BPO v. Appraisal
Posted: Wed Feb 04, 2009 8:00 am
Yesterday, I had the privilege of appearing in Judge Thompson's courtroom.
A debtor's counsel asked the judge, paraphrasing, if an appraisal is
necessary evidence on a Lam motion or whether a (less expensive) BPO would
suffice. The learned judge responded that a BPO would indeed be relevant
evidence, but of course subject to appropriate weighing (experience of BPO
author in real estate, experience of author in the geographic area, etc.),
and seemed to be quite ok with BPOs, in general. Hale
Yesterday, I had the
privilege of appearing in Judge Thompson's courtroom. A debtor's counsel
asked the judge, paraphrasing, if an appraisal is necessary evidence on a
Lam motion or whether a (less expensive) BPO would suffice.
The learned judge responded that a BPO would indeed be relevant evidence,
but of course subject to appropriate weighing (experience of BPO author in
real estate, experience of author in the geographic area, etc.), and seemed to
be quite ok with BPOs, in general.
Hale
The post was migrated from Yahoo.