.jpg)
Renoticing claims bar date in Chapter 7 after no-dividend report
Dennis,
The substantive point re code allowing payment of late filed claims was previous made and responded to in this thread.
What do you think aboutthe UST not following the rules?
Law Office of Peter M. Lively * Personal Financial Law Center I
11268 Washington Boulevard, Suite 203, Culver City, California 90230-4647
Telephone: (310) 391-2400* Toll Free: (800) 307-3328 * Fax: (310) 391-2462
On Thursday, February 13, 2014 10:13 PM, cdcbaa wrote:
Nick:
Ok, the case you cite, may say the court cannot set a second bar date, so what? The code says late claims get paid before money returns to the debtor,. Trustees have been known to get on the phone and call creditors to get them to file late claims.
What can a court do? Say the late claims are not valid? no way, they are just late, and ahead of the debtor.
Also note, the spell checker approves reconsider, but marks renotice as misspelled. What horrible programing!
d
Dennis McGoldrick, 350 S. Crenshaw Bl., #A207B, Torrance, Ca 90503 310-328-1001-voice
On Feb 12, 2014, at 12:53 PM, Nicholas Gebelt wrote:
>Dear Peter,
>
>The answer to your question is no.
>
>The Court in In re Hall, 218 B.R. 275, 276-77 (Bankr. D. R.I. 1998)>
>
>
The post was migrated from Yahoo.
Nick:
Ok, the case you cite, may say the court cannot set a second bar date, so what? The code says late claims get paid before money returns to the debtor,. Trustees have been known to get on the phone and call creditors to get them to file late claims.
What can a court do? Say the late claims are not valid? no way, they are just late, and ahead of the debtor.
Also note, the spell checker approves reconsider, but marks renotice as misspelled. What horrible programing!
d
Dennis McGoldrick, 350 S. Crenshaw Bl., #A207B, Torrance, Ca 90503 310-328-1001-voice
> On Feb 12, 2014, at 12:53 PM, Nicholas Gebelt wrote:
>
> Dear Peter,
>
>
>
> The answer to your question is no.
>
>
>
> The Court in In re Hall, 218 B.R. 275, 276-77 (Bankr. D. R.I. 1998)
>
>
>
>
>
On Feb 12, 2014, at 12:53 PM, Nicholas Gebelt <ngebelt@gebeltlaw.com> wrote:
Dear Peter,
The answer to your question is no.
The Court in
In re Hall, 218 B.R. 275, 276-77 (Bankr. D. R.I. 1998)
The post was migrated from Yahoo.