Threshold requirements for using "next friend" under FRBP 1004.1

Post Reply
Yahoo Bot
Posts: 22904
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2020 11:38 pm


I did one case with next friend last year as well if anyone is looking for
an exemplar.
Desiree Causey, Esq.
Law Office of Desiree Causey
7755 Center Avenue, Suite 1100 (NEW ADDRESS AS OF DECEMBER 2014)
Huntington Beach, CA 92647
714-372-2225 (phone)
714-908-7646 (same fax number)
Privileged And Confidential Communication.
This electronic transmission, and any documents attached hereto, (a) are
protected by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act (18 USC
2510-2521), (b) may contain confidential and/or legally privileged
information, and (c) are for the sole use of the intended recipient named
above. If you have received this electronic message in error, please notify
the sender and delete the electronic message. Any disclosure, copying,
distribution, or use of the contents of the information received in error is
strictly prohibited.
Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.

The post was migrated from Yahoo.
Yahoo Bot
Posts: 22904
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2020 11:38 pm


Mark,
I've done two next friend petitions. The next friend on one case was the
spouse. In the second case, it was the niece with whom the debtor was
living. In the second case, I knew the debtor professionally (former CPA).
I found one case from Oregon which I cited in my motions.
The best guidance would be to review my two cases and see how I did it.
The case numbers: 1:13-bk-14390-MT and 2:13-bk-29471-TD
Gerry
Gerald McNally
McNally & Associates, P.C.
517 East Wilson Ave., Ste 104
Glendale, CA 91206
818.507.5100
Fax: 818.507.5001
Notice to Recipient: This email is meant for only the intended recipient of
the transmission and may be a communication privileged by law. If you
received this email in error, and review, use, dissemination, distribution
or copying of this email is strictly prohibited. Please notify us
immediately of the error by return email and please delete this message and
any and all duplicates of this message from your system. Thank you in
advance for your cooperation.
IRS Circular 230 Disclosure: In order to comply with the requirements
imposed by the Internal Revenue Service, we inform you that any U.S. tax
advice contained in this communication (including any attachments) is not
intended to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding
penalties under the Internal Revenue code or (ii) promoting, marketing or
recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein.

The post was migrated from Yahoo.
Yahoo Bot
Posts: 22904
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2020 11:38 pm


Mark,
Thats a question those of us who also do probate and trust work often face. Probate code 810-813 covers legal capacity. Look at 812. I believe the determination is very subjective; and can vary from day to day. There are levels of mental capacity, the capacity to marry is the lowest, then testamentary, at the top is the capacity to contract. Next friend is a federal rule, not a California probate law that I am aware of. The power of attorney should work, if the person had the necessary mental capacity when they signed it. I have gotten court approval on a trust made by the agent under power of attorney.
For trust clients, I tell them to bring me a Doctors letter stating that the client/patient has been examine for cognitive ability and are considered capable to contract, or not. Of course, if capable you dont need a next friend; if not how do you enter into a retainer with someone who is not capable of contracting? I have not done a best friend bankruptcy, and I dont see how it could work if the client has cognitive issues. Now if a client had a stroke after filing and pre 341; next friend could carry on.
Pat, and others may have different views.
Best regards
Larry Webb
California Board of Legal Specialization
Certified Specialist in Bankruptcy Law
State Bar of California 229344
Central District California
"A Debt Relief Agency"
Check out my Blog
Webblaw@gmail.com
Law Offices of Larry Webb
484 Mobil Ste 43
Camarillo Ca 93010
P 805.987.1400
F 805.987.2866
C 805.750.2150
Law Office Larry Webb Bankruptcy Attorney
The following notice is required by the United States Supreme Court's interpretation of 11 U.S.C. 101(12A): The Law Offices of Larry Webb is a Bankruptcy Attorney Debt Relief Agency as defined by 11 U.S.C. 101(12A) of the Bankruptcy Code. We help people file for relief under the Bankruptcy code. Bankruptcy is a Federal Court Proceeding that supersedes State Court Civil Litigation

The post was migrated from Yahoo.
Post Reply