RARA and Guidelines need beserved only on the chapter 13 trustee and the debtor."
Does this mean that any supplemental fee app under $1K only needs to be served on the chapter 13 trustee and the debtor?What if there is a first fee app for less than $1K, and a second fee app later on for less than $1K. Combined they are over $1K over the limits in the RARA (assuming maximum RARA charge). Does this scenario require service on all creditors in the 2nd supplemental fee app?
Thanks,-- Kirk Brennan, esq.California Law Office, P.C.www.calibankruptcysite.comCONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments are for the exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or take action in reliance on this message. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail and promptly delete this message and its attachments from your computer system. We do not waive attorney-client or work product privilege by the transmission of this message.
TAX ADVICE NOTICE: Tax advice, if any, contained in this e-mail does not constitute a "reliance opinion" as defined in IRS Circular 230 and may not be used to establish reasonable reliance on the opinion of counsel for the purpose of avoiding the penalty imposed by Section 6662A of the Internal Revenue Code. The firm provides reliance opinions only in formal opinion letters containing the signature of a director.
The post was migrated from Yahoo.