.jpg)
how to use published article you want to quote verbatim
I have found an article that makes all the arguments I want to make in an
appellate case, which arguments I made either in writing or orally in the
underlying case, though not as artfully. It is beautifully supported by
case law, statutes and legislative history for an issue for which all you
can find is dicta or poorly reasoned decisions. I must confess that I want
to basically say, something like: this "[professor] makes all of the
arguments that require a ruling in favor of the Debtors in his article
entitled [name] and I reproduce verbatim the relevant sections here to
avoid diluting the strength of his compelling arguments directly on point
and urge this panel to read all of these important arguments:"
I think simply briefly summarizing the points and directing the Court to
read the attached article will lead to the Court's not actually reading the
article and relying on the brief summaries (though it is difficult to
summarize here without losing important points). What do you all think?
Is that acceptable?
WE DO NOT ACCEPT SERVICE BY EMAIL UNLESS WE HAVE AGREED TO ACCEPT IT IN
WRITING.
Giovanni Orantes, Esq.*
Orantes Law Firm, P.C.
3435 Wilshire Blvd. Suite 2920
Los Angeles, CA 90010
Tel: (213) 389-4362
Fax: (877) 789-5776
e-mail: go@gobklaw.com
website: www.gobklaw.com
**Certified Bankruptcy Specialist, State Bar of California, Board of Legal
Specialization*
*Board Certified - Business Bankruptcy Law - American Board of Certification
*Board Certified - Consumer Bankruptcy Law - American Board of Certification
Commercial Litigation
Estate Planning
Outside General Counsel
WE ARE A "DEBT RELIEF AGENCY" AS DEFINED BY FEDERAL LAW.
SERVING BAKERSFIELD, LOS ANGELES, ORANGE COUNTY, RIVERSIDE, SAN BERNARDINO
AND SANTA BARBARA AND THE WORLD FOR CHAPTER 11 AND 15 CASES.
I have found an article that makes all the arguments I want to make in an appellate case, which arguments I made either in writing or orally in the underlying case, though not as artfully. It is beautifully supported by case law, statutes and legislative history for an issue for which all you can find is dicta or poorly reasoned decisions. I must confess that I want to basically say, something like: this "[professor] makes all of the arguments that require a ruling in favor of the Debtors in his article entitled [name] and I reproduce verbatim the relevant sections here to avoid diluting the strength of his compelling arguments directly on point and urge this panel to read all of these important arguments:"I think simply briefly summarizing the points and directing the Court to read the attached article will lead to the Court's not actually reading the article and relying on the brief summaries (though it is difficult to summarize here without losing important points). What do you all think? Is that acceptable?--
The post was migrated from Yahoo.