.jpg)
complaint to strip 2nd DOT
Does anyone use the date of the plan for the value of the home pursuant to
In re: SALAHELDIN ABDELGADIR and AFAF WAHBI, Debtors.
BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING, LP f/k/a Countrywide Home Loans Servicing, LP,
Appellant,
v.
SALAHELDIN ABDELGADIR; AFAF WAHBI, Appellees.
BAP No. NV-11-1021-HJoJu, Bk. No. 09-23398-LBR.
United
States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted on July 20, 2011 at Las Vegas, Nevada.
Filed August 16, 2011.
Law Office of Catherine Christiansen
________________________________
To: cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, November 14, 2011 4:35 PM
Subject: RE: [cdcbaa] complaint to strip 2nd DOT
Kirk:
The date the petition was filed. The appraisal must specifically cite that date.
Steven B. Lever
From:cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com [mailto:cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Kirk Brennan
Sent: Monday, November 14, 2011 1:54 PM
To: Cdcbaa Yahoo Listserv
Subject: [cdcbaa] complaint to strip 2nd DOT
When preparing a complaint to strip a second DOT in front of J. Zurzulo, what date do you use for the date of valuation of the property? What date do you use for the liens?
Is it the date the bk petition is filed? The date the appraisal is done? Both?
Thanks,
Kirk Brennan, esq.
California Law Office, P.C.
calibankrutpcysite.com
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments are for the exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or take action in reliance on this message. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail and promptly delete this message and its attachments from your computer system. We do not waive attorney-client or work product privilege by the transmission of this message.
TAX ADVICE NOTICE: Tax advice, if any, contained in this e-mail does not constitute a "reliance opinion" as defined in IRS Circular 230 and may not be used to establish reasonable reliance on the opinion of counsel for the purpose of avoiding the penalty imposed by Section 6662A of the Internal Revenue Code. The firm provides reliance opinions only in formal opinion letters containing the signature of a director.
________________________________
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 10.0.1411 / Virus Database: 2092/4016 - Release Date: 11/14/11
The post was migrated from Yahoo.
Thanks
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 4:35 PM, Steven B. Lever wrote:
> **
>
>
> Kirk:****
>
> ** **
>
> The date the petition was filed. The appraisal must specifically cite
> that date.****
>
> ** **
>
> Steven B. Lever ****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com [mailto:cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com] *On Behalf
> Of *Kirk Brennan
> *Sent:* Monday, November 14, 2011 1:54 PM
> *To:* Cdcbaa Yahoo Listserv
> *Subject:* [cdcbaa] complaint to strip 2nd DOT****
>
> ** **
>
> ****
>
> When preparing a complaint to strip a second DOT in front of J. Zurzulo,
> what date do you use for the date of valuation of the property? What date
> do you use for the liens?
>
> Is it the date the bk petition is filed? The date the appraisal is done?
> Both?
>
> Thanks,
>
> --
> Kirk Brennan, esq.
> California Law Office, P.C.
> calibankrutpcysite.com
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments are for the
> exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are not
> the intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or take action in
> reliance on this message. If you have received this message in error,
> please notify us immediately by return e-mail and promptly delete this
> message and its attachments from your computer system. We do not waive
> attorney-client or work product privilege by the transmission of this
> message.
> TAX ADVICE NOTICE: Tax advice, if any, contained in this e-mail does not
> constitute a "reliance opinion" as defined in IRS Circular 230 and may not
> be used to establish reasonable reliance on the opinion of counsel for the
> purpose of avoiding the penalty imposed by Section 6662A of the Internal
> Revenue Code. The firm provides reliance opinions only in formal opinion
> letters containing the signature of a director. ****
>
> ****
> ------------------------------
>
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 10.0.1411 / Virus Database: 2092/4016 - Release Date: 11/14/11***
> *
>
>
>
Kirk Brennan, esq.
California Law Office, P.C.
calibankrutpcysite.com
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments are for the
exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are not
the intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or take action in
reliance on this message. If you have received this message in error,
please notify us immediately by return e-mail and promptly delete this
message and its attachments from your computer system. We do not waive
attorney-client or work product privilege by the transmission of this
message.
