.jpg)
If no opposition to 362(d) motion-auto, is it better practice to file a response re non-opp? or just not respond at all?
I used to file non oppositions, but I no longer do so. My reasoning is that
I take a 2090 Limited Scope Retainer in all of my 7s (which I have limited
my practice to now in my semi-retirement). It is my opinion that plays heck
with the limited scope status of my case when I do (the 2090 is filed with
the case). When I was doing 13s and 11s, if I did not oppose the motion,
I did file a non opposition because there was no 2090 form for those cases.
This is a long winded way of saying I would in any case where I did not take
a limited scope 2090 retainer limitation.
Hank
_____
The post was migrated from Yahoo.