Central District Consumer Bankruptcy Attorney's Association

Judge Russell did not join the conclusions of law in Manalad (60 BR 288) * insert parenthetical here please *
Sent from my iPhone - please excuse typos.
> On Jan 7, 2016, at 11:53 PM, Michael Avanesian michael@avanesianlaw.com [cdcbaa] wrote:
>
> I have a case in front of Judge Russell where my clients "completed" credit counseling before filing their case but the certificate was not issued until after the case was filed. Most likely because they did not click the final few buttons to have the certificate issued.
>
> Since there are so many other compliance issues, I am considering a stipulation to dismiss the case. If we decide to dismiss, I would prefer the judge to strike the petition in lieu of dismissal.
>
> Judge Russell did not join the conclusions of law in Manalad (60 BR 288) so my question is, does anyone know his position with respect to credit counseling?
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Michael Avanesian, Esq.
> Avanesian Law Firm
> 801 N. Brand Blvd., Suite #1130
> Glendale, CA 91203
> Tel: 818.276.2477 | Fax: 818.208.4550
>
> Confidentiality: This electronic transmission and its contents are legally privileged and confidential information and intended solely for the use of the addressee. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying or other use of this message and its contents is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please reply to us immediately and delete this message from your directory.
> IRS Circular 230 Disclosure: To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS, please be advised that any U.S. federal tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments) is not intended or written to be used or relied upon, and cannot be used or relied upon, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code, or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein.
>
>
Judge Russell did not join the conclusions of law in Manalad (60 BR 288) * insert parenthetical here please *Sent from my iPhone - please excuse typos.On Jan 7, 2016, at 11:53 PM, Michael Avanesian michael@avanesianlaw.com [cdcbaa] <cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

I have a case in front of Judge Russell where my clients "completed" credit counseling before filing their case but the certificate was not issued until after the case was filed. Most likely because they did not click the final few buttons to have the certificate issued.Since there are so many other compliance issues, I am considering a stipulation to dismiss the case. If we decide to dismiss, I would prefer the judge to strike the petition in lieu of dismissal. Judge Russell did not join the conclusions of law in Manalad (60 BR 288) so my question is, does anyone know his position with respect to credit counseling?
The post was migrated from Yahoo.

I have a case in front of Judge Russell where my clients "completed" credit
counseling before filing their case but the certificate was not issued
until after the case was filed. Most likely because they did not click the
final few buttons to have the certificate issued.
Since there are so many other compliance issues, I am considering a
stipulation to dismiss the case. If we decide to dismiss, I would prefer
the judge to strike the petition in lieu of dismissal.
Judge Russell did not join the conclusions of law in Manalad (60 BR 288) so
my question is, does anyone know his position with respect to credit
counseling?
Sincerely,
*Michael Avanesian, Esq. *
Avanesian Law Firm
801 N. Brand Blvd., Suite #1130
Glendale, CA 91203
Tel: 818.276.2477 | Fax: 818.208.4550
*Confidentiality**: *This electronic transmission and its contents are
legally privileged and confidential information and intended solely for the
use of the addressee. If the reader of this message is not the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution,
copying or other use of this message and its contents is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please reply
to us immediately and delete this message from your directory.
*IRS Circular 230 Disclosure:* To ensure compliance with requirements
imposed by the IRS, please be advised that any U.S. federal tax advice
contained in this communication (including any attachments) is not intended
or written to be used or relied upon, and cannot be used or relied upon,
for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code,
or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any
transaction or matter addressed herein.
I have a case in front of Judge Russell where my clients "completed" credit counseling before filing their case but the certificate was not issued until after the case was filed. Most likely because they did not click the final few buttons to have the certificate issued.Since there are so many other compliance issues, I am considering a stipulation to dismiss the case. If we decide to dismiss, I would prefer the judge to strike the petition in lieu of dismissal.Judge Russell did not join the conclusions of law in Manalad (60 BR 288) so my question is, does anyone know his position with respect to credit counseling?Sincerely,Michael Avanesian, Esq.801 N. Brand Blvd., Suite #1130Glendale, CA 91203Tel: 818.276.2477 | Fax:
The post was migrated from Yahoo.