.jpg)
Chapter 13 Mortgage Declarations
Judge Zurzolo stated in court at his last confirmation hearings that the
proof was not required. Nancy was appearing for the hearings. So she
heard him tell everyone that they need not attach proof. I sent an email
to Masako and she verified that they are no longer looking for the
proof.
Thank you,
Nancy B. Clark
100 N. Barranca Ave, Suite 250
West Covina, CA 91791
Tele: (626) 332-8600
Fax: (626) 332-8644
www.blclaw.com
The post was migrated from Yahoo.
Does Nancy Curry still require proof?
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 10:11 AM, nancybonaccorso wrote:
> **
>
>
> I spoke to Melissa Besecker recently about mortgage declarations and the
> local bankruptcy rules. She verified that at least in the Valley and SB all
> of the judges are going along with the new local rules regarding the
> mortgage declaration. There is no need to attach proof of payment and
> mailing unless otherwise specified. In addition, she wanted everyone to
> know that mortgage declarations must be cummulative as of the date of
> filing. She stated that many of you are still attaching the proof or are
> not filing cummulative mortgage declarations. So please make the
> adjustments in your practice.
>
> Thank you,
> Nancy B. Clark
> Borowitz & Clark, LLC
> 100 N. Barranca Avenue, Suite 250
> West Covina, CA 91791
> Office: (626) 332-8600
> Fax: (626) 332-8644
> www.blclaw.com
> Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If
> you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for
> delivery of the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this
> message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly
> notify the sender by reply email. Please advise immediately if you or your
> employer does not consent to Internet email for messages of this kind.
> Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message that do not
> relate to the official business of my firm shall be understood as neither
> given nor endorsed by it.
>
> IRS Circular 230 Disclosure: To ensure compliance with Treasury Department
> Regulations, we advise you that, unless otherwise expressly indicated, any
> federal tax advice contained in this communication was
> not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of
> (i) avoiding tax-related penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or
> applicable state or local tax law provisions or (ii) promoting, marketing
> or recommending to another party any tax-related matter addressed herein.
>
>
>
Kirk Brennan
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments are for the
exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are not
the intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or take action in
reliance on this message. If you have received this message in error,
please notify us immediately by return e-mail and promptly delete this
message and its attachments from your computer system. We do not waive
attorney-client or work product privilege by the transmission of this
message.
TAX ADVICE NOTICE: Tax advice, if any, contained in this e-mail does not
constitute a "reliance opinion" as defined in IRS Circular 230 and may not
be used to establish reasonable reliance on the opinion of counsel for the
purpose of avoiding the penalty imposed by Section 6662A of the Internal
Revenue Code. The firm provides reliance opinions only in formal opinion
letters containing the signature of a director.
Does Nancy Curry still require proof?
The post was migrated from Yahoo.
I spoke to Melissa Besecker recently about mortgage declarations and the local bankruptcy rules. She verified that at least in the Valley and SB all of the judges are going along with the new local rules regarding the mortgage declaration. There is no need to attach proof of payment and mailing unless otherwise specified. In addition, she wanted everyone to know that mortgage declarations must be cummulative as of the date of filing. She stated that many of you are still attaching the proof or are not filing cummulative mortgage declarations. So please make the adjustments in your practice.
Thank you,
Nancy B. Clark
Borowitz & Clark, LLC
100 N. Barranca Avenue, Suite 250
West Covina, CA 91791
Office: (626) 332-8600
Fax: (626) 332-8644
www.blclaw.com
Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply email. Please advise immediately if you or your employer does not consent to Internet email for messages of this kind. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message that do not relate to the official business of my firm shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it.
IRS Circular 230 Disclosure: To ensure compliance with Treasury Department Regulations, we advise you that, unless otherwise expressly indicated, any federal tax advice contained in this communication was
not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding tax-related penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or applicable state or local tax law provisions or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any tax-related matter addressed herein.
The post was migrated from Yahoo.