TAX ADVICE NOTICE: Tax advice, if any, contained in this e-mail does not
constitute a "reliance opinion" as defined in IRS Circular 230 and may not
be used to establish reasonable reliance on the opinion of counsel for the
purpose of avoiding the penalty imposed by Section 6662A of the Internal
Revenue Code. The firm provides reliance opinions only in formal opinion
letters containing the signature of a director.
ThanksOn Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 4:35 PM, Steven B. Lever <sblever@leverlaw.com> wrote:
Kirk:The date the petition was filed. The appraisal must specifically cite that date.
Steven B. Lever
From: cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com [mailto:cdcbaa@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Kirk Brennan
Sent: Monday, November 14, 2011 1:54 PMTo: Cdcbaa Yahoo ListservSubject: [cdcbaa] complaint to strip 2nd DOT
hen preparing a complaint to strip a second DOT in front of J. Zurzulo, what date do you use for the date of valuation of the property? What date do you use for the liens?
Is it the date the bk petition is filed? The date the appraisal is done? Both?Thanks,-- Kirk Brennan, esq.California Law Office, P.C.calibankrutpcysite.com
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments are for the exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or take action in reliance on this message. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail and promptly delete this message and its attachments from your computer system. We do not waive attorney-client or work product privilege by the transmission of this message.
TAX ADVICE NOTICE: Tax advice, if any, contained in this e-mail does not constitute a "reliance opinion" as defined in IRS Circular 230 and may not be used to establish reasonable reliance on the opinion of counsel for the purpose of avoiding the penalty imposed by Section 6662A of the Internal Revenue Code. The firm provides reliance opinions only in formal opinion letters containing the signature of a director.
No virus found in this message.Checked by AVG - www.avg.comVersion: 10.0.1411 / Virus Database: 2092/4016 - Release Date: 11/14/11
-- Kirk Brennan, esq.California Law Office, P.C.calibankrutpcysite.comCONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments are for the exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or take action in reliance on this message. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail and promptly delete this message and its attachments from your computer system. We do not waive attorney-client or work product privilege by the transmission of this message.
TAX ADVICE NOTICE: Tax advice, if any, contained in this e-mail does not constitute a "reliance opinion" as defined in IRS Circular 230 and may not be used to establish reasonable reliance on the opinion of counsel for the purpose of avoiding the penalty imposed by Section 6662A of the Internal Revenue Code. The firm provides reliance opinions only in formal opinion letters containing the signature of a director.
The post was migrated from Yahoo.
When preparing a complaint to strip a second DOT in front of J. Zurzulo,
what date do you use for the date of valuation of the property? What date
do you use for the liens?
Is it the date the bk petition is filed? The date the appraisal is done?
Both?
Thanks,
Kirk Brennan, esq.
California Law Office, P.C.
calibankrutpcysite.com
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments are for the
exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are not
the intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or take action in
reliance on this message. If you have received this message in error,
please notify us immediately by return e-mail and promptly delete this
message and its attachments from your computer system. We do not waive
attorney-client or work product privilege by the transmission of this
message.
TAX ADVICE NOTICE: Tax advice, if any, contained in this e-mail does not
constitute a "reliance opinion" as defined in IRS Circular 230 and may not
be used to establish reasonable reliance on the opinion of counsel for the
purpose of avoiding the penalty imposed by Section 6662A of the Internal
Revenue Code. The firm provides reliance opinions only in formal opinion
letters containing the signature of a director.
When preparing a complaint to strip a second DOT in front of J. Zurzulo, what date do you use for the date of valuation of the property? What date do you use for the liens?Is it the date the bk petition is filed?Thanks,-- Kirk Brennan, esq.California Law Office, P.C.calibankrutpcysite.comCONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments are for the exclusive and confidential use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, distribute or take action in reliance on this message. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail and promptly delete this message and its attachments from your computer system. We do not waive attorney-client or work product privilege by the transmission of this message.
TAX ADVICE NOTICE: Tax advice, if any, contained in this e-mail does not constitute a "reliance opinion" as defined in IRS Circular 230 and may not be used to establish reasonable reliance on the opinion of counsel for the purpose of avoiding the penalty imposed by Section 6662A of the Internal Revenue Code. The firm provides reliance opinions only in formal opinion letters containing the signature of a director.
The post was migrated from Yahoo.