.jpg)
=?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_=5Bcdcbaa=5D_stacking_defenses_to_come_within_the_=245?=
I don't have a case for you but you're in the right. Otherwise a Trustee
could overcome the floor by alleging more than the floor was a preference.
Sincerely,
*Michael Avanesian, Esq. *
Simon Resnik Hayes, LLP
15233 Ventura Blvd., Suite 250
Sherman Oaks, CA 91403
Tel: 818.783.6251 | Cel: 818.817.1725
*Confidentiality**: *This electronic transmission and its contents are
legally privileged and confidential information and intended solely for the
use of the addressee. If the reader of this message is not the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution,
copying or other use of this message and its contents is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please reply
to us immediately and delete this message from your directory.
*IRS Circular 230 Disclosure:* To ensure compliance with requirements
imposed by the IRS, please be advised that any U.S. federal tax advice
contained in this communication (including any attachments) is not intended
or written to be used or relied upon, and cannot be used or relied upon,
for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code,
or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any
transaction or matter addressed herein.
On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 4:16 PM, rolandk_98@yahoo.com [cdcbaa] wrote:
>
>
> List mates.
> I am defending a preferential transfer claim by the trustee in the amount
> of $7000.00 (for non consumer debt)
> I have new value defense of $4000 547(c)(4)
> that leaves a balance of $3000 I am claiming that this value is below the
> 547(c)(9) limit and therefore I do not need to pay it back.
> Trustee not buying it and asking for a case. I did a lexisnexis search and
> can not find a case either way saying I can or can not claim it as a
> defense.
> any ideas or experience you can share?
> thx
>
>
> Roland Kedikian, Esq.
> www.LosAngelesBKLaw.com
>
>
>
The post was migrated from Yahoo.