.jpg)
Interaction between a long fraudulent transfer SOL and a =
after pi claim runs, no longer a creditor (unless statute waived), there must be a creditor for a fraudulent conveyance. So no cause of action for fraudulent conveyance.
________________________________
To: CDCBAA Listserv ; NACBA BK ; CAMFFG
Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2012 7:08 PM
Subject: [cdcbaa] Interaction between a long fraudulent transfer SOL and a short tort SOL
Limitation period for California fraudulent transfer underCalifornia
Civil Code Section 3439.09 can be as long as 7 years. A personal injury statute of limitations is 2 years. If a personal injury perpetrator committed a fraudulent transfer, a strange situation arises.
1. In state court,would the personal injury claimant be able to pursue a fraudulent transfer claim after his personal injury claim is time-barred?
2. In bankruptcy court, would the trustee, having stepped into the shoes of the personal injury claimant, whose claimbecametime-barred prepetition, would the trustee be able to pursue a fraudulent transfer claim that is not time-barred.
For example,
Negligent driver causes an accident and injures Victim on 1/5/2008. Shortly thereafter, on 1/7/2008 Negligent Driver transfers his house (owned free and clear) to his brother. Assuming no exceptions apply, the Victim's last day to file a suit for personal injuries is 1/5/2010. Victim's lawyer blows the statute and does not file a suit in two years. Three years and two days after the accident, 3 years after the transfer, on 1/7/2011, negligent driver files bankruptcy. Only 3 years passed after the fraudulent transfer, so recovery of the fraudulent transfer is not time-barred. The victim's claim is time barred, and he is entitled to no distribution in the bankruptcy.
May the trustee stand in the shoes of the time-barred personal injury claimant to unwind the fraudulent transfer and bring the paid off house into the estate?
Alik Segal
Alik.Segal@gmail.com
310-362-6157
California Central District
The post was migrated from Yahoo.